The providers command has been refactored to use the modern provider types and
ProviderRequirements() functions. This resulted in a breaking change to
the output: it no longer outputs the providers by module and no longer
prints `(inherited)` or `(from state)` to show why a provider is
included. We decided that at this time it was best to stick with the
existing functions and make this change, but if we get feedback from the
community we will revisit.
Additional tests to exercise providers in modules and providers from
state have been included.
This PR adds iteration through any provider configuration blocks in the
config in addProviderRequirements().
A stale comment (of mine!) would leave one expecting the
module.ProviderRequirements to include any requirements from provider
configs. The comment was inaccurate and has been updated.
This fixes several bugs:
- `substr("abc", 0, 0)` would previously return `"abc"`, despite the
length argument being `0`. This has been changed to return an empty
string when length is zero.
- `ceil(1/0)` and `floor(1/0)` would previously return a large integer
value, rather than infinity. This has been fixed.
Stop evaluating count and for each if they aren't set in the config.
Remove "Resource" from the function names, as they are also now used
with modules.
While we don't have any expansion info during validation, we can try to
evaluate variable expressions to catch some basic errors. Do this by
creating module instance RepetitionData with unknown values. This
unfortunately will still miss the incorrect usage of count/each values,
but that would require the module call's each mode, which is not
available at this time.
The variable nodes are not only used during plan and apply, so remove
those from there names. The "plan" node is now
`nodeExpandModuleVariable` and the "apply" node is now just
`nodeModuleVariable`.
Remove unnecessary methods, as the nodeModuleVariable is no longer used
in the full graph transformations.
The dag Update messages were not particularly helpful in the debugging
of terraform, and since we're going to be relying on DynamicExpand to an
even greater extent, this will eliminate a log of extra log output.
NodeModuleRemoved is redundant now with the concept of
nodeCloseModule, so we can replace it within the graph. This does mean
that nodeCloseModule needs to know if it's evaluating an orphaned module
that can't be expanded, but the overhead to checking this isn't too
bad.
Now that nodeModuleClose is referenceable, and we can ensure it's always
in the graph at the correct time, we can eliminate the need to connect
each resource to every single node within a module it references, and
instead connect only to the nodeModuleClose, which acts as the module
root. Since module expansion can cause exponential growth in the number
of edges in graphs, this will help with performance problems when
transforming and reducing these graphs by eliminating the bulk of
redundant edges. This will also help with general debugging, making the
graphs easier to read.
A proposed pull request to the AWS provider would change the import behavior of
`aws_security_group`. This preemptive change will help keep the docs accurate if
that gets merged.
Due to other pressures at the time this was implemented, it was tested
only indirectly through integration tests in other packages. This now
introduces tests for the two main entry points on MemoizeSource.
Due to other pressures at the time this was implemented, it was tested
only indirectly through integration tests in other packages.
This now introduces tests for the two main entry points on the
MultiSource, along with its provider-address pattern matching logic.
This does not yet include thorough tests for
ParseMultiSourceMatchingPatterns, because that function still needs some
adjustments to do the same case folding as for normal provider address
parsing, which will follow in a latter commit along with suitable tests.
With that said, the tests added here do _indirectly_ test the happy path
of ParseMultiSourceMatchingPatterns, so we have some incomplete testing
of that function in the meantime.
Earlier on in the stubbing of this package we realized that it wasn't
going to be possible to populate the authentication-related bits for all
packages because the relevant metadata just isn't available for packages
that are already local.
However, we just moved ahead with that awkward design at the time because
we needed to get other work done, and so we've been mostly producing
PackageMeta values with all-zeros hashes and just ignoring them entirely
as a temporary workaround.
This is a first step towards what is hopefully a more intuitive model:
authentication is an optional thing in a PackageMeta that is currently
populated only for packages coming from a registry.
So far this still just models checking a SHA256 hash, which is not a
sufficient set of checks for a real release but hopefully the "real"
implementation is a natural iteration of this starting point, and if not
then at least this interim step is a bit more honest about the fact that
Authentication will not be populated on every PackageMeta.
Fred