provider/aws: Fall back to old tagging mechanism for AWS gov and aws China (#14627)
Fixes: #14535 When in a `restricted` cloud, we should fall back to the old method of tagging. Before this change we saw the following: ``` % terraform apply ✭ aws_instance.foo: Creating... ami: "" => "ami-0fa3c42c" associate_public_ip_address: "" => "<computed>" availability_zone: "" => "<computed>" ebs_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>" ephemeral_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>" instance_state: "" => "<computed>" instance_type: "" => "m1.small" ipv6_address_count: "" => "<computed>" ipv6_addresses.#: "" => "<computed>" key_name: "" => "<computed>" network_interface.#: "" => "<computed>" network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>" placement_group: "" => "<computed>" primary_network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>" private_dns: "" => "<computed>" private_ip: "" => "<computed>" public_dns: "" => "<computed>" public_ip: "" => "<computed>" root_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>" security_groups.#: "" => "<computed>" source_dest_check: "" => "true" subnet_id: "" => "<computed>" tags.%: "" => "1" tags.foo: "" => "bar" tenancy: "" => "<computed>" volume_tags.%: "" => "<computed>" vpc_security_group_ids.#: "" => "<computed>" aws_instance.foo: Creation complete (ID: i-0009f227ae24791b9) Apply complete! Resources: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 destroyed. % terraform plan ✭ Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan... The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be persisted to local or remote state storage. aws_instance.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: i-0009f227ae24791b9) The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below. Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read. Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when "apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute. ~ aws_instance.foo tags.%: "0" => "1" tags.foo: "" => "bar" Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy. ``` After this patch, we see the following: ``` % terraform apply ✹ ✭ [WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider. If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin. See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html aws_instance.foo: Creating... ami: "" => "ami-0fa3c42c" associate_public_ip_address: "" => "<computed>" availability_zone: "" => "<computed>" ebs_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>" ephemeral_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>" instance_state: "" => "<computed>" instance_type: "" => "m1.small" ipv6_address_count: "" => "<computed>" ipv6_addresses.#: "" => "<computed>" key_name: "" => "<computed>" network_interface.#: "" => "<computed>" network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>" placement_group: "" => "<computed>" primary_network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>" private_dns: "" => "<computed>" private_ip: "" => "<computed>" public_dns: "" => "<computed>" public_ip: "" => "<computed>" root_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>" security_groups.#: "" => "<computed>" source_dest_check: "" => "true" subnet_id: "" => "<computed>" tags.%: "" => "1" tags.foo: "" => "bar" tenancy: "" => "<computed>" volume_tags.%: "" => "<computed>" vpc_security_group_ids.#: "" => "<computed>" aws_instance.foo: Creation complete (ID: i-04cd122e28f167a14) Apply complete! Resources: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 destroyed. % terraform plan ✹ ✭ [WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider. If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin. See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan... The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be persisted to local or remote state storage. aws_instance.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: i-04cd122e28f167a14) No changes. Infrastructure is up-to-date. This means that Terraform did not detect any differences between your configuration and real physical resources that exist. As a result, Terraform doesn't need to do anything. ```
This commit is contained in:
parent
66b7a24b4f
commit
62347ea833
|
@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ func resourceAwsInstanceUpdate(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) error {
|
|||
restricted := meta.(*AWSClient).IsGovCloud() || meta.(*AWSClient).IsChinaCloud()
|
||||
|
||||
if d.HasChange("tags") {
|
||||
if !d.IsNewResource() || !restricted {
|
||||
if !d.IsNewResource() || restricted {
|
||||
if err := setTags(conn, d); err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue