Commit Graph

29591 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Laura Pacilio 662301610d
Merge pull request #30264 from minamijoyo/fix-typo-in-doc
docs: Fix typo in docs/plugin-protocol/releasing-new-version.md
2022-01-06 11:13:36 -05:00
Nick Fagerlund 05d0febf7f Relax test to focus on the behavior we care about (encoded == encoded)
The specific output order is meaningless, but it should always be the same after
two Encode() calls with identical (ignoring in-memory order) dependency sets.
2022-01-05 14:38:53 -08:00
Martin Atkins 28a6036cf2 build: Separate Linux distro package builds into separate job
In our build workflow we'll treat Linux distribution packaging (currently
.deb and .rpm packages) as a separate job, instead of embedding it into
the "build" job, so that this step can happen concurrently with the other
derived actions like the docker image build, and the e2etest runs.
2022-01-05 14:31:04 -08:00
Martin Atkins c1699ea80c build: Constrain permissions for the "build" workflow steps
This workflow only generates artifacts and doesn't need to modify anything
about the repository.
2022-01-05 14:31:04 -08:00
Martin Atkins 3bf758eaf5 build: Consolidate build-darwin job into just "build"
We can use an extra matrix dimension to select which execution environment
we'll use for each GOOS/GOARCH pair, and thus avoid duplicating the
job definition for darwin just to set runs-on: macos-latest for it.

This is not really an intended use of a matrix dimension because it's
directly related to the existing "goos" one, rather than being an
independent third dimension, but it doesn't matter in practice because
we're using the "include" option to specify exact combinations, and thus
we're not relying on the built-in functionality to generate all possible
matrix combinations.
2022-01-05 14:31:04 -08:00
Martin Atkins 218e55b23c build: Build docs source package as part of the release pipeline
This should eventually grow to be a step that actually verifies the
validity of the docs source prior to publishing the artifact that a
downstream publishing pipeline can consume, but for the moment it's really
just a placeholder since we have no such validation step and no downstream
pipeline consuming this artifact.

The general idea here is that the artifacts from this workflow should be
sufficient for all downstream release steps to occur without any direct
access to the Terraform CLI repository, and so this is intended to
eventually meet that ideal but as of this commit the website docs
publishing step _does_ still depend on direct access to this repository.
2022-01-05 14:31:04 -08:00
Martin Atkins b802db75d7 build: Build and run e2etest as part of the release build pipeline
This uses the decoupled build and run strategy to run the e2etests so that
we can arrange to run the tests against the real release packages produced
elsewhere in this workflow, rather than ones generated just in time by
the test harness.

The modifications to make-archive.sh here make it more consistent with its
originally-intended purpose of producing a harness for testing "real"
release executables. Our earlier compromise of making it include its own
terraform executable came from a desire to use that script as part of
manual cross-platform testing when we weren't yet set up to support
automation of those tests as we're doing here. That does mean, however,
that the terraform-e2etest package content must be combined with content
from a terraform release package in order to produce a valid contest for
running the tests.

We use a single job to cross-compile the test harness for all of the
supported platforms, because that build is relatively fast and so not
worth the overhead of matrix build, but then use a matrix build to
actually run the tests so that we can run them in a worker matching the
target platform.

We currently have access only to amd64 (x64) runners in GitHub Actions
and so for the moment this process is limited only to the subset of our
supported platforms which use that architecture.
2022-01-05 14:31:04 -08:00
Martin Atkins 6704f8c795 Initial work on a new package build process
For the moment this is just an experimental additional sidecar package
build process, separate from the one we really use for releases, so that
we can get some experience building in the GitHub Actions environment
before hopefully eventually switching to using the artifacts from this
process as the packages we'll release through the official release
channels.

It will react to any push to one of our release branches or to a release
tag by building official-release-like .zip, .deb, and .rpm packages, along
with Docker images, based on the content of the corresponding commit.

For the moment this doesn't actually produce _shippable_ packages because
in particular it doesn't know how to update our version/version.go file
to hard-code the correct version number. Once Go 1.18 is release and we've
upgraded to it we'll switch to using debug.ReadBuildInfo to determine
our version number at runtime and so no longer need to directly update
a source file for each release, but that functionality isn't yet available
in our current Go 1.17 release.
2022-01-05 14:31:04 -08:00
Alisdair McDiarmid df36a03be1 states: Add failing test for ordered dependencies 2022-01-05 14:24:03 -08:00
Alisdair McDiarmid 535da4ebc7
Merge pull request #30205 from hashicorp/alisdair/fix-show-plan-against-non-default-state
command/show: Disable plan state lineage checks
2022-01-05 12:03:28 -05:00
kmoe 73f5c7779f
Merge pull request #30292 from hashicorp/kmoe/dag-basicedge-hashcode
dags: fix BasicEdge pointer issue
2022-01-05 16:49:31 +00:00
Katy Moe f8fdb6de3f
do not use pointer addr strings as map keys in set
When creating a Set of BasicEdges, the Hashcode function is used to determine
map keys for the underlying set data structure.

