terraform/builtin/providers
Christopher Tiwald 89bacc0b15 aws: error on expndIPPerms(...) if our ports and protocol conflict.
Ingress and egress rules given a "-1" protocol don't have ports when
Read out of AWS. This results in hashing problems, as a local
config file might contain port declarations AWS can't ever return.

Rather than making ports optional fields, which carries with it a huge
headache trying to distinguish between zero-value attributes (e.g.
'to_port = 0') and attributes that are simply omitted, simply force the
user to opt-in when using the "-1" protocol. If they choose to use it,
they must now specify "0" for both to_port and from_port. Any other
configuration will error.
2015-05-04 23:43:31 -04:00
..
atlas
aws aws: error on expndIPPerms(...) if our ports and protocol conflict. 2015-05-04 23:43:31 -04:00
cloudflare providers/cloudflare: Better error message 2015-04-29 13:49:16 -07:00
cloudstack Merge pull request #1711 from jeroendekorte/b-cloudstack-aclrule 2015-04-28 18:39:21 +02:00
consul
digitalocean providers/digitalocean: fix ssh key test 2015-04-02 09:04:59 -05:00
dme
dnsimple providers/dnsimple: default ttl to 3600 2015-04-28 09:20:23 -04:00
docker provider/docker: fmt on container resource 2015-04-20 14:18:46 -05:00
google Use a set for service account scopes. Fix #1759 2015-04-30 21:21:21 -04:00
heroku
mailgun
null
openstack Merge pull request #1745 from hashicorp/b-openstack-bool 2015-04-30 14:27:14 -07:00
terraform providers/terraform: name it terraform_remote_state 2015-04-01 22:49:05 -07:00