Previously we checked can-update in order to determine if a user had the
required permissions to apply a run, but that wasn't sufficient. So we
added a new permission, can-queue-apply, that we now use instead.
The handling of slashes was broken around listing workspaces in
workspace_key_prefix. While it worked in most places by splitting an
extra time around the spurious slashes, it failed in the case that the
prefix ended with a slash of its own.
A test was temporarily added to verify that the backend works with the
unusual keys, but rather than risking silent breakage around prefixes
with trailing slashes, we also add validation to prevent users from
entering keys with trailing slashes at all.
The init error was output deep in the backend by detecting a
special ResourceProviderError and formatted directly to the CLI.
Create some Diagnostics closer to where the problem is detected, and
passed that back through the normal diagnostic flow. While the output
isn't as nice yet, this restores the helpful error message and makes the
code easier to maintain. Better formatting can be handled later.
The API surface area is much smaller when we use the remote backend for remote state only.
So in order to try and prevent any backwards incompatibilities when TF runs inside of TFE, we’ve split up the discovery services into `state.v2` (which can be used for remote state only configurations, so when running in TFE) and `tfe.v2.1` (which can be used for all remote configurations).
This changes the contract for `PlanResourceChange` so that the provider is now responsible
for populating all default values during plan, including inserting any unknown values for
defaults it will fill in at apply time.
We've changed the contract for PlanResourceChange to now require the
provider to populate any default values (including unknowns) it wants to
set for computed arguments, so our mock provider here now needs to be a
little more complex to deal with that.
This fixes several of the tests in this package. A minor change to
TestLocal_applyEmptyDirDestroy was required to make it properly configure
the mock provider so PlanResourceChange can access the schema.
In Terraform 0.11 and earlier we just silently ignored undeclared
variables in -var-file and the automatically-loaded .tfvars files. This
was a bad user experience for anyone who made a typo in a variable name
and got no feedback about it, so we made this an error for 0.12.
However, several users are now relying on the silent-ignore behavior for
automation scenarios where they pass the same .tfvars file to all
configurations in their organization and expect Terraform to ignore any
settings that are not relevant to a specific configuration. We never
intentionally supported that, but we don't want to immediately break that
workflow during 0.12 upgrade.
As a compromise, then, we'll make this a warning for v0.12.0 that contains
a deprecation notice suggesting to move to using environment variables
for this "cross-configuration variables" use-case. We don't produce errors
for undeclared variables in environment variables, even though that
potentially causes the same UX annoyance as ignoring them in vars files,
because environment variables are assumed to live in the user's session
and this it would be very inconvenient to have to unset such variables
when moving between directories. Their "ambientness" makes them a better
fit for these automatically-assigned general variable values that may or
may not be used by a particular configuration.
This can revert to being an error in a future major release, after users
have had the opportunity to migrate their automation solutions over to
use environment variables.
We don't seem to have any tests covering this specific situation right
now. That isn't ideal, but this change is so straightforward that it would
be relatively expensive to build new targeted test cases for it and so
I instead just hand-tested that it is indeed now producing a warning where
we were previously producing an error. Hopefully if there is any more
substantial work done on this codepath in future that will be our prompt
to add some unit tests for this.
The AWS Go SDK automatically provides a default request retryer with exponential backoff that is invoked via setting `MaxRetries` or leaving it `nil` will default to 3. The terraform-aws-provider `config.Client()` sets `MaxRetries` to 0 unless explicitly configured above 0. Previously, we were not overriding this behavior by setting the configuration and therefore not invoking the default request retryer.
The default retryer already handles HTTP error codes above 500, including S3's InternalError response, so the extraneous handling can be removed. This will also start automatically retrying many additional cases, such as temporary networking issues or other retryable AWS service responses.
Changes:
* s3/backend: Add `max_retries` argument
* s3/backend: Enhance S3 NoSuchBucket error to include additional information
* Upgrading to 2.0.0 of github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-helpers
* Support for authenticating using Azure CLI
* backend/azurerm: support for authenticating using the Azure CLI
This PR improves the error handling so we can provide better feedback about any service discovery errors that occured.
