The external api provided here is simply
dag.Graph.SetDebugWriter(io.Writer). When a writer is provided to a
Graph, it will immediately encode itself to the stream, and subsequently
encode any additional transformations to the graph. This will allow
easier logging of graph transformations without writing complete graphs
to the logs at every step. Since the marshalGraph can also be dot
encoded, this will allow translation from the JSON logs to dot graphs.
To maintain the same output, the Graph.Dot implementation needs to be
aware of GraphNodeDotter. Copy the interface into the dag package, and
make the Dot marshaler aware of which nodes implemented the interface.
This way we can remove most of the remaining dot code from terraform.
The dot format generation was done with a mix of code from the terraform
package and the dot package. Unify the dot generation code, and it into
the dag package.
Use an intermediate structure to allow a dag.Graph to marshal itself
directly. This structure will be ablt to marshal directly to JSON, or be
translated to dot format. This was we can record more information about
the graph in the debug logs, and provide a way to translate those logged
structures to dot, which is convenient for viewing the graphs.
This will detect computed counts (which we don't currently support) and
change the error to be more informative that we don't allow computed
counts. Prior to this, the error would instead be something like
`strconv.ParseInt: "${var.foo}" cannot be parsed as int`.
Fixes#10042Fixes#9989
Another panic was found with this resource. IT essentially was causing a
panic when no certificates were found. This was due to the casting of
status to []string
There are times when there are no statuses passed in. Made the error
message a lot more generic now rather than having something like this
```
No certificate with statuses [] for domain mytestdomain.com found in this region.
```
This now becomes:
```
No certificate for domain mytestdomain.com found in this region.
```
Also, added a test to show that the panic is gone
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAwsAcmCertificateDataSource_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/11 15:11:33 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAwsAcmCertificateDataSource_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAwsAcmCertificateDataSource_noMatchReturnsError
--- PASS: TestAccAwsAcmCertificateDataSource_noMatchReturnsError (6.07s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws6.094s
```
* provider/azurerm: allow updating of lb_rule resource
* check if rule is being updated rather than assuming created
* added test to cover guard against multiple rules with the same name
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run "TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_" -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_basic (157.45s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_removal
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_removal (163.67s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_inconsistentReads
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_inconsistentReads (150.00s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_update
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_update (164.20s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_duplicateRules
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_duplicateRules (137.51s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 772.846s
* provider/azurerm: allow updating of lb_nat_rule resource
* check if NAT rule is being updated rather than assuming created
* added test to cover guard against multiple NAT rules with the same name
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run "TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule" -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_basic (148.48s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_removal
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_removal (163.48s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_update
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_update (176.97s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_duplicate
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_duplicate (136.36s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 625.301s
* provider/azurerm: allow updating of lb_probe resource
* check if probe is being updated rather than assuming created
* added test to cover guard against multiple probes with the same name
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run "TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe" -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_basic (134.53s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_removal
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_removal (168.06s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_update
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_update (175.99s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_duplicate
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_duplicate (139.01s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 617.598s
* provider/azurerm: allow updating of lb_nat_pool resource
* check if NAT pool is being updated rather than assuming created
* added test to cover guard against multiple NAT pools with the same name
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run "TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool" -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_basic (146.52s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_removal
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_removal (158.34s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_update
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_update (174.05s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_duplicate
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_duplicate (136.94s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 615.866s
* allow underscore in database_name [redshift]
Fixes#10009
* Added Test Cases To Validate Redshift DBName
* Remove Old Test Cases Regarding Redshift DBName Validation
* Added More Test Cases For Redshift DBName
This turns the new graphs on by default and puts the old graphs behind a
flag `-Xlegacy-graph`. This effectively inverts the current 0.7.x
behavior with the new graphs.
We've incubated most of these for a few weeks now. We've found issues
and we've fixed them and we've been using these graphs internally for
awhile without any major issue. Its time to default them on and get them
part of a beta.
James Bardin