* fixed broken link
* update one more link
* explicitly define map and change ami to trusty
* remove map definition
* added note about default storage type for aws_db_instance
* added note about default storage type for aws_db_instance
* revert changes to conform with master
It looks like the copy_options value was fat fingered from the
compression_format parameter - I don't believe that GZIP is a valid value for
copy_options, at least based on the documentation.
Adds a link to the documentation and adds a more realistic (and harmless) value
for the copy_options parameter.
This makes it much more directly obvious what `aws_key_pair` does by saying the user *does* provide the key-pair of some kind and that all `aws_key_pair` does is register that public key with an optional name in AWS.
According to the validator, the only acceptable values are 'cpu' and
'memory' (both lower case).
73f4acf041/builtin/providers/aws/validators.go (L722):L725
Updating the docs so that this example works out of the box.
* helper/schema: Add custom Timeout block for resources
* refactor DefaultTimeout to suuport multiple types. Load meta in Refresh from Instance State
* update vpc but it probably wont last anyway
* refactor test into table test for more cases
* rename constant keys
* refactor configdecode
* remove VPC demo
* remove comments
* remove more comments
* refactor some
* rename timeKeys to timeoutKeys
* remove note
* documentation/resources: Document the Timeout block
* document timeouts
* have a test case that covers 'hours'
* restore a System default timeout of 20 minutes, instead of 0
* restore system default timeout of 20 minutes, refactor tests, add test method to handle system default
* rename timeout key constants
* test applying timeout to state
* refactor test
* Add resource Diff test
* clarify docs
* update to use constants
This feature allows sending a notification to either an SQS queue or an
SNS topic when an error occurs running an AWS Lambda function.
This fixes#10630.
* provider/aws: New resource codepipeline
* Vendor aws/codepipeline
* Add tests
* Add docs
* Bump codepipeline to v1.6.25
* Adjustments based on feedback
* Force new resource on ID change
* Improve tests
* Switch update to read
Since we don't require a second pass, only do a read.
* Skip tests if GITHUB_TOKEN is not set
* Added new resource aws_elastic_beanstalk_application_version.
* Changing bucket and key to required.
* Update to use d.Id() directly in DescribeApplicationVersions.
* Checking err to make sure that the application version is successfully deleted.
* Update `version_label` to `Computed: true`.
* provider/aws: Updating to python solution stack
* provider/aws: Beanstalk App Version delete source
The Elastic Beanstalk API call to delete `application_version` resource
should not delete the s3 bundle, as this object is managed by another
Terraform resource
* provider/aws: Update application version docs
* Fix application version test
* Add `version_label` update test
Adds test that fails after rebasing branch onto v0.8.x. `version_label`
changes do not update the `aws_elastic_beanstalk_environment` resource.
* `version_label` changes to update environment
* Prevent unintended delete of `application_version`
Prevents an `application_version` used by multiple environments from
being deleted.
* Add `force_delete` attribute
* Update documentation
We now enable the final_snapshot of aws_rds_cluster by default. This is
a continuation of the work in #11668
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRDSCluster_takeFinalSnapshot'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/02/04 13:19:52 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSRDSCluster_takeFinalSnapshot -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRDSCluster_takeFinalSnapshot
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRDSCluster_takeFinalSnapshot (141.59s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 141.609s
```
I lost a few hours figuring out the right way to describe an ARN for an API
Gateway resource. Specifically I translated the example poorly since I didn't
realize I had to append the path onto the end of the ARN.
Adds two links to an Amazon documentation page describing the format for API
Gateway ARN's. Adds an additional path component to the ARN example so you can
see you need to specify paths.
* Add aws dms vendoring
* Add aws dms endpoint resource
* Add aws dms replication instance resource
* Add aws dms replication subnet group resource
* Add aws dms replication task resource
* Fix aws dms resource go vet errors
* Review fixes: Add id validators for all resources. Add validator for endpoint engine_name.
