Fixes#4645
This is something that never worked (even in legacy graphs), but as we
push forward towards encouraging multi-provider usage especially with
things like the Vault data source, I want to make sure we have this
right for 0.8.
When you have a config like this:
```
resource "foo_type" "name" {}
provider "bar" { attr = "${foo_type.name.value}" }
resource "bar_type" "name" {}
```
Then the destruction ordering MUST be:
1. `bar_type`
2. `foo_type`
Since configuring the client for `bar_type` requires accessing data from
`foo_type`. Prior to this PR, these two would be done in parallel. This
properly pushes forward the dependency.
There are more cases I want to test but this is a basic case that is
fixed.
* Allow import of aws_security_groups with more than one source_security_group_id rule
* Add acceptable test for security group with multiple source rules.
When importing an `aws_vpc_peering_connection`, the code assumes that
the account under Terraform control is the initiator (requester) of the
VPC peering request. This holds true when the peering connection is
between two VPCs in the same account, or when the peering connection has
been initiated from the controlled account to another.
However, when the peering connection has been initiated from a foreign
account towards the account under management, importing the peering
connection into the statefile results in values of `peer_vpc_id` and
`vpc_id` being the opposite way round to what they should be, and in the
`peer_owner_id` being set to the managed account's ID rather than the
foreign account's ID.
This patch checks the Accepter and Requester Owner IDs against the AWS
connection's reported owner ID, and reverses the mapping if it is
determined that the VPC peering connection is owned by the foreign
account.
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_plan -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_plan
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_plan (798.75s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 798.835s
Fixes#10597
This disallows any names for variables, modules, etc. starting with
ints. This causes parse errors with the new HIL parser and actually
causes long term ambiguities if we allow this.
I've also updated the upgrade guide to note this as a backwards
compatibility and how people can fix this going forward.
This adds the new resource aws_snapshot_create_volume_permission which
manages the createVolumePermission attribute of snapshots. This allows
granting an AWS account permissions to create a volume from a particular
snapshot. This is often required to allow another account to copy a
private AMI.
The value is only multiplied by the API for topics in non-premium namespaces
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioning -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioningStandard
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioningStandard (378.80s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioningPremium
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioningPremium (655.00s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 1033.874s
AWS allows only the case-sensitive strings `Allow` and `Deny` to appear
in the `Effect` fields of IAM policy documents. Catch deviations from
this, including mis-casing, before hitting the API and generating an
error (the error is a generic 400 and doesn't indicate what part of the
policy doc is invalid).
Mitchell Hashimoto