Additionally it adds logic to test for specific versions when discovering a service using `service.vN`. This will enable more informational errors which can indicate any version incompatibilities.
This change enables a few related use cases:
* AWS has partitions outside Commercial, GovCloud (US), and China, which are the only endpoints automatically handled by the AWS Go SDK. DynamoDB locking and credential verification can not currently be enabled in those regions.
* Allows usage of any DynamoDB-compatible API for state locking
* Allows usage of any IAM/STS-compatible API for credential verification
Use the entitlements to a) determine if the organization exists, and b) as a means to select which backend to use (the local backend with remote state, or the remote backend).
Variables values are marshalled with an explicit type of
cty.DynamicPseudoType, but were being decoded using `Implied Type` to
try and guess the type. This was causing errors because `Implied Type`
does not expect to find a late-bound value.
If an instance object in state has an earlier schema version number then
it is likely that the schema we're holding won't be able to decode the
raw data that is stored. Instead, we must ask the provider to upgrade it
for us first, which might also include translating it from flatmap form
if it was last updated with a Terraform version earlier than v0.12.
This ends up being a "seam" between our use of int64 for schema versions
in the providers package and uint64 everywhere else. We intend to
standardize on int64 everywhere eventually, but for now this remains
consistent with existing usage in each layer to keep the type conversion
noise contained here and avoid mass-updates to other Terraform components
at this time.
This also includes a minor change to the test helpers for the
backend/local package, which were inexplicably setting a SchemaVersion of
1 on the basic test state but setting the mock schema version to zero,
creating an invalid situation where the state would need to be downgraded.
Add support for the new `force-unlock` API and at the same time improve
performance a bit by reducing the amount of API calls made when using
the remote backend for state storage only.
Previously we were fetching these from the provider but then immediately
discarding the version numbers because the schema API had nowhere to put
them.
To avoid a late-breaking change to the internal structure of
terraform.ProviderSchema (which is constructed directly all over the
tests) we're retaining the resource type schemas in a new map alongside
the existing one with the same keys, rather than just switching to
using the providers.Schema struct directly there.
The methods that return resource type schemas now return two arguments,
intentionally creating a little API friction here so each new caller can
be reminded to think about whether they need to do something with the
schema version, though it can be ignored by many callers.
Since this was a breaking change to the Schemas API anyway, this also
fixes another API wart where there was a separate method for fetching
managed vs. data resource types and thus every caller ended up having a
switch statement on "mode". Now we just accept mode as an argument and
do the switch statement within the single SchemaForResourceType method.
* backend/azurerm: removing the `arm_` prefix from keys
* removing the deprecated fields test because the deprecation makes it fail
* authentication: support for custom resource manager endpoints
* Adding debug prefixes to the log statements
* adding acceptance tests for msi auth
* including the resource group name in the tests
* backend/azurerm: support for authenticating using a SAS Token
* resolving merge conflicts
* moving the defer to prior to the error
* backend/azurerm: support for authenticating via msi
* adding acceptance tests for msi auth
* including the resource group name in the tests
* support for using the test client via msi
* vendor updates
- updating to v21.3.0 of github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go
- updating to v10.15.4 of github.com/Azure/go-autorest
- vendoring github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-helpers @ 0.1.1
* backend/azurerm: refactoring to use the new auth package
- refactoring the backend to use a shared client via the new auth package
- adding tests covering both Service Principal and Access Key auth
- support for authenticating using a proxy
- rewriting the backend documentation to include examples of both authentication types
* switching to use the build-in logging function
* documenting it's also possible to retrieve the access key from an env var
In order to support free organizations, we need a way to load the `remote` backend and then, depending on the used offering/plan, enable or disable remote operations.
In other words, we should be able to dynamically fall back to the `local` backend if needed, after first configuring the `remote` backend.
To make this works we need to change the way this was done previously when the env var `TF_FORCE_LOCAL_BACKEND` was set. The clear difference of course being that the env var would be available on startup, while the used offering/plan is only known after being able to connect to TFE.
