Commit Graph

788 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
uturunku1 383da4893b use new enum string for task stages 2022-02-24 14:06:57 -05:00
Brandon Croft aa0dda81b4 Fall back to reading latest run without task_stages
Older versions of TFE will not allow "task_stages" as an include parameter. In this case, fall back to reading the Run without additional options.
2022-02-24 14:06:57 -05:00
uturunku1 a9da859ee5 rename variables to something more descriptive 2022-02-24 14:03:02 -05:00
uturunku1 77946af472 pull latest changes from go-tfe branch and use use new field name that previously was incorrectly named TaskStage 2022-02-24 14:03:00 -05:00
uturunku1 8090b23db7 delete unused function 2022-02-24 14:02:37 -05:00
Brandon Croft 0b8bb29a61 [cloud] refactor integration context and add code documentation 2022-02-24 14:02:37 -05:00
Brandon Croft 791c36c504 [cloud] report run tasks by name instead of assuming pre_apply 2022-02-24 14:02:37 -05:00
uturunku1 6b5da4d43c [cloud] run tasks output formatting 2022-02-24 14:02:37 -05:00
Brandon Croft 2938ec43fa [cloud] handle unreachable run tasks 2022-02-24 14:02:37 -05:00
uturunku1 3e9ae69a12 [cloud] run tasks integration
This change will await the completion of pre-apply run tasks if they
exist on a run and then report the results.

It also adds an abstraction when interacting with cloud integrations such
as policy checking and cost estimation that simplify and unify output,
although I did not go so far as to refactor those callers to use it yet.
2022-02-24 14:02:35 -05:00
Alisdair McDiarmid e21d5d36f4 core: Fix plan write/state write ordering bug 2022-01-26 15:33:18 -05:00
Alisdair McDiarmid 5a9bc76d1a
Merge pull request #30316 from superkooks/main
Fix autocomplete for workspace subcommands
2022-01-21 12:01:41 -05:00
Brian Flad a477d10bd1
Introduce Terraform Plugin Protocol 6.2 with legacy_type_system fields from Protocol 5 (#30375)
Reference: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/30373

This change forward ports the `legacy_type_system` boolean fields in the `ApplyResourceChange.Response` and `PlanResourceChange.Response` messages that existed in protocol version 5, so that existing terraform-plugin-sdk/v2 providers can be muxed with protocol version 6 providers (e.g. terraform-plugin-framework) while also taking advantage of the newer protocol features. This functionality should not be used by any providers or SDKs except those built with terraform-plugin-sdk.

Updated via:

```shell
cp docs/plugin-protocol/tfplugin6.1.proto docs/plugin-protocol/tfplugin6.2.proto
# Copy legacy_type_system fields from tfplugin5.2.proto into ApplyResourceChange.Response and PlanResourceChange
rm internal/tfplugin6/tfplugin6.proto
ln -s ../../docs/plugin-protocol/tfplugin6.2.proto internal/tfplugin6/tfplugin6.proto
go run tools/protobuf-compile/protobuf-compile.go `pwd`
# Updates to internal/plugin6/grpc_provider.go
```
2022-01-20 09:57:42 -05:00
Krista LaFentres (she/her) 6dcf00aefc
Merge pull request #30344 from hashicorp/lafentres/refactor-show-command
cli: Refactor show command & migrate to command arguments and views
2022-01-13 13:58:53 -06:00
Krista LaFentres 64e1241ae3 backend/local: Remove unused DisablePlanFileStateLineageChecks flag
Now that show command has been refactored to remove its dependence
on a local backend and local run, this flag is no longer needed to
fix #30195.
2022-01-13 11:00:10 -06:00
Krista LaFentres fea8f6cfa2 cli: Migrate show command to use command arguments and views 2022-01-13 11:00:03 -06:00
Krista LaFentres 8d1bced812 cli: Refactor show command to remove dependence on local run and only load the backend when we need it
See https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/pull/30205#issuecomment-997113175 for more context
2022-01-12 13:47:59 -06:00
Martin Atkins e95f29bf9d lang/funcs: fileexists slightly better "not a file" error message
Previously we were just returning a string representation of the file mode,
which spends more characters on the irrelevant permission bits that it
does on the directory entry type, and is presented in a Unix-centric
format that likely won't be familiar to the user of a Windows system.

