existing example returns an error like the following should you try to
run `terraform plan` against it:
Error reading config for aws_subnet[example]: data.aws_availability_zone.name_suffix: data variables must be four parts: data.TYPE.NAME.ATTR in:
${cidrsubnet(aws_vpc.example.cidr_block, 4, var.az_number[data.aws_availability_zone.name_suffix])}
Needed due to work done in 95d37ea, we may need to adjust
hasComputedSubKeys to propagate NewComputed in the same way that we
have added "~", however will wait for comment from @mitchellh.
This covers:
* Complex sets with computed fields in a set
* Complex lists with computed fields in a set
Adding a test to test basic lists with computed fields seemed to fail,
but possibly for an unrelated reason (the list returned as nil). The fix
to this inparticular case may be out of the scope of this specific
issue.
Reference gist and details in hashicorp/terraform#9171.
This fixes some edge-ish cases where a set in a config has a set or list
in it that contains computed values, but non-set or list values in the
parent do not.
This can cause "diffs didn't match during apply" errors in a scenario
such as when a set's hash is calculated off of child items (including
any sub-lists or sets, as it should be), and the hash changes between
the plan and apply diffs due to the computed values present in the
sub-list or set items. These will be marked as computed, but due to the
fact that the function was not iterating over the list or set items
properly (ie: not adding the item number to the address, so
set.0.set.foo was being yielded instead of set.0.set.0.foo), these
computed values were not being properly propagated to the parent set to
be marked as computed.
Fixeshashicorp/terraform#6527.
Fixeshashicorp/terraform#8271.
This possibly fixes other non-CloudFront related issues too.
Fixes a case where ResourceConfig.get inadvertently returns a nil value.
Add an integration test where assigning a map to a list via
interpolation would panic.
We allow variables to have descriptions specified, as additional context
for a module user as to what should be provided for a given variable.
We previously lacked a similar mechanism for outputs. Since they too are
part of a module's public interface, it makes sense to be able to add
descriptions for these for symmetry's sake.
This change makes a "description" attribute valid within an "output"
configuration block and stores it within the configuration data structure,
but doesn't yet do anything further with it. For now this is useful only
for third-party tools that might parse a module's config to generate
user documentation; later we could expose the descriptions as part of
the "apply" output, but that is left for a separate change.
Also fixed tests failing auth caused by getStorageAccountAccessKey returning the
key name rather than the value
TF_ACC= go test ./state/remote -v -run=TestAz -timeout=10m -parallel=4
=== RUN TestAzureClient_impl
--- PASS: TestAzureClient_impl (0.00s)
=== RUN TestAzureClient
2016/11/18 13:57:34 [DEBUG] New state was assigned lineage "96037426-f95e-45c3-9183-6c39b49f590b"
2016/11/18 13:57:34 [TRACE] Preserving existing state lineage "96037426-f95e-45c3-9183-6c39b49f590b"
--- PASS: TestAzureClient (130.60s)
=== RUN TestAzureClientEmptyLease
2016/11/18 13:59:44 [DEBUG] New state was assigned lineage "d9997445-1ebf-4b2c-b4df-15ae152f6417"
2016/11/18 13:59:44 [TRACE] Preserving existing state lineage "d9997445-1ebf-4b2c-b4df-15ae152f6417"
--- PASS: TestAzureClientEmptyLease (128.15s)
=== RUN TestAzureClientLease
2016/11/18 14:01:55 [DEBUG] New state was assigned lineage "85912a12-2e0e-464c-9886-8add39ea3a87"
2016/11/18 14:01:55 [TRACE] Preserving existing state lineage "85912a12-2e0e-464c-9886-8add39ea3a87"
--- PASS: TestAzureClientLease (138.09s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/state/remote 397.111s
* provider/github: add GitHub labels resource
Provides a GitHub issue label resource.
This resource allows easy management of issue labels for an
organisation's repositories. A name, and a color can be set.
These attributes can be updated without creating a new resource.
* provider/github: add documentation for GitHub issue labels resource
* provider/aws: Add aws_alb_listener data source
This adds the aws_alb_listener data source to get information on an AWS
Application Load Balancer listener.
The schema is slightly modified (only option-wise, attributes are the
same) and we use the aws_alb_listener resource read function to get the
data.
Note that the HTTPS test here may fail due until
hashicorp/terraform#10180 is merged.
* provider/aws: Add aws_alb_listener data source docs
Now documented.
When using the static NAT resource, you no longer have to specify a `network_id`. This can be inferred from the choosen `virtual_machine_id` and/or the `vm_guest_ip`.
This is necessary since the TypeUnknown HIL handling in helper/schema
makes providers compiled WITHOUT TypeUnknown incompatible with the way
core handles unknown values.
Setting variables happens before context validation, so it's possible
that the user could be trying to set an incorrect variable type to a
map. Return a useful error rather than panicking.
* provider/scaleway: increase wait for server time
according to the scaleway community, shutdown/ startup might actually take an
hour. since a regular shutdown transfers data this is bound by the size of the
actual volumes in use.
https://community.online.net/t/solving-the-long-shutdown-boot-when-only-needed-to-attach-detach-a-volume/326
anyhow, 20 minutes seems quite optimistic, and we've seen some timeout errors in
the logs, too
* provider/scaleway: clear cache on volume attachment
the volume attachment errors quite often, and while I have no hard evidence
(yet) I guess it might be related to the cache that the official scaleway SDK
includes.
for now this is just a tiny experiment, clearing the cache when creating/
destroying volume attachments. let's see if this improves anything, really
* provider/scaleway: guard against attaching already attached volumes
* provider/scaleway: use cheaper instance types for tests
Scaleway bills by the hour and C2S costs much more than C1, since in the tests
we just spin up instances, to destroy them later on...
Looks like sometimes it takes some time for IAM certificates to
propagate, which can cause errors on ALB listener creation.
Possibly same thing as hashicorp/terraform#5178, but for ALB
now instead of ELB.
This was discovered via acceptance tests, specifically the
TestAccAWSALBListener_https test. Updated the creation process to wait
on CertificateNotFound for a max of 5min.
Ryan Eschinger