While the schema Diff fucntion returns a nil diff when creating an empty
(except for id) resource, the Apply function expects the diff to be
initialized and ampty.
PlanResourceChange isn't returning the diff, but rather it is returning
the destired state. If the propsed state results in a nil diff, then,
the propsed state is what should be returned.
Make sure Meta fields are not nil, as the schema package expects those
to be initialised.
An earlier change introduced a new function testConfig to the main code
for this package, which conflicted with a function of the same name in
the test code.
Here we rename the function from the test code, allowing for the more
generally-named testConfig to be the one in the main code.
The "id" field is assumed to always exist, and must have a valid value.
Set "id" to unknown when planning new resource changes to indicate that
it will be computed.
Previously we just left these out of the plan altogether, but in the new
plan types we intentionally include change information for every resource
instance, even if no changes are actually planned, to allow alternative
plan file viewers to show what isn't changing as well as what is.
Managing which function need to be shared between the terraform plugin
and the helper plugin without creating cycles was becoming difficult.
Move all functions related to converting between terraform and proto
type into plugin/convert.
Due to how often the state and plan types are referenced throughout
Terraform, there isn't a great way to switch them out gradually. As a
consequence, this huge commit gets us from the old world to a _compilable_
new world, but still has a large number of known test failures due to
key functionality being stubbed out.
The stubs here are for anything that interacts with providers, since we
now need to do the follow-up work to similarly replace the old
terraform.ResourceProvider interface with its replacement in the new
"providers" package. That work, along with work to fix the remaining
failing tests, will follow in subsequent commits.
The aim here was to replace all references to terraform.State and its
downstream types with states.State, terraform.Plan with plans.Plan,
state.State with statemgr.State, and switch to the new implementations of
the state and plan file formats. However, due to the number of times those
types are used, this also ended up affecting numerous other parts of core
such as terraform.Hook, the backend.Backend interface, and most of the CLI
commands.
Just as with 5861dbf3fc49b19587a31816eb06f511ab861bb4 before, I apologize
in advance to the person who inevitably just found this huge commit while
spelunking through the commit history.
The new helper/plugin package contains the grpc servers for handling the
new plugin protocol
The GRPCProviderServer and GRPCProvisionerServer handle the grpc plugin
protocol, and convert the requests to the legacy schema.Provider and
schema.Provisioner methods.
In order to not require state migrations to be supported in both
MigrateState and StateUpgraders, the legacy provider codepath needs to
handle the StateUpgraders transparently during Refresh.
This adds some of the required shim functions to the schema package.
While this further bloats the already huge package, adding the helpers
here was significantly less disruptive than refactoring types into
separate packages to prevent import cycles.
The majority of tests here are directly adapted from existing schema
tests to provide as many known good values to the shims as possible.
It turns out that state upgrades need to be handled differently since
providers are going to be backwards compatible. This means that new
state upgrades may still be stored in the flatmap format when used wih
terraform 0.11. Because we can't account for the specific version which
could produce a legacy state, all future state upgrades need to record
the schema types for decoding.
Rather than defining a single Upgrade function for states, we now have a
list of functions, each of which handle upgrading a specific version to
the next. In practice this isn't much different from the way many
resources implement upgrades themselves, with a separate function for
each version dispatched from the MigrateState function. The only added
burden is the recording of the schema type, and we intend to supply
tools and helper function to prevent the need to copy the entire
existing schema in all cases.
This is the provider-side UpgradeState implementation for a particular
resource. This new function will be called to upgrade a saved state with
an old schema version to the current schema.
UpgradeState also requires a record of the last schema and version that
could have been stored as a flatmapped state. If the stored state is in
the legacy flatmap format, this will allow the provider to properly
decode the flatmapped state into the expected structure for the new json
encoded state. If the stored state's version is below that of the
LegacySchema.Version value, it will first be processed by the legacy
MigrateState function.
The update protocol shims will also check for this this, but eventually
"id" will only be a normal attribute, and we shouldn't have to special
case this.
When converting a legacy schemaMap to a configschema, we need to add
"id" as a required attribute to top-level resources if it's not
declared.
The "id" field will be required to interoperate with the legacy helper
schema, since the presence of an id was used to indicate the existence
of a resource.
