* provider/aws: Allow `source_ids` in `aws_db_event_subscription` to be
Updatable
Fixes#7809
This commit adds support for `source_ids` to be updated rather than
forcing new each time. Unfortunately, it must range over the difference
in the source_ids and add and remove them 1 at a time. AWS does not
support batch updating source_ids
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSDBEventSubscription_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSDBEventSubscription_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSDBEventSubscription_basicUpdate
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBEventSubscription_basicUpdate (1277.87s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSDBEventSubscription_withSourceIds
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBEventSubscription_withSourceIds (1012.96s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws
2290.844s
```
* Update resource_aws_db_event_subscription.go
* provider/aws: Adds an acceptance test that makes sure that manual deletions mean a non-empty plan
* provider/aws: Adds an acceptance test to prove that manual deletion causes a non-empty plan
- Minor update to remove some posisbly confusing discussion about
pre 0.7 seperate binaries for plugins, and link to internal
plugins section for more clarification of how plugins are
handled in 0.7+.
This commit adds a function which composes a series of TestFuncs, but
will run all tests before returning an error, unlike ComposeTestFunc.
This is useful when verifying contents of state in acceptance tests and
it is desirable to see all the failing cases in one run for slow
resources.
* provider/aws: Add failing ETC + notifications test
* tidy up the docs some
* provider/aws: Update ElasticTranscoder to allow empty notifications, removing notifications, etc
When you need to enable monitoring for Redshift, you need to create the
correct policy in the bucket for logging. This needs to have the
Redshift Account ID for a given region. This data source provides a
handy lookup for this
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/mgmt/db-auditing.html#db-auditing-enable-logging
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws
% TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRedshiftAccountId_basic' 2 ↵ ✹ ✭
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
/Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/stringer
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/08/16 14:39:35 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSRedshiftAccountId_basic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRedshiftAccountId_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRedshiftAccountId_basic (19.47s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 19.483s
or availability_zone
Fixes#8000
There was a hard coded panic in the code!!!
```
panic(
fmt.Sprintf(
"Must set one of:\navailability_zone %#v\nsubnet_id: %#v",
m["availability_zone"],
m["subnet_id"])
)
```
This was causing issues when we set neither an availability zone or a subnet id.
This has been removed and is now handled with an error rather than a panic.
This was what happened with the new test before the fix:
```
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_brokenLaunchSpecification
panic: Must set one of:
availability_zone ""
subnet_id: ""
goroutine 129 [running]:
panic(0x11377a0, 0xc8202abfc0)
/opt/boxen/homebrew/Cellar/go/1.6.2/libexec/src/runtime/panic.go:481 +0x3e6
github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws.hashLaunchSpecification(0x11361a0, 0xc8202e07e0, 0xc800000001)
/Users/stacko/Code/go/src/github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws/resource_aws_spot_fleet_request.go:953 +0x685
github.com/hashicorp/terraform/helper/schema.(*Set).hash(0xc82005ae00, 0x11361a0, 0xc8202e07e0, 0x0, 0x0)
/Users/stacko/Code/go/src/github.com/hashicorp/terraform/helper/schema/set.go:180 +0x40
github.com/hashicorp/terraform/helper/schema.(*Set).add(0xc82005ae00, 0x11361a0, 0xc8202e07e0, 0xc820276900, 0x0, 0x0)
```
The test then ran fine after the fix:
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_brokenLaunchSpecification'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
/Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/stringer
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/08/16 08:03:18 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_brokenLaunchSpecification -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_brokenLaunchSpecification
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_brokenLaunchSpecification (32.37s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 32.384s
```
Full test run looks as follows:
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
/Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/stringer
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/08/16 08:04:34 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_basic (33.78s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_brokenLaunchSpecification
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_brokenLaunchSpecification (33.59s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_launchConfiguration
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_launchConfiguration (35.26s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_CannotUseEmptyKeyName
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotFleetRequest_CannotUseEmptyKeyName (0.00s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 102.648s
```
The whitespace in the documentation for `aws_appautoscaling_policy` was very confusing. I believe it was due to a mix up of tabs and spaces. It's much prettier and easier to read now.
This commit adds the `state rm` command for removing an address from
state. It is the result of a rebase from pull-request #5953 which was
lost at some point during the Terraform 0.7 feature branch merges.
This data source provides access during configuration to the ID of the
AWS account for the connection to AWS. It is primarily useful for
interpolating into policy documents, for example when creating the
policy for an ELB or ALB access log bucket.
This will need revisiting and further testing once the work for
AssumeRole is integrated.
Paul Stack