We can remove the caveat about changing map elements.
Add a little more text about the intended use case for ignore_changes,
as the common case of fixing erroneous provider behavior should not be
the primary motivation for the maintenance of this feature.
There are situations when a user may want to keep or exclude a map key
using `ignore_changes` which may not be listed directly in the
configuration. This didn't work previously because the transformation
always started off with the configuration, and would never encounter a
key if it was only present in the prior value.
* Split node_resource_abstract.go into two files, putting
NodeAbstractResourceInstance methods in their own file - it was getting
large enough to be tricky for (my) human eyeballs.
* un-exported the functions that were created as part of the EvalTree()
refactor; they did not need to be public.
We no longer need to support 0.12-and-earlier-style provider addresses
because users should've upgraded their existing configurations and states
on Terraform 0.13 already.
For now this is only checked in the "init" command, because various test
shims are still relying on the idea of legacy providers the core layer.
However, rejecting these during init is sufficient grounds to avoid
supporting legacy provider addresses in the new dependency lock file
format, and thus sets the stage for a more severe removal of legacy
provider support in a later commit.
The tmp directory path is longer on Macs than other systems and was wrapping
across lines when printed, breaking the string match in the test.
Fix suggested by @apparentlymart is to add two spaces before the leading
'-' when printing to prevent the diagnostic renderer wrapping the line.
As we add and remove support for different target platforms over time,
there will be transition periods where the available platforms for
each provider will be different than the available platforms for Terraform
CLI itself.
In recognition of that possibility, here we add a more specialized error
message for that situation which tries to explain the problem a little
more clearly than the generic error message that came before it.
In an ideal world we'd be able to detect situations where a newer or older
version has support in a similar vein to what we do with provider protocol
incompatibilities, but we don't currently have logic to fetch the data
necessary to implement that, so this is instead a presentation-only change
aimed at allowing some possible near-future changes to the supported
target platforms.
function
The original EvalReadState node is used only by `NodeAbstractResource`s,
so I've created a new method on NodeAbstractResource which does the same
thing as EvalReadState. When the EvalNode refactor project is complete,
EvalReadState will be removed entirely.
In order to ensure all the starting values agree, and since
ignore_changes is only meant to apply to the configuration, we need to
process the ignore_changes values on the config itself rather than the
proposed value.
This ensures the proposed new value and the config value seen by
providers are coordinated, and still allows us to use the rules laid out
by objchange.AssertPlanValid to compare the result to the configuration.
Pam Selle