Instead, we'll recognize a few specific directory entry types that seem
worth mentioning by name, and then use a generic message for the rest.

The original motivation here was actually to deal with the fact that our
tests for this function were previously not portable due to the error
message leaking system-specific permission detail that are not relevant
to the test. Rather than just directly addressing that portability
problem, I took the opportunity to improve the error messages at the same
time.

However, because of that initial focus there are only actually tests here
for the directory case. A test that tries to test any of these other file
modes would not be portable and in some cases would require superuser
access, so we'll just leave those cases untested for the moment since they
weren't tested before anyway, and so we've not _lost_ any test coverage
here.
2022-01-11 08:46:29 -08:00
Martin Atkins bdc5f152d7 refactoring: Implied move statements can be cross-package
Terraform uses "implied" move statements to represent the situation where
it automatically handles a switch from count to no-count on a resource.
Because that situation requires targeting only a specific resource
instance inside a specific module instance, implied move statements are
always presented as if they had been declared in the root module and then
traversed through the exact module instance path to reach the target
resource.

However, that means they can potentially cross a module package boundary,
if the changed resource belongs to an external module. Normally we
prohibit that to avoid the root module depending on implementation details
of the called module, but Terraform generates these implied statements
based only on information in the called module and so there's no need to
apply that same restriction to implied move statements, which will always
have source and destination addresses belonging to the same module
instance.

This change therefore fixes a misbehavior where Terraform would reject
an attempt to switch from no-count to count in a called module, where
previously the author of the calling configuration had no recourse to fix
it because the change has actually happened upstream.
2022-01-11 08:43:57 -08:00
James Bardin 684ed7505d remove synthetic default expression for variables
Now that variable evaluation checks for a nil expression the graph
transformer does not need to generate a synthetic expression for
variable defaults. This means that all default handling is now located
in one place, and we are not surprised by a configuration expression
showing up which doesn't actually exist in the configuration.

Rename nodeModuleVariable.evalModuleCallArgument to evalModuleVariable.
This method is no longer handling only the module call argument, it is
also dealing with the variable declaration defaults and validation
statements.

Add an additional tests for validation with a non-nullable variable.
2022-01-10 16:22:33 -05:00
Martin Atkins 9ebc3e1cd2 core: More accurate error message for invalid variable values
In earlier Terraform versions we had an extra validation step prior to
the graph walk which tried to partially validate root module input
variable values (just checking their type constraints) and then return
error messages which specified as accurately as possible where the value
had originally come from.

We're now handling that sort of validation exclusively during the graph
walk so that we can share the main logic between both root module and
child module variable values, but previously that shared code wasn't
able to generate such specific information about where the values had
originated, because it was adapted from code originally written to only
deal with child module variables.

Here then we restore a similar level of detail as before, when we're
processing root module variables. For child module variables, we use
synthetic InputValue objects which state that the value was declared
in the configuration, thus causing us to produce a similar sort of error
message as we would've before which includes a source range covering
the argument expression in the calling module block.
2022-01-10 12:26:54 -08:00
Martin Atkins 36c4d4c241 core and backend: remove redundant handling of default variable values
Previously we had three different layers all thinking they were
responsible for substituting a default value for an unset root module
variable:
 - the local backend, via logic in backend.ParseVariableValues
 - the context.Plan function (and other similar functions) trying to
   preprocess the input variables using
   terraform.mergeDefaultInputVariableValues .
 - the newer prepareFinalInputVariableValue, which aims to centralize all
   of the variable preparation logic so it can be common to both root and
   child module variables.

The second of these was also trying to handle type constraint checking,
which is also the responsibility of the central function and not something
we need to handle so early.