The "config" package is no longer used and will be removed as part
of the 0.12 release cleanup. Since configschema is part of the
"new world" of configuration modelling, it makes more sense for
it to live as a subdirectory of the newer "configs" package.
Due to how deeply the configuration types go into Terraform Core, there
isn't a great way to switch out to HCL2 gradually. As a consequence, this
huge commit gets us from the old state to a _compilable_ new state, but
does not yet attempt to fix any tests and has a number of known missing
parts and bugs. We will continue to iterate on this in forthcoming
commits, heading back towards passing tests and making Terraform
fully-functional again.
The three main goals here are:
- Use the configuration models from the "configs" package instead of the
older models in the "config" package, which is now deprecated and
preserved only to help us write our migration tool.
- Do expression inspection and evaluation using the functionality of the
new "lang" package, instead of the Interpolator type and related
functionality in the main "terraform" package.
- Represent addresses of various objects using types in the addrs package,
rather than hand-constructed strings. This is not critical to support
the above, but was a big help during the implementation of these other
points since it made it much more explicit what kind of address is
expected in each context.
Since our new packages are built to accommodate some future planned
features that are not yet implemented (e.g. the "for_each" argument on
resources, "count"/"for_each" on modules), and since there's still a fair
amount of functionality still using old-style APIs, there is a moderate
amount of shimming here to connect new assumptions with old, hopefully in
a way that makes it easier to find and eliminate these shims later.
I apologize in advance to the person who inevitably just found this huge
commit while spelunking through the commit history.
The new config loader requires some steps to happen in a different
order, particularly in regard to knowing the schema in order to
decode the configuration.
Here we lean directly on the configschema package, rather than
on helper/schema.Backend as before, because it's generally
sufficient for our needs here and this prepares us for the
helper/schema package later moving out into its own repository
to seed a "plugin SDK".
We will need access to this information in order to render interactive
input prompts, and it will also be useful in returning schema information
to external tools such as text editors that have autocomplete-like
functionality.
One of the tests in this package doesn't work when the tests are run as
root - like inside of a Docker container. The test is still useful to
specify `pathorcontents` behavior when a file is not readable, so it's
better to skip than just delete it. See linked issue for further
disussion.
Closes#7707
When checking if a ResourceDiff key is valid, allow for keys that exist
on sub-blocks. This allows things like diff.Clear to be called on
sub-block fields, instead of just on top-level fields.
The `remote` backend config contains an attribute that is defined as a `*schema.Set`, but currently only `string` values are accepted as the `config` attribute is defined as a `schema.TypeMap`.
Additionally the `b.Validate()` method wasn’t called to prevent a possible panic in case of unexpected configurations being passed to `b.Configure()`.
This commit is a bit of a hack to be able to support this in the 0.11 series. The 0.12 series will have proper support, so when merging 0.12 this should be reverted again.
While this initial implementation is a very simple wrapper function, implementing this in the helper/resource package provides some downstream benefits:
* Provides a standard interface for plugin developers to enable parallel acceptance testing
* Existing plugins can simply convert resource.Test to resource.ParallelTest references (as appropriate) to enable the functionality, rather than worrying about additional line(s) to each acceptance test function or TestCase
* Potential enhancements to ParallelTest (e.g. adding an environment variable to skip enabling the behavior) are consistently propagated
We already had the functionality to make resources deprecated, which was
used when migrating resources to data sources, but the functionality was
unexported, so only the schema package could do it. Now it's exported,
meaning providers can mark entire resources as deprecated. I also added
a test in hopefully-the-right place?
This adds the Taint field to the acceptance testing framework, allowing
the ability to pre-taint resources at the beginning of a particular
TestStep. This can be useful for when an explicit ForceNew is required
for a specific resource for troubleshooting things like diff mismatches,
etc.
The field accepts resource addresses as a list of strings. To keep
things simple for the time being, only addresses in the root module are
accepted. If we ever want to expand this past that, I'd be almost
inclined to add some facilities to the core terraform package to help
translate actual module resource addresses (ie:
module.foo.module.bar.some_resource.baz) into the correct state, versus
the current convention in some acceptance testing facilities that take
the module address as a list of strings (ie: []string{"root", "foo",
"bar"}).
James Bardin