* Add aws dms resources to importability list
* Review fixes: Add aws dms iam role dependencies to test cases
* Review fixes: Adjustments for handling input values
* Add aws dms replication subnet group tagging
* Fix aws dms subnet group doesn't use standard error for resource not found
* Missed update of aws dms vendored version
* Add aws dms certificate resource
* Update aws dms resources to force new for immutable attributes
* Fix tests failing on subnet deletion by adding explicit dependencies. Combine import tests with basic tests to cut down runtime.
* provider/aws: Update Application Auto Scaling service model
- Add support for automatically scaling an Amazon EC2 Spot fleet.
* Remove duplicate policy_type check.
* Test creating a scalable target for a splot fleet request.
* Test creating a scaling policy for a splot fleet request.
* Update resource docs to support scaling an Amazon EC2 Spot fleet.
- aws_appautoscaling_policy
- aws_appautoscaling_target
* Remove arn attribute from aws_appautoscaling_target
- No arn is generated or returned for this resource.
* Remove optional name attribute from aws_appautoscaling_target
- ScalableTargets do not have a name
- I think this was copied from aws_appautoscaling_policy
* AWS Application Autoscaling resource documentation tweaks
- include a target resource in the policy example
- sort attributes by alpha
- fixup markdown
- add spaces to test config
Adds tag support to the `aws_dynamodb_table` resource. Also adds a test for the resource, and a test to ensure that the tags are populated correctly from a resource import.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSDynamoDBTable_tags'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/02/01 15:35:00 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSDynamoDBTable_tags -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSDynamoDBTable_tags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDynamoDBTable_tags (28.69s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 28.713s
```
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSDynamoDbTable_importTags'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/02/01 15:39:49 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSDynamoDbTable_importTags -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSDynamoDbTable_importTags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDynamoDbTable_importTags (30.62s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 30.645s
```
Fixes: #11587
Adds a small note to the `initial_lifecycle_hook` to note that this will
only work when creating a new Autoscaling group. For everything else,
you need to use the `aws_autoscaling_lifecycle_hook` resource
* Added Step Function Activity & Step Function State Machine
* Added SFN State Machine documentation
* Added aws_sfn_activity & documentation
* Allowed import of sfn resources
* Added more checks on tests, fixed documentation
* Handled the update case of a SFN function (might be already deleting)
* Removed the State Machine import test file
* Fixed the eventual consistency of the read after delete for SFN functions
* added server_side_encryption to s3_bucket_object resource including associated acceptance test and documentation.
* got acceptance tests passing.
* made server_side_encryption a computed attribute and only set kms_key_id attribute if an S3 non-default master key is in use.
* ensured kms api is only interrogated if required.
Implementing vpc_peering_connection_accept.
Additions from @ewbankkit:
Rename 'aws_vpc_peering_connection_accept' to 'aws_vpc_peering_connection_accepter'.
Get it working reusing functionality from 'aws_vpc_peering_connection' resource.
- When creating an `iam_instance_profile` you will receive an error if you have multiple roles defined but have not increased your AWS limit for the number of roles you can assign to an `iam_instance_profile`.
- See more on defaults: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/reference_iam-limits.html
* Added aws_api_gateway_integration request_templates in the documentation
* Added aws_api_gateway_integration_response response_templates in the documentation
* provider/aws: Remove hardcoded https from the ecr repository
When the ECR resource was created, we hardcoded the repository URL to
start with https://
This was a mistake as all interaction with the repository now must
include a replace function for the https:// to "" for this to be usable
We need to note this change in the backward incompatibilities
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEcrRepository_' ✭
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/01/20 14:37:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSEcrRepository_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEcrRepository_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEcrRepository_importBasic (20.46s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEcrRepository_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEcrRepository_basic (18.77s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 39.251s
```
* Update ecr_repository.html.markdown
Updates ECS task_definition documentation, and schema validation functions to match the AWS API documentation.
Updates ECS service documentation, and schema validation functions match the AWS API documentation.