The string hex representation of the two vertices' pointers is unsafe to use
as a map key, since these addresses may change between the time they are added
to the set and the time the set is operated on.

Instead we modify the Hashcode function to maintain the references to the
underlying vertices so they cannot be garbage collected during the lifetime
of the Set.
2022-01-05 11:28:47 +00:00
Laura Pacilio 8b69d24147 Update remote state data source page 2022-01-04 16:31:52 -05:00
Laura Pacilio 96b31fb1d3 Update core workflow page 2022-01-04 15:43:52 -05:00
Laura Pacilio 5792973dd6 Update language on import command page 2022-01-04 15:22:12 -05:00
Laura Pacilio cab5305191 Fix formatting 2022-01-04 14:58:31 -05:00
Dylan Staley a8bc7a0170
Merge pull request #30237 from hashicorp/ds.submodule-nav-main
Store website nav files (main)
2022-01-04 11:45:49 -08:00
James Bardin 9272ff2c29
Merge pull request #30286 from hashicorp/jbardin/dag
dag: minor cleanup
2022-01-04 12:51:21 -05:00
James Bardin 8bbba22f8c
Merge pull request #30253 from hashicorp/jbardin/move-graph
cleanup some move graph handling
2022-01-04 12:51:12 -05:00
Alisdair McDiarmid ef01d5d134
Merge pull request #30067 from hashicorp/alisdair/redact-sensitive-values-from-function-errors
lang/funcs: Redact sensitive values from function errors
2022-01-04 11:34:04 -05:00
James Bardin 344adb6c50 clarify dag comments
TransitiveReduction does not rely on having a single root, and only
must be free of cycles.

DepthFirstWalk and ReverseDepthFirstWalk do not do a topological sort,
so if order matters TransitiveReduction must be run first.
2022-01-04 10:07:31 -05:00
James Bardin fae68f166f Remove sorted walk functions
These two functions were left during a refactor to ensure the old
behavior of a sorted walk was still accessible in some manner. The
package has since been removed from any public API, and the sorted
versions are no longer called, so we can remove them.
2022-01-04 09:37:53 -05:00
James Bardin f46cf7b8bc cleanup some move graph handling
Create a separate `validateMoveStatementGraph` function so that
`ValidateMoves` and `ApplyMoves` both check the same conditions. Since
we're not using the builtin `graph.Validate` method, because we may have
multiple roots and want better cycle diagnostics, we need to add checks
for self references too. While multiple roots are an error enforced by
`Validate` for the concurrent walk, they are OK when using
`TransitiveReduction` and `ReverseDepthFirstWalk`, so we can skip that
check.

Apply moves must first use `TransitiveReduction` to reduce the graph,
otherwise nodes may be skipped if they are passed over by a transitive
edge.
2022-01-04 09:21:36 -05:00
James Bardin 22dc685052 check for nested module index changes
Changing only the index on a nested module will cause all nested moves
to create cycles, since their full addresses will match both the From
and To addresses. When building the dependency graph, check if the
parent is only changing the index of the containing module, and prevent
the backwards edge for the move.
2022-01-04 09:20:47 -05:00
James Bardin deb82daf2b find implied moves in nested modules
Implied moves in nested modules were being skipped
2022-01-04 09:20:47 -05:00
James Bardin 3d769b7282 IsModuleMoveReIndex
Add a method for checking if the From and To addresses in a move
statement are only changing the indexes of modules relative to the
statement module.

This is needed because move statement nested within the module will be
able to match against both the From and To addresses, causing cycles in
the order of move operations.
2022-01-04 09:20:47 -05:00
Martin Atkins 74761b2f8b getmodules: Use go-getter v1.5.10 and return to upstream GitGetter
There was an unintended regression in go-getter v1.5.9's GitGetter which
caused us to temporarily fork that particular getter into Terraform to
expedite a fix. However, upstream v1.5.10 now includes a
functionally-equivalent fix and so we can heal that fork by upgrading.

We'd also neglected to update the Module Sources docs when upgrading to
go-getter v1.5.9 originally and so we were missing documentation about the
new "depth" argument to enable shadow cloning, which I've added
retroactively here along with documenting its restriction of only
supporting named refs.

