453 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
453 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
layout: "guides"
|
|
page_title: "Upgrading to Terraform 0.12"
|
|
sidebar_current: "upgrade-guides-0-12"
|
|
description: |-
|
|
Upgrading to Terraform v0.12
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Upgrading to Terraform v0.12
|
|
|
|
~> Terraform 0.12 has not yet been released. This guide includes some initial
|
|
information to help when trying out the beta releases of Terraform v0.12.0, and
|
|
will be updated with more detail until the final release. Please do not use
|
|
v0.12.0 prereleases against production infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
~> If you are trying v0.12.0-beta1, please see [the release announcement](https://www.hashicorp.com/blog/announcing-terraform-0-1-2-beta1) for some important extra information.
|
|
|
|
[Terraform v0.12 will be a major release](https://hashicorp.com/blog/terraform-0-1-2-preview)
|
|
focused on configuration language improvements and thus will include some
|
|
changes that you'll need to consider when upgrading. The goal of this guide is
|
|
to cover the most common upgrade concerns and issues.
|
|
|
|
For most users, upgrading configuration should be completely automatic. Some
|
|
simple configurations will require no changes at all, and most other
|
|
configurations can be prepared by running
|
|
[the automatic upgrade tool](/docs/commands/0.12upgrade.html). Please read on
|
|
for more information and recommendations on the upgrade process.
|
|
|
|
## Upgrade to Terraform 0.11 first
|
|
|
|
If you are currently using Terraform v0.10 or earlier, we strongly recommend
|
|
first completing an upgrade to the latest Terraform v0.11 release first. This
|
|
will give you an opportunity to address any changes required for the previous
|
|
major version upgrades separately, rather than making multiple changes at
|
|
once.
|
|
|
|
In particular, if you are upgrading from a Terraform version prior to v0.9,
|
|
you _must_ first [upgrade to Terraform v0.9](/upgrade-guides/0-9.html) and
|
|
switch to initializing with `terraform init`, because v0.12 no longer includes
|
|
the functionality for automatically migrating from the legacy remote state
|
|
mechanism.
|
|
|
|
This guide focuses on changes from v0.11 to v0.12. Each previous major release
|
|
has its own upgrade guide, so please consult the other guides (available in the
|
|
navigation) to upgrade step-by-step to v0.11 first.
|
|
|
|
## Upgrading Terraform providers
|
|
|
|
The new language features in Terraform v0.12 required some changes to the
|
|
protocol Terraform uses to interact with provider plugins. These changes give
|
|
Terraform CLI access to the resource type schemas of each provider, allowing
|
|
for more helpful validation-related error messages and more predictable behavior.
|
|
|
|
However, this means that provider releases built before v0.12 cannot be used.
|
|
We have updated the provider SDK to support both the old and new protocols at
|
|
once, to allow upgrading to newer provider versions while remaining on
|
|
Terraform v0.11.
|
|
|
|
We recommend upgrading to the latest versions of all providers you use
|
|
and ensuring that `terraform plan` is working with them before upgrading to
|
|
Terraform v0.12, since this allows you to reduce risk by changing only one
|
|
component at a time, particularly if you will be adopting a new major version
|
|
of a provider which may have breaking changes of its own.
|
|
|
|
### Third-party Providers
|
|
|
|
The Terraform team at HashiCorp is working with the maintainers of the
|
|
HashiCorp-distributed providers to produce v0.12-compatible releases, which
|
|
will appear gradually before the v0.12.0 final release.
|
|
|
|
Third-party providers that are not distributed by HashiCorp will also require
|
|
updates. We will share more information on the upgrade procedure as we get
|
|
closer to final release. In the mean time, the first step is to upgrade the
|
|
vendored `github.com/hashicorp/terraform` packages to a v0.12 release tag and
|
|
verify that the acceptance tests are still working. Because acceptance tests
|
|
contain configuration snippets, you may need to perform some of the
|
|
configuration upgrade steps described in the following sections to make the
|
|
acceptance tests compatible with the v0.12 configuration language.