Only the last of these consistently handles both root and child module
variables, and so is the one we ought to keep. The others are now
redundant and are causing prepareFinalInputVariableValue to get a slightly
corrupted view of the caller's chosen variable values.

To rectify that, here we remove the two redundant layers altogether and
have unset root variables pass through as cty.NilVal all the way to the
central prepareFinalInputVariableValue function, which will then handle
them in a suitable way which properly respects the "nullable" setting.

This commit includes some test changes in the terraform package to make
those tests no longer rely on the mergeDefaultInputVariableValues logic
we've removed, and to instead explicitly set cty.NilVal for all unset
variables to comply with our intended contract for PlanOpts.SetVariables,
and similar. (This is so that we can more easily catch bugs in callers
where they _don't_ correctly handle input variables; it allows us to
distinguish between the caller explicitly marking a variable as unset vs.
not describing it at all, where the latter is a bug in the caller.)
2022-01-10 12:26:54 -08:00
Martin Atkins 37b1413ab3 core: Handle root and child module input variables consistently
Previously we had a significant discrepancy between these two situations:
we wrote the raw root module variables directly into the EvalContext and
then applied type conversions only at expression evaluation time, while
for child modules we converted and validated the values while visiting
the variable graph node and wrote only the _final_ value into the
EvalContext.

This confusion seems to have been the root cause for #29899, where
validation rules for root module variables were being applied at the wrong
point in the process, prior to type conversion.

To fix that bug and also make similar mistakes less likely in the future,
I've made the root module variable handling more like the child module
variable handling in the following ways:
 - The "raw value" (exactly as given by the user) lives only in the graph
   node representing the variable, which mirrors how the _expression_
   for a child module variable lives in its graph node. This means that
   the flow for the two is the same except that there's no expression
   evaluation step for root module variables, because they arrive as
   constant values from the caller.
 - The set of variable values in the EvalContext is always only "final"
   values, after type conversion is complete. That in turn means we no
   longer need to do "just in time" conversion in
   evaluationStateData.GetInputVariable, and can just return the value
   exactly as stored, which is consistent with how we handle all other
   references between objects.

This diff is noisier than I'd like because of how much it takes to wire
a new argument (the raw variable values) through to the plan graph builder,
but those changes are pretty mechanical and the interesting logic lives
inside the plan graph builder itself, in NodeRootVariable, and
the shared helper functions in eval_variable.go.

While here I also took the opportunity to fix a historical API wart in
EvalContext, where SetModuleCallArguments was built to take a set of
variable values all at once but our current caller always calls with only
one at a time. That is now just SetModuleCallArgument singular, to match
with the new SetRootModuleArgument to deal with root module variables.
2022-01-10 12:26:54 -08:00
Martin Atkins 483c38aca1 core: Remove TestContext2Validate_PlanGraphBuilder
This test seems to be a holdover from the many-moons-ago switch from one
graph for all operations to separate graphs for plan and apply. It is
effectively just a copy of a subset of the content of the Context.Validate
function and is a maintainability hazard because it tends to lag behind
updates to that function unless changes there happen to make it fail.

This test doesn't cover anything that the other validate context tests
don't exercise as an implementation detail of calling Context.Validate,
so I've just removed it with no replacement.
2022-01-10 12:26:54 -08:00
Martin Atkins 171e7ef6d9 core: Invalid for_each argument messaging improvements
Our original messaging here was largely just lifted from the equivalent
message for unknown values in "count", and it didn't really include any
specific advice on how to update a configuration to make for_each valid,
instead focusing only on the workaround of using the -target planning
option.

It's tough to pack in a fully-actionable suggestion here since unknown
values in for_each keys tends to be a gnarly architectural problem rather
than a local quirk -- when data flows between modules it can sometimes be
unclear whether it'll end up being used in a context which allows unknown
values.

