Fixes#7053 where, when using `additional_unattend_config` in
`os_profile_windows_config` we got an error as follows:
```
azurerm_virtual_machine.test: [DEBUG] Error setting Virtual Machine
Storage OS Profile Windows Configuration: &errors.errorString{s:"Invalid
address to set: []string{\"os_profile_windows_config\", \"1534614206\",
\"additional_unattend_config\"}"}
```
apply
The IP COnfiguration block of `azurerm_network_interface` didn't have a
hash created in a way that changes to the optional params were being
picked up:
```
~ azurerm_network_interface.test
ip_configuration.273485505.name: "testconfiguration1" => ""
ip_configuration.273485505.private_ip_address_allocation: "dynamic" => ""
ip_configuration.273485505.subnet_id: "/subscriptions/34ca515c-4629-458e-bf7c-738d77e0d0ea/resourceGroups/acctestrg/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/acctvn/subnets/acctsub" => ""
ip_configuration.~273485505.load_balancer_backend_address_pools_ids.#: "" => "<computed>"
ip_configuration.~273485505.load_balancer_inbound_nat_rules_ids.#: "" => "<computed>"
ip_configuration.~273485505.name: "" => "testconfiguration1"
ip_configuration.~273485505.private_ip_address: "" => "<computed>"
ip_configuration.~273485505.private_ip_address_allocation: "" => "dynamic"
ip_configuration.~273485505.public_ip_address_id: "" => "${azurerm_public_ip.test.id}"
ip_configuration.~273485505.subnet_id: "" => "/subscriptions/34ca515c-4629-458e-bf7c-738d77e0d0ea/resourceGroups/acctestrg/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/acctvn/subnets/acctsub"
```
This caused the following error:
```
Error applying plan:
1 error(s) occurred:
* azurerm_network_interface.test: diffs didn't match during apply. This is a bug with Terraform and should be reported as a GitHub Issue.
Please include the following information in your report:
```
Notice that the hash didn't change. This change adds the remaining optional params to the hash so that the hash id will change.
```
~ azurerm_network_interface.test
ip_configuration.4255411321.load_balancer_backend_address_pools_ids.#: "" => "<computed>"
ip_configuration.4255411321.load_balancer_inbound_nat_rules_ids.#: "" => "<computed>"
ip_configuration.4255411321.name: "" => "testconfiguration1"
ip_configuration.4255411321.private_ip_address: "" => "<computed>"
ip_configuration.4255411321.private_ip_address_allocation: "" => "dynamic"
ip_configuration.4255411321.public_ip_address_id: "" => "/subscriptions/34ca515c-4629-458e-bf7c-738d77e0d0ea/resourceGroups/acctestrg/providers/Microsoft.Network/publicIPAddresses/public-ip"
ip_configuration.4255411321.subnet_id: "" => "/subscriptions/34ca515c-4629-458e-bf7c-738d77e0d0ea/resourceGroups/acctestrg/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/acctvn/subnets/acctsub"
ip_configuration.966273186.name: "testconfiguration1" => ""
ip_configuration.966273186.private_ip_address_allocation: "dynamic" => ""
ip_configuration.966273186.subnet_id: "/subscriptions/34ca515c-4629-458e-bf7c-738d77e0d0ea/resourceGroups/acctestrg/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/acctvn/subnets/acctsub" => ""
```
This allows the Update to work as expected :)
```
azurerm_network_interface.test: Modifications complete
Apply complete! Resources: 0 added, 1 changed, 0 destroyed.
```
`azurerm_storage_account` access keys
Please note that we do NOT have the ability to manage the access keys -
we are just getting the keys that the account creates for us. To manage
the keys, you would need to use the azure portal still
* Adding private ip address reference
* adding private ip address reference
* Updating the docs.
* Removing optional attrib from private_ip_address
Removing optional attribute from private_ip_address, this element is only being used in the read.
* Selecting the first element instead of using a loop for now.
Change this to a loop when https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/issues/259 is fixed
The `storage_data_disk` was trying to use vhd_url rather than vhd_uri.
This was causing an error on creating a new data_disk as part of a VM
Also added validation as data_disks can only be 1 - 1023 GB in size
ssh_keys were throwing an error similar to this:
```
* azurerm_virtual_machine.test: [DEBUG] Error setting Virtual Machine
* Storage OS Profile Linux Configuration: &errors.errorString{s:"Invalid
* address to set: []string{\"os_profile_linux_config\", \"0\",
* \"ssh_keys\"}"}
```
This was because of nesting of Set within a Set in the schema. By
changing this to a List within a Set, the schema works as expected. This
means we can now set SSH Keys on VMs. This has been tested using a
remote-exec and a connection block with the ssh key
```
azurerm_virtual_machine.test: Still creating... (2m10s elapsed)
azurerm_virtual_machine.test (remote-exec): Connected!
azurerm_virtual_machine.test (remote-exec): CONNECTED!
