Fixes: #14535
When in a `restricted` cloud, we should fall back to the old method of
tagging. Before this change we saw the following:
```
% terraform apply ✭
aws_instance.foo: Creating...
ami: "" => "ami-0fa3c42c"
associate_public_ip_address: "" => "<computed>"
availability_zone: "" => "<computed>"
ebs_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
ephemeral_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
instance_state: "" => "<computed>"
instance_type: "" => "m1.small"
ipv6_address_count: "" => "<computed>"
ipv6_addresses.#: "" => "<computed>"
key_name: "" => "<computed>"
network_interface.#: "" => "<computed>"
network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>"
placement_group: "" => "<computed>"
primary_network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>"
private_dns: "" => "<computed>"
private_ip: "" => "<computed>"
public_dns: "" => "<computed>"
public_ip: "" => "<computed>"
root_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
security_groups.#: "" => "<computed>"
source_dest_check: "" => "true"
subnet_id: "" => "<computed>"
tags.%: "" => "1"
tags.foo: "" => "bar"
tenancy: "" => "<computed>"
volume_tags.%: "" => "<computed>"
vpc_security_group_ids.#: "" => "<computed>"
aws_instance.foo: Creation complete (ID: i-0009f227ae24791b9)
Apply complete! Resources: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 destroyed.
% terraform plan ✭
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_instance.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: i-0009f227ae24791b9)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
~ aws_instance.foo
tags.%: "0" => "1"
tags.foo: "" => "bar"
Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
After this patch, we see the following:
```
% terraform apply ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
aws_instance.foo: Creating...
ami: "" => "ami-0fa3c42c"
associate_public_ip_address: "" => "<computed>"
availability_zone: "" => "<computed>"
ebs_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
ephemeral_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
instance_state: "" => "<computed>"
instance_type: "" => "m1.small"
ipv6_address_count: "" => "<computed>"
ipv6_addresses.#: "" => "<computed>"
key_name: "" => "<computed>"
network_interface.#: "" => "<computed>"
network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>"
placement_group: "" => "<computed>"
primary_network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>"
private_dns: "" => "<computed>"
private_ip: "" => "<computed>"
public_dns: "" => "<computed>"
public_ip: "" => "<computed>"
root_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
security_groups.#: "" => "<computed>"
source_dest_check: "" => "true"
subnet_id: "" => "<computed>"
tags.%: "" => "1"
tags.foo: "" => "bar"
tenancy: "" => "<computed>"
volume_tags.%: "" => "<computed>"
vpc_security_group_ids.#: "" => "<computed>"
aws_instance.foo: Creation complete (ID: i-04cd122e28f167a14)
Apply complete! Resources: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 destroyed.
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_instance.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: i-04cd122e28f167a14)
No changes. Infrastructure is up-to-date.
This means that Terraform did not detect any differences between your
configuration and real physical resources that exist. As a result, Terraform
doesn't need to do anything.
```
Fixes: #14530
When we found an update of IPv6 cidr block, we first tried to
disassociate the old cidr block association. This caused errors if there
was none, it threw an error, as we passed an empty associationId:
```
* aws_subnet.public_subnet.0: InvalidSubnetCidrBlockAssociationId.Malformed: The subnet CIDR block with association ID is malformed
status code: 400, request id: f438f468-9ca4-4000-ba78-63a0f25d390a
* aws_subnet.public_subnet[1]: 1 error(s) occurred:
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSubnet_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/05/16 18:28:45 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSSubnet_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSubnet_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSubnet_importBasic (55.40s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSubnet_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSubnet_basic (53.62s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSubnet_ipv6
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSubnet_ipv6 (125.87s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSubnet_enableIpv6
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSubnet_enableIpv6 (88.88s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 323.787s
```
Fixes: #14361
An IPv6 CIDR block is option and can be added *after* a subnet has been
created. Therefore, we should set it to `Computed: true`
Otherwise, a manually created IPv6 association will be removed on the
next terraform run
* Propagate AWS CodePipeline action roles
* Add acceptance test for AWS CodePipeline action roles
* Isolate AWS CodePipeline service role acceptance test
The existing "tag" field on autoscaling groups is very limited in that it
cannot be used in conjunction with interpolation preventing from adding
dynamic tag entries.
Other AWS resources don't have this restriction on tags because they work
directly on the map type.
AWS autoscaling groups on the other hand have an additional field
"propagate_at_launch" which is not usable with a pure map type.
This fixes it by introducing an additional field called "tags" which
allows specifying a list of maps. This preserves the possibility to
declare tags as with the "tag" field but additionally allows to
construct lists of maps using interpolation syntax.
Fixes: #14503
Changes to root_block_device were not picked up as we had a hash func to
return 0. We changed from set -> list as we only allow 1 value and
immediately we can get changes propagating
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSLaunchConfiguration_updateRootBlockDevice'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/05/15 19:27:39 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSLaunchConfiguration_updateRootBlockDevice -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSLaunchConfiguration_updateRootBlockDevice
--- PASS: TestAccAWSLaunchConfiguration_updateRootBlockDevice (51.12s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 51.140s
```
Fixes: #14006Fixes: #14464
IPv6 wasn't supported for adding routes to the internet gateway.
Resulted in a message as follows:
```
Error creating route: MissingParameter: The request must contain the parameter destinationCidrBlock or destinationIpv6CidrBlock
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRoute_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/05/15 11:50:43 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSRoute_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute_basic (67.27s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute_ipv6Support
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute_ipv6Support (59.35s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute_ipv6ToInternetGateway
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute_ipv6ToInternetGateway (67.39s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute_changeCidr
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute_changeCidr (103.68s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute_noopdiff
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute_noopdiff (194.32s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute_doesNotCrashWithVPCEndpoint
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute_doesNotCrashWithVPCEndpoint (71.36s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 563.397s
```
The acceptance tests for spot_instance_requests were showing falures as
follows:
```
------- Stdout: -------
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_basic
--- FAIL: TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_basic (100.40s)
testing.go:280: Step 0 error: After applying this step, the plan was not empty:
DIFF:
UPDATE: aws_spot_instance_request.foo
volume_tags.%: "" => "<computed>"
```
This was because we were setting volume_tags as computed and thus the
diff. We needed to override the schema to make sure that it was not
being computed - it's only aws_instance that needs computed tags because
of EBS volumes
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/05/15 10:41:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_basic (86.93s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_withBlockDuration
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_withBlockDuration (97.47s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_vpc
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_vpc (234.56s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_SubnetAndSG
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSpotInstanceRequest_SubnetAndSG (146.16s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 565.131s
```
Radek Simko