This new go-getter release also introduces a new credentials-passing
method for the Google Cloud Storage getter, and so we must incorporate
that into the Terraform-level documentation about module sources.
2022-01-03 11:44:16 -08:00
Mukesh Kumar 27cc49fe91
Update local values definition
The definition of local values used "it" many times, making the sentence not very clear.
2022-01-01 20:35:47 +05:30
Addison Grant 01be55b5c4
Update variables.mdx
Remove extraneous word "from" in "...use a sensitive value from as part of an..."
2021-12-27 10:25:31 -08:00
Masayuki Morita bdf683802d docs: Fix typo in docs/plugin-protocol/releasing-new-version.md 2021-12-27 14:29:02 +09:00
James Bardin 66b4d155b1
Merge pull request #30232 from hashicorp/jbardin/module-move-re-index
Handle move blocks within a module which is changing the index
2021-12-22 16:27:30 -05:00
James Bardin 75ef61c783 check for nested module index changes
Changing only the index on a nested module will cause all nested moves
to create cycles, since their full addresses will match both the From
and To addresses. When building the dependency graph, check if the
parent is only changing the index of the containing module, and prevent
the backwards edge for the move.
2021-12-22 16:15:04 -05:00
Martin Atkins e35c25da44 website: Try function documentation "provably" vs "probably" typo
This paragraph is trying to say that try only works for dynamic errors and
not for errors that are _not_ based on dynamic decision-making in
expressions.

I'm not sure if this typo was always here or if it was mistakenly "corrected"
at some point, but either way the word "probably" changes the meaning
of this sentence entirely, making it seem like Terraform is hedging
the likelihood of a problem rather than checking exactly for one.
2021-12-22 12:10:07 -08:00
Barrett Clark 296acdd961
Merge pull request #30020 from hashicorp/barrettclark/cloud-e2e-parallel
Cloud: Add parallelism back into the tests
2021-12-22 12:14:06 -06:00
Alisdair McDiarmid f772cb085e
Merge pull request #30233 from hashicorp/alisdair/move-nested-modules
refactoring: Move nested modules
2021-12-22 10:22:21 -05:00
Dylan Staley 31ed2d987c store website nav files 2021-12-21 14:52:51 -08:00
Laura Pacilio 138ca02b90 More mentions of remote backend 2021-12-21 17:51:06 -05:00
Laura Pacilio caf0bdbe8d fix push 2021-12-21 17:39:30 -05:00
Laura Pacilio 9022b23d57 Fixing references again 2021-12-21 17:37:35 -05:00
Laura Pacilio 3adcc0158c Add cli integration to command pages 2021-12-21 17:19:05 -05:00
Laura Pacilio f55af42086 Update module sources page 2021-12-21 17:10:29 -05:00
Laura Pacilio 04fb42cb05 Update push CLI command page 2021-12-21 17:05:09 -05:00
James Bardin a72d2d408d
Merge pull request #30095 from hashicorp/jbardin/invalid-provider-name
skip provider resolution when there are errors
2021-12-21 16:58:48 -05:00
James Bardin e761117562 find implied moves in nested modules
Implied moves in nested modules were being skipped
2021-12-21 16:49:25 -05:00
James Bardin 346418e31f IsModuleMoveReIndex
Add a method for checking if the From and To addresses in a move
statement are only changing the indexes of modules relative to the
statement module.

This is needed because move statement nested within the module will be
able to match against both the From and To addresses, causing cycles in
the order of move operations.
2021-12-21 16:49:25 -05:00
Alisdair McDiarmid d7ef123c12 refactoring: Move nested modules
When applying module `moved` statements by iterating through modules in
state, we previously required an exact match from the `moved`
statement's `from` field and the module address. This permitted moving
resources directly inside a module, but did not recur into module calls
within those moved modules.

This commit moves that exact match requirement so that it only applies
to `moved` statements targeting resources. In turn this allows nested
modules to be moved.
2021-12-21 16:25:06 -05:00
Laura Pacilio cd7277128f
Merge pull request #30223 from hashicorp/replace-flag-updates
Update taint command page to make alternative clearer
2021-12-21 10:42:46 -05:00
Nick Fagerlund 9b449bec99 Sort dependencies when encoding `ResourceInstanceObject`
Resource dependencies are by nature an unordered collection, but they're
persisted to state as a JSON array (in random order). This makes a mess for
`terraform apply -refresh-only`, which sees the new random order as a change
that requires the user to approve a state update.

(As an additional problem on top of that, the user interface for refresh-only
runs doesn't expect to see that as a type of change, so it says "no changes!
would you like to update to reflect these detected changes?")

This commit changes `ResourceInstanceObject.Encode()` to sort the in-memory
slice of dependencies (lexically, by address) before passing it on to be
compared and persisted. This appears to fix the observed UI issues with a
minimum of logic changes.
2021-12-20 21:46:39 -08:00
Barrett Clark d196d2870a Refactor cloud table test runs
As the cloud e2e tests evolved some common patters became apparent. This
standardizes and consolidates the patterns into a common test runner
that takes the table tests and runs them in parallel. Some tests also
needed to be converted to utilize table tests.
2021-12-20 16:36:06 -06:00
Laura Pacilio 2a530639f8 Tweaks 2021-12-20 16:01:03 -05:00