I did my best to summarize the advice we've been giving in community forum
though, in the hope that more people will be able to address this for
themselves without asking for help, until we're one day able to smooth
this out better with a mechanism such as "partial apply".
2022-01-10 12:23:13 -08:00
SuperKooks 5171c89e1e Fix autocomplete for workspace subcommands 2022-01-08 14:41:20 +11:00
Nick Fagerlund 1e9075b4fa
Merge pull request #30226 from hashicorp/nf/dec21-derandomize-dependencies
Sort dependencies when encoding `ResourceInstanceObject`
2022-01-07 15:26:07 -08:00
Nick Fagerlund 05d0febf7f Relax test to focus on the behavior we care about (encoded == encoded)
The specific output order is meaningless, but it should always be the same after
two Encode() calls with identical (ignoring in-memory order) dependency sets.
2022-01-05 14:38:53 -08:00
Martin Atkins b802db75d7 build: Build and run e2etest as part of the release build pipeline
This uses the decoupled build and run strategy to run the e2etests so that
we can arrange to run the tests against the real release packages produced
elsewhere in this workflow, rather than ones generated just in time by
the test harness.

The modifications to make-archive.sh here make it more consistent with its
originally-intended purpose of producing a harness for testing "real"
release executables. Our earlier compromise of making it include its own
terraform executable came from a desire to use that script as part of
manual cross-platform testing when we weren't yet set up to support
automation of those tests as we're doing here. That does mean, however,
that the terraform-e2etest package content must be combined with content
from a terraform release package in order to produce a valid contest for
running the tests.

We use a single job to cross-compile the test harness for all of the
supported platforms, because that build is relatively fast and so not
worth the overhead of matrix build, but then use a matrix build to
actually run the tests so that we can run them in a worker matching the
target platform.

We currently have access only to amd64 (x64) runners in GitHub Actions
and so for the moment this process is limited only to the subset of our
supported platforms which use that architecture.
2022-01-05 14:31:04 -08:00
Alisdair McDiarmid df36a03be1 states: Add failing test for ordered dependencies 2022-01-05 14:24:03 -08:00
Alisdair McDiarmid 535da4ebc7
Merge pull request #30205 from hashicorp/alisdair/fix-show-plan-against-non-default-state
command/show: Disable plan state lineage checks
2022-01-05 12:03:28 -05:00
Katy Moe f8fdb6de3f
do not use pointer addr strings as map keys in set
When creating a Set of BasicEdges, the Hashcode function is used to determine
map keys for the underlying set data structure.

The string hex representation of the two vertices' pointers is unsafe to use
as a map key, since these addresses may change between the time they are added
to the set and the time the set is operated on.

Instead we modify the Hashcode function to maintain the references to the
underlying vertices so they cannot be garbage collected during the lifetime
of the Set.
2022-01-05 11:28:47 +00:00
James Bardin 9272ff2c29
Merge pull request #30286 from hashicorp/jbardin/dag
dag: minor cleanup
2022-01-04 12:51:21 -05:00
James Bardin 8bbba22f8c
Merge pull request #30253 from hashicorp/jbardin/move-graph
cleanup some move graph handling
2022-01-04 12:51:12 -05:00
Alisdair McDiarmid ef01d5d134
Merge pull request #30067 from hashicorp/alisdair/redact-sensitive-values-from-function-errors
lang/funcs: Redact sensitive values from function errors
2022-01-04 11:34:04 -05:00
James Bardin 344adb6c50 clarify dag comments
TransitiveReduction does not rely on having a single root, and only
must be free of cycles.

DepthFirstWalk and ReverseDepthFirstWalk do not do a topological sort,
so if order matters TransitiveReduction must be run first.
2022-01-04 10:07:31 -05:00
James Bardin fae68f166f Remove sorted walk functions
These two functions were left during a refactor to ensure the old
behavior of a sorted walk was still accessible in some manner. The
package has since been removed from any public API, and the sorted
versions are no longer called, so we can remove them.
2022-01-04 09:37:53 -05:00
James Bardin f46cf7b8bc cleanup some move graph handling
Create a separate `validateMoveStatementGraph` function so that
`ValidateMoves` and `ApplyMoves` both check the same conditions. Since
we're not using the builtin `graph.Validate` method, because we may have
multiple roots and want better cycle diagnostics, we need to add checks
for self references too. While multiple roots are an error enforced by
`Validate` for the concurrent walk, they are OK when using
`TransitiveReduction` and `ReverseDepthFirstWalk`, so we can skip that
check.