```
1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_elasticache_replication_group.cache: Error creating Elasticache Replication Group: InvalidParameterCombination: Expected a parameter group of family redis3.2 but found one of family redis2.8
status code: 400, request id: 9e6563a4-dd91-11e6-bc8b-ed011a44f429
```
Example code fails a validation:
```
Errors:
* aws_elasticache_replication_group.cache: "replication_group_id" must contain from 1 to 20 alphanumeric characters or hyphens
```
statistic
Fixes: #11189
This introduces a new parameter and makes an existing parameter from
`required` to `optional` as both cannot be specified together
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSCloudWatchMetricAlarm_' 2 ↵ ✹ ✭
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/01/13 11:25:24 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSCloudWatchMetricAlarm_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSCloudWatchMetricAlarm_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCloudWatchMetricAlarm_importBasic (19.80s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSCloudWatchMetricAlarm_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCloudWatchMetricAlarm_basic (20.42s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSCloudWatchMetricAlarm_extendedStatistic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCloudWatchMetricAlarm_extendedStatistic (18.92s)
PASS
```
* provider/aws: New Resource - aws_codedeploy_deployment_config
* provider/aws: Adding acceptance tests for new
aws_codedeploy_deployment_config resource
* provider/aws: Documentation for the aws_codedeploy_deployment_config resource
* Update codedeploy_deployment_config.html.markdown
aws_api_gateway_integration_response
This continues the work carried out in #10696
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSAPIGatewayIntegrationResponse_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/01/03 14:18:46 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSAPIGatewayIntegrationResponse_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSAPIGatewayIntegrationResponse_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAPIGatewayIntegrationResponse_basic (57.33s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws57.352s
```
Fixes:#10902
AWS introduced a change to the Mount Target DNS Name to remove the
availability_zone from it -
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2016/12/simplified-mounting-of-amazon-efs-file-systems/
This was because there used to be a limit of 1 mount target per AZ -
this has been raised.
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEFSMountTarget_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/01/04 10:45:35 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSEFSMountTarget_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEFSMountTarget_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSMountTarget_importBasic (236.19s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEFSMountTarget_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSMountTarget_basic (445.52s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEFSMountTarget_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSMountTarget_disappears (228.31s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 910.044s
```
Fixes#8455, #5390
This add a new `no_device` attribute to `ephemeral_block_device` block,
which allows users omit ephemeral devices from AMI's predefined block
device mappings, which is useful for EBS-only instance types.
* add rds db for opsworks
* switched to stack in vpc
* implement update method
* add docs
* implement and document force new resource behavior
* implement retry for update and delete
* add test that forces new resource
* Add new aws_vpc_endpoint_route_table_association resource.
This commit adds a new resource which allows to a list of route tables to be
either added and/or removed from an existing VPC Endpoint. This resource would
also be complimentary to the existing `aws_vpc_endpoint` resource where the
route tables might not be specified (not a requirement for a VPC Endpoint to
be created successfully) during creation, especially where the workflow is
such where the route tables are not immediately known.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski <krzysztof.wilczynski@linux.com>
Additions by Kit Ewbank <Kit_Ewbank@hotmail.com>:
* Add functionality
* Add documentation
* Add acceptance tests
* Set VPC endpoint route_table_ids attribute to "Computed"
* Changes after review - Set resource ID in create function.
* Changes after code review by @kwilczynski:
* Removed error types and simplified the error handling in 'resourceAwsVPCEndpointRouteTableAssociationRead'
* Simplified logging in 'resourceAwsVPCEndpointRouteTableAssociationDelete'
* provider/aws: Add DeploymentRollback as a valid TriggerEvent type
* provider/aws: Add auto_rollback_configuration to aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Document auto_rollback_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Support removing and disabling auto_rollback_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group resource
- when removing configuration, ensure events are removed
- when disabling configuration, preserve events in case configuration is re-enabled
* provider/aws: Add alarm_configuration to aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Document alarm_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Support removing alarm_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group resource
- disabling configuration doesn't appear to work...