```
adminPassword
The Azure API never returns the AdminPAssword (as is correct) from the
Read API call. Therefore on Create, we do not set the AdminPassword of
the vm as part of the state. The Same func is used for Create & Update,
therefore when we changed anything on the VM, we were getting the
following error:
```
statusCode:Conflict
serviceRequestId:f498a6c8-6e7a-420f-9788-400f18078921
statusMessage:{"error":{"code":"PropertyChangeNotAllowed","target":"adminPassword","message":"Changing property 'adminPassword' is not allowed."}}
```
To fix this, we need to excldue the AdminPassword from the Update func
if it is empty
The azure tests relating to cdn endpoints (TestAccAzureRMCdnEndpoint_basic
etc) are breaking because ARM is not accepting port values of 0. The
following error is received:
statusCode:BadRequest
statusMessage:{"error":{"code":"BadRequest","message":"Invalid port \"0\". Port value must be a number between 1 and 65535."}}
This patch sets the ports for example.com to 443 and 80.
This commit uses Riviera to register the Microsoft.Compute provider as a
canary for whether or not the Azure account credentials are set up. It
used to use the MS client, but that appeared to panic internally if the
credentials were bad. It's possible that we were using it wrong, but
there are no docs so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
As part of this, we parellelise the registration of the other providers.
This shaves the latency of each provider request times the number of
providers minus 1 off the "startup" time of the AzureRM provider. The
result is quite noticeable.
This resource is the first which makes use of the new Riviera library
(at https://github.com/jen20/riviera), so there is some additional set
up work to add the provider to the client which gets passed among
resources.
Using EnvDefaultFunc with a default of empty string causes the
validation which would ordinarily be performed by `Required: true` in
the schema to not have any effect. Instead validate the configuration
used to produce the ARM client before attempting to use it during
provider configuration.
These resources use ARM to get keys for the storage API, but then use
the storage REST API as per the ASM provider. The code is significantly
reworked with better logging and error handling. The key functions can
be reused for queues and file storage resources when they get added.
This is an unusual resource (so far) in that it cannot be created in one
call, and instead must be created and the modified to set some of the
parameters.
We use the pollIndefinitelyWhileNeeded function which will continue to
poll Azure RM operation monitoring endpoints until an error is reported
or the operation meets one of the given status codes. The function was
originally part of this feature but was separated out in order to
unblock other work.
Currently there is no support for the "custom_domain" section of the
storage account API. This was originally present and was later taken out
of the scope of the storage account resource in order that the following
workflow can be used:
1. Create storage account
2. Create DNS CNAME entry once the account name is known
3. Create custom domain mapping
This adds a pollIndefinitelyWhileNeeded function which will continue to
poll Azure RM operation monitoring endpoints until an error is reported
or the operation meets one of the given status codes. This may need
revisiting at some point in the future.
When parsing resource IDs (probably incorrectly since they are URIs and
should therefore be opaque), we need to look for "resourcegroups" in
addition to "resourceGroups" because the Azure CDN resources return that
in their URIs.
Unfortunately the casing semantics of the rest of the string are not
clear, so downcasing the entire URI is probably best avoided. This is a
fix for a single case.
This diff represents the changes necessary to make local network
gateway tests pass:
- Parse the resource ID instead of relying on attributes
- Remove unecessary logging (which is handled via the autorest wrapper)
- Resource GUID is removed - if this is actually required for anything
we may need to find a way to supress it during apply, as we get
spurious diffs in plans otherwise.
- Various typos fixed.
- Add documentation for resources
- Rename files to match standard patterns
- Add acceptance tests for resource groups
- Add acceptance tests for vnets
- Remove ARM_CREDENTIALS file - as discussed this does not appear to be
an Azure standard, and there is scope for confusion with the
azureProfile.json file which the CLI generates. If a standard emerges
we can reconsider this.
- Validate credentials in the schema
- Remove storage testing artefacts
- Use ARM IDs as Terraform IDs
- Use autorest hooks for logging
This commit cleans up some of the work on the Azure ARM provider
following review by @phinze. Specifically:
- Unnecessary ASM-targeted tests are removed
- Validation is added to the `resource_group` resource
- `dns_servers_names` -> `dns_servers` as per the API documentation
- AZURE_SUBSCRIPTION_ID environment variable is renamed to be
ARM_SUBSCRIPTION_ID in order to match the other environment variables
This commit brings some of the work over from #3808, but rearchitects to
use a separate provider for Azure Resource Manager. This is in line with
the decisions made by the Azure Powershell Cmdlets, and is important for
usability since the sets of required fields change between the ASM and
ARM APIs.
Currently `azurerm_resource_group` and `azurerm_virtual_network` are
implemented, more resources will follow.
Paul Hinze