Apply moves must first use `TransitiveReduction` to reduce the graph,
otherwise nodes may be skipped if they are passed over by a transitive
edge.
2022-01-04 09:21:36 -05:00
James Bardin 22dc685052 check for nested module index changes
Changing only the index on a nested module will cause all nested moves
to create cycles, since their full addresses will match both the From
and To addresses. When building the dependency graph, check if the
parent is only changing the index of the containing module, and prevent
the backwards edge for the move.
2022-01-04 09:20:47 -05:00
James Bardin deb82daf2b find implied moves in nested modules
Implied moves in nested modules were being skipped
2022-01-04 09:20:47 -05:00
James Bardin 3d769b7282 IsModuleMoveReIndex
Add a method for checking if the From and To addresses in a move
statement are only changing the indexes of modules relative to the
statement module.

This is needed because move statement nested within the module will be
able to match against both the From and To addresses, causing cycles in
the order of move operations.
2022-01-04 09:20:47 -05:00
Martin Atkins 74761b2f8b getmodules: Use go-getter v1.5.10 and return to upstream GitGetter
There was an unintended regression in go-getter v1.5.9's GitGetter which
caused us to temporarily fork that particular getter into Terraform to
expedite a fix. However, upstream v1.5.10 now includes a
functionally-equivalent fix and so we can heal that fork by upgrading.

We'd also neglected to update the Module Sources docs when upgrading to
go-getter v1.5.9 originally and so we were missing documentation about the
new "depth" argument to enable shadow cloning, which I've added
retroactively here along with documenting its restriction of only
supporting named refs.

This new go-getter release also introduces a new credentials-passing
method for the Google Cloud Storage getter, and so we must incorporate
that into the Terraform-level documentation about module sources.
2022-01-03 11:44:16 -08:00
James Bardin 66b4d155b1
Merge pull request #30232 from hashicorp/jbardin/module-move-re-index
Handle move blocks within a module which is changing the index
2021-12-22 16:27:30 -05:00
James Bardin 75ef61c783 check for nested module index changes
Changing only the index on a nested module will cause all nested moves
to create cycles, since their full addresses will match both the From
and To addresses. When building the dependency graph, check if the
parent is only changing the index of the containing module, and prevent
the backwards edge for the move.
2021-12-22 16:15:04 -05:00
Barrett Clark 296acdd961
Merge pull request #30020 from hashicorp/barrettclark/cloud-e2e-parallel
Cloud: Add parallelism back into the tests
2021-12-22 12:14:06 -06:00
Alisdair McDiarmid f772cb085e
Merge pull request #30233 from hashicorp/alisdair/move-nested-modules
refactoring: Move nested modules
2021-12-22 10:22:21 -05:00
James Bardin a72d2d408d
Merge pull request #30095 from hashicorp/jbardin/invalid-provider-name
skip provider resolution when there are errors
2021-12-21 16:58:48 -05:00
James Bardin e761117562 find implied moves in nested modules
Implied moves in nested modules were being skipped
2021-12-21 16:49:25 -05:00
James Bardin 346418e31f IsModuleMoveReIndex
Add a method for checking if the From and To addresses in a move
statement are only changing the indexes of modules relative to the
statement module.

This is needed because move statement nested within the module will be
able to match against both the From and To addresses, causing cycles in
the order of move operations.
2021-12-21 16:49:25 -05:00
Alisdair McDiarmid d7ef123c12 refactoring: Move nested modules
When applying module `moved` statements by iterating through modules in
state, we previously required an exact match from the `moved`
statement's `from` field and the module address. This permitted moving
resources directly inside a module, but did not recur into module calls
within those moved modules.

This commit moves that exact match requirement so that it only applies
to `moved` statements targeting resources. In turn this allows nested
modules to be moved.
2021-12-21 16:25:06 -05:00