|
|
|
|
## Upgrading Terraform configuration
|
|
|
|
Some users with simple configurations may find that no changes are required at
|
|
all, and most configurations that _do_ require updates can be upgraded
|
|
automatically using [the automatic upgrade tool](/docs/commands/0.12upgrade.html).
|
|
|
|
Some users have written configurations that include workarounds for limitations
|
|
in previous versions of the Terraform language, such as:
|
|
|
|
- Treating block types like attributes in an attempt to work around Terraform
|
|
not supporting generating nested blocks dynamically.
|
|
([#7034](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/7034))
|
|
|
|
- Wrapping redundant list brackets (`[` and `]`) around splat expressions in
|
|
order to force them to be interpreted as lists even when there are unknown
|
|
items in the list.
|
|
|
|
These workarounds were clever solutions offered by community members, and have
|
|
been partial inspiration for new language features. These workarounds should no
|
|
longer be necessary in Terraform v0.12, but the same results may now need to be
|
|
achieved using new language constructs.
|
|
|
|
The upgrade tool can replace many of these workarounds with the new solutions
|
|
automatically. In rarer cases, the intent of the original configuration may be
|
|
ambiguous, in which case the tool will add to your configuration a comment
|
|
containing the marker `TF-UPGRADE-TODO` to indicate a situation where your
|
|
human intuition is required to decide how to proceed.
|
|
|
|
We recommend running the upgrade tool in a clean version control work tree so
|
|
that you can use the VCS diffing tools to easily see and review all of the
|
|
proposed updates. Search the upgraded module for `TF-UPGRADE-TODO` to find
|
|
the situations where human attention is required.
|
|
|
|
Even if your existing configuration works without upgrading, we still recommend
|
|
to run the upgrade tool to update to the more readable syntax conventions
|
|
supported in this release, and to draw attention to any potential issues.
|
|
|
|
The following sections describe in more detail some of the situations that will
|
|
be detected and upgraded by the upgrade tool, both to help understand the
|
|
purpose of certain proposed changes and to help users who may not wish to
|
|
use the automatic upgrade tool. However, the following sections are not
|
|
completely comprehensive so we still recommend using the upgrade tool to review
|
|
its output, even if you then discard the proposed changes and make your updates
|
|
manually.
|
|
|
|
### Remote state references
|
|
|
|
The `terraform_remote_state` data source has changed slightly for the v0.12
|
|
release to make all of the remote state outputs available as a single map
|
|
value, rather than as top-level attributes as in previous releases.
|
|
|
|
In previous releases, a reference to a `vpc_id` output exported by the remote
|
|
state data source might have looked like this:
|
|
|
|
```hcl
|
|
data.terraform_remote_state.vpc.vpc_id
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This value must now be accessed via the new `outputs` attribute:
|
|
|
|
```hcl
|
|
data.terraform_remote_state.vpc.outputs.vpc_id
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Where appropriate, you can also access the outputs attribute directly to
|
|
work with the whole map as a single value:
|
|
|
|
```hcl
|
|
data.terraform_remote_state.vpc.outputs
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Attributes vs. blocks
|
|
|
|
Terraform resource configurations consist of both arguments that set
|
|
individual properties of the main object being described, and nested blocks
|
|
which declare zero or more other objects that are modeled as being part of
|
|
their parent. For example:
|
|
|
|
```hcl
|
|
resource "aws_instance" "example" {
|
|
instance_type = "t2.micro"
|
|
ami = "ami-abcd1234"
|
|
|
|
tags = {
|
|
Name = "example instance"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ebs_block_device {
|
|
device_name = "sda2"
|
|
volume_type = "gp2"
|
|
volume_size = 24
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
In the above resource, `instance_type`, `ami`, and `tags` are both direct
|
|
arguments of the `aws_instance` resource, while `ebs_block_device` describes
|
|
a separate EBS block device object that is, in some sense, a part of the
|
|
parent instance.
