* provider/google: Fix server/state diff with disk_autoresize
* provider/google: Default true for disk.auto_resize
For sql_database_instance , to match the new API default.
Also adds diff suppression func for autoresize on 1st gen instances
* fix typos
Fixes: #14535
When in a `restricted` cloud, we should fall back to the old method of
tagging. Before this change we saw the following:
```
% terraform apply ✭
aws_instance.foo: Creating...
ami: "" => "ami-0fa3c42c"
associate_public_ip_address: "" => "<computed>"
availability_zone: "" => "<computed>"
ebs_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
ephemeral_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
instance_state: "" => "<computed>"
instance_type: "" => "m1.small"
ipv6_address_count: "" => "<computed>"
ipv6_addresses.#: "" => "<computed>"
key_name: "" => "<computed>"
network_interface.#: "" => "<computed>"
network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>"
placement_group: "" => "<computed>"
primary_network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>"
private_dns: "" => "<computed>"
private_ip: "" => "<computed>"
public_dns: "" => "<computed>"
public_ip: "" => "<computed>"
root_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
security_groups.#: "" => "<computed>"
source_dest_check: "" => "true"
subnet_id: "" => "<computed>"
tags.%: "" => "1"
tags.foo: "" => "bar"
tenancy: "" => "<computed>"
volume_tags.%: "" => "<computed>"
vpc_security_group_ids.#: "" => "<computed>"
aws_instance.foo: Creation complete (ID: i-0009f227ae24791b9)
Apply complete! Resources: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 destroyed.
% terraform plan ✭
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_instance.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: i-0009f227ae24791b9)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
~ aws_instance.foo
tags.%: "0" => "1"
tags.foo: "" => "bar"
Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
After this patch, we see the following:
```
% terraform apply ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
aws_instance.foo: Creating...
ami: "" => "ami-0fa3c42c"
associate_public_ip_address: "" => "<computed>"
availability_zone: "" => "<computed>"
ebs_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
ephemeral_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
instance_state: "" => "<computed>"
instance_type: "" => "m1.small"
ipv6_address_count: "" => "<computed>"
ipv6_addresses.#: "" => "<computed>"
key_name: "" => "<computed>"
network_interface.#: "" => "<computed>"
network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>"
placement_group: "" => "<computed>"
primary_network_interface_id: "" => "<computed>"
private_dns: "" => "<computed>"
private_ip: "" => "<computed>"
public_dns: "" => "<computed>"
public_ip: "" => "<computed>"
root_block_device.#: "" => "<computed>"
security_groups.#: "" => "<computed>"
source_dest_check: "" => "true"
subnet_id: "" => "<computed>"
tags.%: "" => "1"
tags.foo: "" => "bar"
tenancy: "" => "<computed>"
volume_tags.%: "" => "<computed>"
vpc_security_group_ids.#: "" => "<computed>"
aws_instance.foo: Creation complete (ID: i-04cd122e28f167a14)
Apply complete! Resources: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 destroyed.
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_instance.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: i-04cd122e28f167a14)
No changes. Infrastructure is up-to-date.
This means that Terraform did not detect any differences between your
configuration and real physical resources that exist. As a result, Terraform
doesn't need to do anything.
```
Fixes: #14530
When we found an update of IPv6 cidr block, we first tried to
disassociate the old cidr block association. This caused errors if there
was none, it threw an error, as we passed an empty associationId:
```
* aws_subnet.public_subnet.0: InvalidSubnetCidrBlockAssociationId.Malformed: The subnet CIDR block with association ID is malformed
status code: 400, request id: f438f468-9ca4-4000-ba78-63a0f25d390a
* aws_subnet.public_subnet[1]: 1 error(s) occurred:
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSubnet_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/05/16 18:28:45 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSSubnet_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSubnet_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSubnet_importBasic (55.40s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSubnet_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSubnet_basic (53.62s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSubnet_ipv6
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSubnet_ipv6 (125.87s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSSubnet_enableIpv6
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSubnet_enableIpv6 (88.88s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 323.787s
```
* core/providersplit: Split OPC Provider to separate repo
As we march towards Terraform 0.10.0, we are going to start building the
terraform providers as separate binaries - this will allow us to
continually release them. Before we go to 0.10.0, we need to be able to
continue building providers in the same manner, therefore, we have
hardcoded the path of the provider in the generate-plugins.go file
The interim solution will require us to vendor the opc provider and any
child dependencies, but when we get to 0.10.0, we will no longer have to
do this - the core will auto download the plugin binary. The plugin
package will have it's own dependencies vendored as well.
* core/providersplit: Removing the builtin version of OPC provider
* core/providersplit: Vendoring the OPC plugin
* core/providersplit: update internal plugin list
* core/providersplit: remove unused govendor item
Fixes: #14361
An IPv6 CIDR block is option and can be added *after* a subnet has been
created. Therefore, we should set it to `Computed: true`
Otherwise, a manually created IPv6 association will be removed on the
next terraform run
Correctly sets the attribute `ip_address` in the `opc_compute_ip_address_reservation` resource.
Also updates documentation for the `ip_address_pool` attribute.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/opc TESTARGS="-run=TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic"
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/05/16 10:15:53 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/opc -v -run=TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic
--- PASS: TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic (22.60s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/opc 22.604s
```
This changeset fixes how some digitalocean dns records were getting
parsed. In particular, it allows for understanding "@" as shorthand for
the domain itself, preventing terraform from suggesting changes that
wouldn't have any actual effect. This changeset also adds a trailing "."
to certain record types which are required to be submitted with a
trailing dot, but which digitalocean does not return with a trailing
dot, again preventing changes that wouldn't have an effect.
Tests have been added for the above, and with just adding the tests, the
current code is failing, as it is handling some records(e.g. MX)
incorrectly
* Propagate AWS CodePipeline action roles
* Add acceptance test for AWS CodePipeline action roles
* Isolate AWS CodePipeline service role acceptance test
Radek Simko