It turns out that a few use cases depend on not finding a resource
without an error.
The other code paths had sufficient nil checks for this, but there was
one place where we called Count() that needed to be checked. If the
existence of the resource matters, it would be caught at a higher level
and still return an "unknown resource" error to the user.
For historical reasons, sets are represented as sparse lists in a
flatmap, however a computed set does not have a numeric index.
Strip the `~` flag from a computed set's index during expansion, and add
it back in the prefix after sorting.
not found
Fixes: #12279
When manually deleting an autoscaling_group from the console, a
terraform plan would look as follows:
```
% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_launch_configuration.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test-0096cf26c7eebdc9fcb5bd1837)
aws_autoscaling_group.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test)
aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Error retrieving Autoscaling Scheduled Actions: ValidationError: Group test not found
status code: 400, request id: 093e9ed5-fe01-11e6-b990-1f64334b3a10
```
After this patch:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_launch_configuration.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test-0096cf26c7eebdc9fcb5bd1837)
aws_autoscaling_group.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test)
aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_autoscaling_group.foobar
arn: "<computed>"
availability_zones.#: "1"
availability_zones.2487133097: "us-west-2a"
default_cooldown: "<computed>"
desired_capacity: "<computed>"
force_delete: "true"
health_check_grace_period: "300"
health_check_type: "ELB"
launch_configuration: "test-0096cf26c7eebdc9fcb5bd1837"
load_balancers.#: "<computed>"
max_size: "1"
metrics_granularity: "1Minute"
min_size: "1"
name: "test"
protect_from_scale_in: "false"
tag.#: "1"
tag.157008572.key: "Foo"
tag.157008572.propagate_at_launch: "true"
tag.157008572.value: "foo-bar"
termination_policies.#: "1"
termination_policies.0: "OldestInstance"
vpc_zone_identifier.#: "<computed>"
wait_for_capacity_timeout: "10m"
+ aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar
arn: "<computed>"
autoscaling_group_name: "test"
desired_capacity: "0"
end_time: "2017-12-12T06:00:00Z"
max_size: "1"
min_size: "0"
recurrence: "<computed>"
scheduled_action_name: "foobar"
start_time: "2017-12-11T18:00:00Z"
Plan: 2 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
Add Env and SetEnv methods to command.Meta to retrieve the current
environment name inside any command.
Make sure all calls to Backend.State contain an environment name, and
make the package compile against the update backend package.
What will hopfully be the final version of the Backend interface. This
combines the MultiState interface into Backend since it will be required
to implement, and simplifies the interface because the Backend is no
longer responsible for tracking the current state.
Destroying a terraform state can't always create an empty state, as
outputs and the root module may remain. Use HasResources to warn about
deleting an environment with resources.
Forgot to remove the currentState field, which was not always set. The
current state should always just be read from the environment file.
Always return the default state name when we can't determine the state.
In order to operate in parity with other commands, the env command
should take a path argument to locate the configuration.
This however introduces the issue of a possible name conflict between a
path and subcommand, or printing an incorrect current environment for
the bare `env` command. In favor of simplicity this removes the current
env output and only prints usage when no subcommand is provided.
Split the interface to change environments out from the minimal Backend
interface, to make it optional for backend implementations. If
backend.MultiState isn't implemented, return a "not implemented" from
environment related methods.
Have the Local backend delegate the MultiState methods to the proper
backend.
I made this interface way back with the original backend work and I
guess I forgot to hook it up! This is becoming an issue as I'm working
on our 2nd enhanced backend that requires this information and I
realized it was hardcoded before.
This propertly uses the CLIInit interface allowing any backend to gain
access to this data.
* provider/openstack: Rename provider to loadbalancer_provider
This commit renames provider to loadbalancer_provider in the
openstack_lb_loadbalancer_v2 resource.
It also changes security_group_ids to Computed so default
security groups are added to the state correctly.
* provider/openstack: Switch to a deprecation path for loadbalancer provider
This commit switches to using a deprecation path for removal of the
previous "provider" argument in favor of the new "loadbalancer_provider".
This commit removes the bundled devstack script and updates the
documentation to point to the latest build scripts used for
testing. It also mentions that development should be possible on
any OpenStack environment.
James Bardin