|
|
|
|
Due to the design of the configuration language decoder in Terraform v0.11 and
|
|
earlier, it was in many cases possible to interchange the argument syntax
|
|
(with `=`) and the block syntax (with just braces) when dealing with map
|
|
arguments vs. nested blocks. However, this led to some subtle bugs and
|
|
limitations, so Terraform v0.12 now requires consistent usage of argument
|
|
syntax for arguments and nested block syntax for nested blocks.
|
|
|
|
In return for this new strictness, Terraform v0.12 now allows map keys to be
|
|
set dynamically from expressions, which is a long-requested feature. The
|
|
main difference between a map attribute and a nested block is that a map
|
|
attribute will usually have user-defined keys, like we see in the `tags`
|
|
example above, while a nested block always has a fixed set of supported
|
|
arguments defined by the resource type schema, which Terraform will validate.
|
|
|
|
The configuration upgrade tool uses the provider's schema to recognize the
|
|
nature of each construct and will select the right syntax automatically. For
|
|
most simple usage, this will just involve adding or removing the equals sign
|
|
as appropriate.
|
|
|
|
A more complicated scenario is where users found that they could exploit this
|
|
flexibility to -- with some caveats -- dynamically generate nested blocks even
|
|
though this wasn't intentionally allowed:
|
|
|
|
```hcl
|
|
# Example of no-longer-supported workaround from 0.11 and earlier
|
|
ebs_block_device = "${concat(map("device_name", "sda4"), var.extra_block_devices)}"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Terraform v0.12 now includes a first-class feature for dynamically generating
|
|
nested blocks using expressions, using the special `dynamic` block type. The
|
|
above can now be written like this, separating the static block device from
|
|
the dynamic ones:
|
|
|
|
```hcl
|
|
ebs_block_device {
|
|
device_name = "sda4"
|
|
}
|
|
dynamic "ebs_block_device" {
|
|
for_each = var.extra_block_devices
|
|
content {
|
|
device_name = ebs_block_device.value.device_name
|
|
volume_type = ebs_block_device.value.volume_type
|
|
volume_size = ebs_block_device.value.volume_size
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The configuration upgrade tool will detect use of the above workaround and
|
|
rewrite it as a `dynamic` block, but it may make non-ideal decisions for how to
|
|
flatten your expression down into static vs. dynamic blocks, so we recommend
|
|
reviewing the generated `dynamic` blocks to see if any simplifications are
|
|
possible.
|
|
|
|
Terraform v0.12 now also requires that each argument be set only once within
|
|
a particular block, whereas before Terraform would either take the last
|
|
definition or, in some cases, attempt to merge together multiple definitions
|
|
into a list. The upgrade tool does not remove or attempt to consolidate
|
|
any existing duplicate arguments, but other commands like `terraform validate`
|
|
will detect and report these after upgrading.
|
|
|
|
## Terraform Configuration upgrades requiring human intervention
|
|
There are some known situations that will be detected, but not upgrade, by the
|
|
upgrade tool. Some examples of these situatations include:
|
|
|
|
* `count` can no longer be used a variable name.
|
|
* `resource` names cannot start with a number, though they can still contain numbers.
|
|
|
|
## Working with `count` on resources
|
|
|
|
The `count` feature allows declaration of multiple instances of a particular
|
|
resource constructed from the same configuration. In Terraform v0.11, any
|
|
use of `count` would generally lead to referring to the resource in question
|
|
using the "splat expression" syntax elsewhere in the configuration:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
aws_instance.example.*.id[0]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Because `aws_instance.example` itself was not directly referencable in
|
|
Terraform v0.11, the expression system allowed some flexibility in how such
|
|
expressions were resolved. For example, Terraform would treat
|
|
`aws_instance.example.id` as an alias for `aws_instance.example.*.id[0]`.
|
|
|
|
Terraform v0.12 allows referring to an entire resource as an object value,
|
|
but that required making a decision on what type of value is returned by
|
|
`aws_instance.example`. The new rules are as follows:
|
|
|
|
* For resources where `count` is _not_ set, a reference like
|
|
`aws_instance.example` returns a single object, whose attributes can be
|
|
accessed in the usual way, like `aws_instance.example.id`.
