This brings over the work done by @apparentlymart and @radeksimko in
PR #3124, and converts it into a data source for the AWS provider:
This commit adds a helper to construct IAM policy documents using
familiar Terraform concepts. It makes Terraform-style interpolations
easier and resolves the syntax conflict between Terraform interpolations
and IAM policy variables by changing the latter to use &{...} for its
interpolations.
Its use is completely optional and users are free to go on using literal
heredocs, file interpolations or whatever else; this just adds another
option that fits more naturally into a Terraform config.
This data source allows one to look up the most recent AMI for a specific
set of parameters, much like aws ec2 describe-images in the AWS CLI.
Basically a refresh of hashicorp/terraform#4396, in data source form.
* Add per user, role and group policy attachment
* Add docs for new IAM policy attachment resources.
* Make policy attachment resources manage only 1 entity<->policy attachment
* provider/aws: Tidy up IAM Group/User/Role attachments
This commit adds a data source with a single list, `instance` for the
schema which gets populated with the availability zones to which an
account has access.
* Grafana provider
* grafana_data_source resource.
Allows data sources to be created in Grafana. Supports all data source
types that are accepted in the current version of Grafana, and will
support any future ones that fit into the existing structure.
* Vendoring of apparentlymart/go-grafana-api
This is in anticipation of adding a Grafana provider plugin.
* grafana_dashboard resource
* Website documentation for the Grafana provider.
As a first example of a real-world data source, the pre-existing
terraform_remote_state resource is adapted to be a data source. The
original resource is shimmed to wrap the data source for backward
compatibility.
This introduces the terraform state list command to list the resources
within a state. This is the first of many state management commands to
come into 0.7.
This is the first command of many to come that is considered a
"plumbing" command within Terraform (see "plumbing vs porcelain":
http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/what-are-plumbing-and-porcelain-td2190639.html).
As such, this PR also introduces a bunch of groundwork to support
plumbing commands.
The main changes:
- Main command output is changed to split "common" and "uncommon"
commands.
- mitchellh/cli is updated to support nested subcommands, since
terraform state list is a nested subcommand.
- terraform.StateFilter is introduced as a way in core to filter/search
the state files. This is very basic currently but I expect to make it
more advanced as time goes on.
- terraform state list command is introduced to list resources in a
state. This can take a series of arguments to filter this down.
Known issues, or things that aren't done in this PR on purpose:
- Unit tests for terraform state list are on the way. Unit tests for the
core changes are all there.
* New top level AWS resource aws_eip_association
* Add documentation for aws_eip_association
* Add tests for aws_eip_association
* provider/aws: Change `aws_elastic_ip_association` to have computed
parameters
The AWS API was send ing more parameters than we had set. Therefore,
Terraform was showing constant changes when plans were being formed
Change the AWS DB Instance to now include the DB Option Group param. Adds a test to prove that it works
Add acceptance tests for the AWS DB Option Group work. This ensures that Options can be added and updated
Documentation for the AWS DB Option resource
Here is an example that will setup the following:
+ An SSH key resource.
+ A virtual server resource that uses an existing SSH key.
+ A virtual server resource using an existing SSH key and a Terraform managed SSH key (created as "test_key_1" in the example below).
(create this as sl.tf and run terraform commands from this directory):
```hcl
provider "softlayer" {
username = ""
api_key = ""
}
resource "softlayer_ssh_key" "test_key_1" {
name = "test_key_1"
public_key = "${file(\"~/.ssh/id_rsa_test_key_1.pub\")}"
# Windows Example:
# public_key = "${file(\"C:\ssh\keys\path\id_rsa_test_key_1.pub\")}"
}
resource "softlayer_virtual_guest" "my_server_1" {
name = "my_server_1"
domain = "example.com"
ssh_keys = ["123456"]
image = "DEBIAN_7_64"
region = "ams01"
public_network_speed = 10
cpu = 1
ram = 1024
}
resource "softlayer_virtual_guest" "my_server_2" {
name = "my_server_2"
domain = "example.com"
ssh_keys = ["123456", "${softlayer_ssh_key.test_key_1.id}"]
image = "CENTOS_6_64"
region = "ams01"
public_network_speed = 10
cpu = 1
ram = 1024
}
```
You'll need to provide your SoftLayer username and API key,
so that Terraform can connect. If you don't want to put
credentials in your configuration file, you can leave them
out:
```
provider "softlayer" {}
```
...and instead set these environment variables:
- **SOFTLAYER_USERNAME**: Your SoftLayer username
- **SOFTLAYER_API_KEY**: Your API key
this implements two new resource types:
* openstack_networking_secgroup_v2 - create a neutron security group
* openstack_networking_secgroup_rule_v2 - create a newutron security
group rule
Unlike their nova counterparts the neutron security groups allow a user
to specify the target tenant_id allowing a cloud admin to create per
tenant resources.
Keshav Varma