Use a slightly modified value renderer from terraform-provider-testing
to display values in the console REPL, as well as outputs from the apply
and outputs subcommands.
Derived from code in this repository, MIT licensed:
https://github.com/apparentlymart/terraform-provider-testing
Note that this is technically a breaking change for the console
subcommand, which would previously error if the user attempted to render
an unknown value (such as an unset variable). This was marked as an
unintentional side effect, with the goal being the new behaviour of
rendering "(unknown)", which is why I changed the behaviour in this
commit.
* terraform: refactor signature of EvalContext.InitProvisioner
Nothing was using the returned provisioners.Interface, so I simplified
the signature.
* terraform: remove provisioner-related EvalTree()s
The various Evals in eval_provisioner were removed from all callers and
replaced with straight-through code.
`NodeValidatableResource.EvalTree()` to `Execute()` was more involved. I
chose to leave the `EvalValidateResource` and `EvalValidateProvisioner`
Eval functions mostly as-is, changing the main function to `.Validate` to
make it clear that these are no longer eval nodes. Eventually I expect
to rename the file (perhaps to just Validate).
* Adding not about data-sources and depends-on for 0.12 users
* Bold
* A little more markdown
* A little more markdown for data_sources in 0.12
* Some iteration based on good feedback
This also unearthed that the marking must happen
earlier in the eval_diff in order to produce a valid plan
(so that the planned marked value matches the marked config
value)
Update tests to match the fix in mitchellh/cli#71, which aligns MockUi
with BasicUi and allows newlines in user input.
We are not using the new ErrorWriter, added in mitchellh/cli#81, as it
does not appear to interact correctly with panicwrap. All error output
from CLI parsing will continue to appear on stdout, not stderr.
Using markedPlannedNewVal caused many test
failures with ignoreChanges, and I noted plannedNewVal
itself is modified in the eval_diff. plannedNewVal
is now marked closer to the change where it needs it.
There is also a test fixture update to remove interpolation warnings.
Mark sensitivity on a value. However, when the value is encoded to send to the
provider to produce a changeset we must remove the marks, so unmark the value
and remark it with the saved path afterwards
When rendering a diff between current state and projected state, we only
show resources and outputs which have changes. However, we show a full
structural diff for these values, which includes all attributes and
blocks for a changed resource or output. The result can be a very long
diff, which makes it difficult to verify what the changed fields are.
This commit adds an experimental concise diff renderer, which suppresses
most unchanged fields, only displaying the most relevant changes and
some identifying context. This means:
- Always show all identifying attributes, initially defined as `id`,
`name`, and `tags`, even if unchanged;
- Only show changed, added, or removed primitive values: `string`,
`number`, or `bool`;
- Only show added or removed elements in unordered collections and
structural types: `map`, `set`, and `object`;
- Show added or removed elements with any surrounding unchanged elements
for sequence types: `list` and `tuple`;
- Only show added or removed nested blocks, or blocks with changed
attributes.
If any attributes, collection elements, or blocks are hidden, a count
is kept and displayed at the end of the parent scope. This ensures that
it is clear that the diff is only displaying a subset of the resource.
The experiment is currently enabled by default, but can be disabled by
setting the TF_X_CONCISE_DIFF environment variable to 0.
In refactoring the force push code when implementing force push
for the Terraform remote backend, a bug was introduced that
meant that backends that don't implement the EnableForcePush
method would still have their state validated. This commit
fixes that, and adds test coverage such that there is a separate
mockRemoteClient that has this method implemented.
When applying a plan, a forced CreateBeforeDestroy may not be set during
the apply walk when downstream resources are no longer present in the
graph. We still need to stick to that plan, and both the
NodeApplyableResourceInstance EvalTree and the individual Eval nodes
need to operate on that planned value.
Ensure that we always check for an existing plan when determining
CreateBeforeDestroy status. This must happen in 2 different code paths
due to the eval node pattern currently in-use. Future refactoring may be
able to unify these code-paths to make this less fragile.
If a resource is forced CreateBeforeDestroy from a dependent resource,
and that dependent has no changes, the plan is changed from
CreateThenDelete to DeleteThenCreate causing an apply error.
Alisdair McDiarmid