|
|
|
|
* For resources where `count` _is_ set -- even if the expression evaluates to
|
|
`1` -- `aws_instance.example` returns a list of objects whose length is
|
|
decided by the count. In this case `aws_instance.example.id` is an error,
|
|
and must instead be written as `aws_instance.example[0].id` to access
|
|
one of the objects before retrieving its `id` attribute value.
|
|
|
|
The splat syntax is still available and will still be useful in situations
|
|
where a list result is needed, but we recommend updating expressions like
|
|
`aws_instance.example.*.id[count.index]` to instead be
|
|
`aws_instance.example[count.index].id`, which should be easier to read and
|
|
understand for those who are familiar with other languages.
|
|
|
|
Another consequence of the new handling of `count` is that you can use the
|
|
`length` function directly with references to resources that have `count` set:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
length(aws_instance.example)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This replaces the v0.11 special case of `aws_instance.example.count`, which
|
|
can no longer be supported due to `aws_instance.example` being a list.
|
|
|
|
The upgrade tool will automatically detect references that are inconsistent
|
|
with the `count` setting on the target resource and rewrite them to use the
|
|
new syntax. The upgrade tool will _not_ rewrite usage of splat syntax to
|
|
direct index syntax, because the old splat syntax form is still compatible.
|
|
|
|
Another `count`-related change is that Terraform now requires `count` to be
|
|
assigned a numeric value, and will not automatically convert a boolean value
|
|
to a number in the interests of clarity. If you wish to use a boolean value
|
|
to activate or deactivate a particular resource, use the conditional operator
|
|
to show clearly how the boolean value maps to a number value:
|
|
|
|
```hcl
|
|
count = var.enabled ? 1 : 0
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## First-class expressions
|
|
|
|
Terraform v0.11 and earlier allowed expressions only within interpolation
|
|
sequences, like `"${var.example}"`. Because expressions are such an important
|
|
part of Terraform -- they are the means by which we connect the attributes of
|
|
one resource to the configuration of another -- Terraform v0.12 now allows
|
|
you to use expressions directly when defining most attributes.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
ami = var.ami
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The generalization of expression handling also has some other benefits. For
|
|
example, it's now possible to directly construct lists and maps within
|
|
expressions using the normal syntax, whereas in Terraform v0.11 we required
|
|
using the `list` and `map` functions:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
# Old 0.11 example
|
|
tags = "${merge(map("Name", "example"), var.common_tags)}"
|
|
|
|
# Updated 0.12 example
|
|
tags = merge({ Name = "example" }, var.common_tags)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The automatic upgrade tool will perform rewrites like these automatically,
|
|
making expressions easier to read and understand.
|
|
|
|
## Default settings in `connection` blocks
|
|
|
|
Terraform v0.11 and earlier allowed providers to pre-populate certain arguments
|
|
in a `connection` block for use with remote provisioners. Several resource
|
|
type implementations use this to pre-populate `type` as `"ssh"` and `host`
|
|
as one of the IP addresses of the compute instance being created.
|
|
|
|
While that feature was convenient in some cases, we found that in practice it
|
|
was hard for users to predict how it would behave, since each provider had its
|
|
own rules for whether to prefer public vs. private IP addresses, which network
|
|
interface to use, whether to use IPv4 or IPv6, etc.
|
|
|
|
It also violated our design principle of "explicit is better than implicit": we
|
|
think it's important that someone who is unfamiliar with a particular Terraform
|
|
configuration (or with Terraform itself) to be able to read the configuration
|
|
and make a good guess as to what it will achieve, and the default connection
|
|
settings feature left an important detail unstated: how do the provisioners
|
|
access the host?
