Previously we would interpolate the count config (ResourceConfig.RawCount)
only while preparing to dynamic-expand aggregate resource nodes. This is
problematic because we do not dynamic-expand any resource nodes during the
apply walk, and so previously the count value was not available for
interpolation during apply and would result in an error.
Now we interpolate RawCount once for each resource we visit during the
apply walk -- even though that redundantly interpolates the same config
multiple times when count > 1 -- to ensure that it's available by the
time we interpolate any remaining expressions in the config and any
expressions within "connection" and "provisioner" blocks.
This error was masked by us sharing a single RawConfig instance between
the plan and apply walks when "terraform apply" is run with no explicit
plan file argument, but was exposed by the workflow where the plan is
written first to disk since in that case the interpolation result from
during the plan phase is not present in the deflated plan object. For
this reason, the new context test serializes the plan into an in-memory
buffer and reloads it in order to simulate the effect of the two-step
workflow.
Previously we would return the raw error from strconv.ParseInt, which
includes details in its text that expose implementation details and are
thus not helpful to the user.
Instead, we use a locally-defined error message that talks only about
what the caller is expected to know: that count should be parsable as
an integer.
In terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws#2935, we have been cleaning code
duplication by benefiting from the "NormalizeJsonString" present in the "structure" helper.
It appears that tests in the AWS provider are covering more use-cases,
which are added in this work.
Internally, triton-go has changed how it handles errors. We can now get rid of
checking strings for errors, and we have introduced an errors library that
wraps some of the major errors we encounter and test for
We have outgrown the single flat list presentation of providers due to the shear number now present, so we'll move here to a model where the providers are split into a number of categories that each contain a smaller list.
The full list is still included in the body of the main index page for quick access via search, but the categories make for a more accessible navbar for those who are just browsing.
To avoid breaking automation where plugin-path was assumed to be set
permanently, only remove the plugin-path record if it was explicitly set
to and empty string.
The existing prompts were worded as if backend configurations were
named, but they can only really be referenced by their type. Change the
wording to reference them as type "X backend". When migrating state,
refer to the backends as the "previously configured" and "newly
configured", since they will often have the same type.
There was no test checking that Close wsa called on the mock provider.
This fails now since the CloseProviderTransformer isn't using the fully
resolved provider name.
As pointed out in #16987, "factoids" are not really what we're looking for here. The goal of this section is to capture additional context that isn't represented by any of our other section headings, so we'll change this to "Additional Context" to be clearer about what we want here and to avoid a confusing misuse of a quirky English word that not all readers will be familiar with.
Martin Atkins