* provider/aws: Refactor auto_rollback_configuration tests
- Add create test
- SKIP failing test for now
- Add tests for build & map functions
* provider/aws: Refactor new aws_code_deploy_deployment_group tests
- alarm_configuration and auto_rollback_configuration only
- add assertions to deployment_group basic test
- rename config funcs to be more easy to read
- group public tests together
* provider/aws: A max of 10 alarms can be added to a deployment group.
- aws_code_deploy_deployment_group.alarm_configuration.alarms
- verified this causes test failure with expected exception
* provider/aws: Test disabling alarm_configuration and auto_rollback_configuration
- the tests now pass after rebasing the latest master branch
* provider/aws: Add ability to create aws_ebs_snapshot
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/10 14:18:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_
-timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_basic (31.56s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_withDescription
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_withDescription (189.35s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws220.928s
```
* docs/aws: Addition of the docs for aws_ebs_snapshot resource
* provider/aws: Creation of shared schema funcs for common AWS data source
patterns
* provider/aws: Create aws_ebs_snapshot datasource
Fixes#8828
This data source will use a number of filters, owner_ids, snapshot_ids
and restorable_by_user_ids in order to find the correct snapshot. The
data source has no real use case for most_recent and will error on no
snapshots found or greater than 1 snapshot found
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/10 14:34:33 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_basic (192.66s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_multipleFilters
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_multipleFilters (33.84s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws226.522s
```
* docs/aws: Addition of docs for the aws_ebs_snapshot data source
Adds the new resource `aws_ebs_snapshot`
When `force_destroy` was specifed on an `aws_iam_user` resource, only IAM
access keys and the login profile were destroyed. If a multi-factor auth
device had been activated for that user, deletion would fail as follows:
```
* aws_iam_user.testuser1: Error deleting IAM User testuser1: DeleteConflict: Cannot delete entity, must delete MFA device first.
status code: 409, request id: aa41b1b7-ac4d-11e6-bb3f-3b4c7a310c65
```
This commit iterates over any of the user's MFA devices and deactivates
them before deleting the user. It follows a pattern similar to that used
to remove users' IAM access keys before deletion.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSUser_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/20 17:09:00 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSUser_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSUser_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSUser_importBasic (5.70s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSUser_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSUser_basic (11.12s)
PASS
ok github.com/rhenning/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 20.840s
```
The docs for the CreateDBInstance API call include quite a bit more information about each individual option, (for example `Engine` has each of the possible options listed, whilst the cli reference doesn't).
* Added key_name_prefix to aws_key_pair resource schema.
* Added logic to prefix the aws_key_pair name on create.
* Added aws_key_pair test config for key_name_prefix case.
* Copied test cases from testAccAWSSecurityGroup namespace.
* Modified copied test case to suit aws_key_pair resource.
* Changed required flag to optional on key_name argument for aws_key_pair resource.
* Added documentation for key_name_prefix argument.
* Code style fix.
* Fixed undefined variable error in test.
fixes#9110
An error was found where, static_routes_only was not set on a vpn
connection import. This commit introduces setting the static_routes_only
to false when no Options are found. This follows the AWS convention as follows:
```
- options (structure)
Indicates whether the VPN connection requires static routes. If you are creating a VPN connection for a device that does not support BGP, you must specify true .
Default: false
```
So we take it that `static_options_only` is false by default
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSVpnConnection_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/02 10:38:18 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSVpnConnection_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSVpnConnection_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVpnConnection_importBasic (178.29s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSVpnConnection_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVpnConnection_basic (336.81s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSVpnConnection_withoutStaticRoutes
--- PASS: TestAccAWSVpnConnection_withoutStaticRoutes (195.45s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 710.572s
```
The documentation mentions ownership of both VPCs for aws_vpc_peering_connection auto_accept to work but if both VPC are in separate accounts it does not matter if both account are owned or not.
In #6843 its stated that aws_vpc_peering_connection only works if both VPC are in the same AWS account.
The documentation fails to mention that peeing of two VPCs in two different regions is not supported by AWS.
Kit Ewbank