|
|
|
|
With this in mind, Terraform v0.12 no longer performs any automatic population
|
|
of `connection` blocks. Instead, if you are using any remote provisioners you
|
|
should explicitly set the connection type and the hostname to connect to:
|
|
|
|
```hcl
|
|
connection {
|
|
type = "ssh"
|
|
host = self.public_ip
|
|
# ...
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The automatic upgrade tool will detect existing `connection` blocks that are
|
|
lacking these settings within resource types that are known to have previously
|
|
set defaults, and it will write out an expression that approximates whatever
|
|
selection logic the provider was previously doing in its own implementation.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately in some cases the provider did not export the result of the
|
|
possibly-rather-complex host selection expression as a single attribute, and so
|
|
for some resource types the generated `host` expression will be quite
|
|
complicated. We recommend reviewing these and replacing them with a simpler
|
|
expression where possible, since you will often know better than Terraform does
|
|
which of the instance IP addresses are likely to be accessible from the host
|
|
where Terraform is running.
|
|
|
|
## Upgrades for reusable modules
|
|
|
|
If you are making upgrades to a reusable module that is consumed by many
|
|
different configurations, you may need to take care with the timing of your
|
|
upgrade and of how you publish it.
|
|
|
|
We strongly recommend using module versioning, either via a Terraform registry
|
|
or via version control arguments in your module source addresses, to pin
|
|
existing references to the old version of the module and then publish the
|
|
upgraded version under a new version number. If you are using semantic
|
|
versioning, such as in a Terraform registry, the updates made by the upgrade
|
|
tool should be considered a breaking change and published as a new major
|
|
version.
|
|
|
|
The migration tool will automatically add a `>= 0.12.0` Terraform version
|
|
constraint to indicate that the module has been upgraded to use v0.12-only
|
|
features. By using version constraints, users can gradually update their callers
|
|
to use the newly-upgraded version as they begin to use Terraform v0.12 with
|
|
those modules.
|
|
|
|
For simpler modules it may be possible to carefully adapt them to be both
|
|
0.11 and 0.12 compatible at the same time, by following the upgrade notes in
|
|
earlier sections and avoiding any 0.12-only features. However, for any module
|
|
using a undocumented workarounds for 0.11 limitations it is unlikely to be
|
|
possible to both update it for Terraform v0.12 and retain v0.11 compatibility
|
|
at the same time, because those undocumented workarounds have been replaced
|
|
with new features in Terraform v0.12.
|
|
|
|
## Map variables no longer merge when overridden
|
|
|
|
In prior versions of Terraform, a variable of type `"map"` had a special
|
|
behavior where any value provided via mechanisms such as the `-var` command
|
|
line option would be keywise-merged with any default value associated with
|
|
the variable. This was useful in early versions of Terraform that lacked
|
|
mechanisms for doing such merging explicitly, but since Terraform v0.10
|
|
introduced the concept of local values we consider it preferable to perform
|
|
such merges manually so that they are explicit in configuration:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
variable "example_map" {
|
|
type = map(string)
|
|
default = {}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
locals {
|
|
default_map_keys = {
|
|
"a" = "b"
|
|
}
|
|
merged_map_keys = merge(local.default_map_keys, var.example_map)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
In order to improve the consistency of variable handling across types, the
|
|
map variable merging behavior is removed in Terraform v0.12. Because this
|
|
mechanism was driven by command line options rather than configuration, the
|
|
automatic upgrade tool cannot automatically handle it. If you are relying on
|
|
the merging feature, you must reorganize your configuration to use explicit
|
|
merging like in the above example, or else your default map value will be
|
|
entirely overridden by any explicitly-set value.
|
|
|
|
## Upgrading Sentinel policies
|
|
|
|
Terraform Enterprise users of Sentinel will need to complete the below steps to
|
|
upgrade Sentinel to work with Terraform 0.12.
|
|
|
|
1. Update Terraform configurations to 0.12
|
|
1. Update Sentinel policies
|
|
|
|
Because Sentinel is applied across all workspaces in Terraform Enterprise, all
|
|
workspaces must be upgraded to Terraform 0.12 otherwise Sentinel policies will
|
|
fail on versions below 0.12.
|
|
|
|
More details on this upgrade process will be added prior to the final release.
|