If sensitivity changes, we have an update plan,
but should avoid communicating with the provider
on the apply, as the values are equal (and otherwise
a NoOp plan)
* remove unused code
I've removed the provider-specific code under registry, and unused nil
backend, and replaced a call to helper from backend/oss (the other
callers of that func are provisioners scheduled to be deprecated).
I also removed the Dockerfile, as our build process uses a different
file.
Finally I removed the examples directory, which had outdated examples
and links. There are better, actively maintained examples available.
* command: remove various unused bits
* test wasn't running
* backend: remove unused err
When the sensitivity has changed, we want to write to
state and also display to the user that the sensitivity
has changed, so make this an update action. Also
clean up some assignments, since Contains traverses the val
anyway, this is a little tighter.
If an entire block is marked sensitive (possibly because it is of type
NestedSet) and results in replacement of the resource, we should render
the standard "forces replacement" text after the opening line of the
block.
Auditing the graph builder to remove unused transformers (planning does
not need to close provisioners for example), and re-order them. While
many of the transformations are commutative, using the same order
ensures the same behavior between operations when the commutative
property is lost or changed.
Outputs were not being evaluated during import, because it was not added
to the walk filter.
Remove any unnecessary walk filters from all the Execute nodes.
If a value rendered for the diff is sensitive and results in replacement
of the resource, we should render the standard "forces replacement" text
after the "(sensitive)" value display.
We do not currently need to evaluate module variables in order to
import a resource.
This will likely change once we can select the import provider
automatically, and have a more dynamic method for dispatching providers
to module instances. In the meantime we can avoid the evaluation for now
and prevent a certain class of import errors.
The change was passed into the provisioner node because the normal
NodeApplyableResourceInstance overwrites the prior state with the new
state. This however doesn't matter here, because the resource destroy
node does not do this. Also, even if the updated state were to be used
for some reason with a create provisioner, it would be the correct state
to use at that point.
Fix for issue #26320 - this allows us to derive known values from
partially known maps where we can, and may prevent unnecessary
destroy/rebuild cycles during apply in some cases.
Pam Selle