The changes to how we handle setting the state path on the local backend
broke the heuristic we were using here for detecting migration from one
local backend to another with the same state path, which would by default
end up deleting the state altogether after migration.
We now use the StatePaths method to do this, which takes into account
both the default values and any settings that have been set.
Additionally this addresses a flaw in the old method which could
potentially have deleted all non-default workspace state files if the
"path" setting were changed without also changing the "workspace_dir"
setting. This new approach is conservative because it will preserve all
of the files if any one overlaps.
This was failing because we now handle the settings for the local backend
a little differently as a result of decoding it with the HCL2 machinery.
Specifically, the backend.State* fields are now assumed to be what is
given in configuration, and any CLI overrides are maintained separately
in OverrideState* fields so that they can be imposed "just in time" in
StatePaths.
This is particularly important because OverrideStatePath (when set) is
used regardless of workspace name, while StatePath is a suitable value
only for the "default" workspace, with others needing to be constructed
from StateWorkspaceDir instead.
Newer versions of the retryablehttp package use a context, so we need to
add that in our custom `CheckRetry` function.
In addition I removed the `return true, nil` to continue retrying in
case of an error, and instead directly call the `DefaultRetryPolicy`.
This is because the `DefaultRetryPolicy` will now also take the context
into consideration.
This new source type should be used for variables loaded from .tfvars files that were explicitly passed as command line arguments (e.g. -var-file=foo.tfvars)
This work was done against APIs that were already changed in the branch
before work began, and so it doesn't apply to the v0.12 development work.
To allow v0.12 to merge down to master, we'll revert this work out for now
and then re-introduce equivalent functionality in later commits that works
against the new APIs.
There are several steps here and a number of them can include reaching out
to remote servers or executing local processes, so it's helpful to have
some trace logs to better narrow down causes of errors and hangs during
this step.
In earlier refactoring we skipped implementing prior state safety checks,
propagating the target addresses from plan, and verifying that all of
the providers are exactly the same from the plan being created.
This change reinstates those checks, including a new error message for
the "stale plan" situation.
If we don't do this, we can't produce any output when applying a saved
plan file.
Here we also introduce a check to the local backend's ReportResult
function so that it won't panic if CLI init is skipped, although that
will no longer happen in the apply-from-file case due to the change
described in the previous paragraph.
We can't generate a valid plan file without a backend configuration to
write into it, but it's the responsibility of the caller (the command
package) to manage the backend configuration mechanism, so we require it
to tell us what to write here.
This feels a little strange because the backend in principle knows its
own config, but in practice the backend only knows the _processed_ version
of the config, not the raw configuration value that was used to configure
it.
converted the existing testPlanState() from terraform.State to
states.State to fix various plan tests.
reverted the "bandaid" in plans/planfile/tfplan.go - at this moment the
backend tests do not include backend configuration, and so the planfile
package can write the plan file but not read it back in. That will be
revisted in a separate track of work.
I have no confidence in the change to plans/planfile/tfplan.go. The
tests were passing an empty backend config, which planfile was able to
write to a file but not read from the same file. This change let me move
past that and it did not break any tests in the planfile package, but I
am concerned that it introduces undesired behavior.
The state manager refactoring in an earlier commit was reflected in the
implementations of these backends, but not in their tests. This gets us
back to a state where the backend tests will compile, and gets _most_ of
them passing again, with a few exceptions that will be addressed in a
subsequent commit.
incoming values
Addresses an odd state where the priorV of an object to be changed is
known but null.
While this situation should not happen, it seemed prudent to ensure that
core is resilient to providers sending incorrect values (which might
also occur with manually edited state).
Previously we used a single plan action "Replace" to represent both the
destroy-before-create and the create-before-destroy variants of replacing.
However, this forces the apply graph builder to jump through a lot of
hoops to figure out which nodes need it forced on and rebuild parts of
the graph to represent that.
If we instead decide between these two cases at plan time, the actual
determination of it is more straightforward because each resource is
represented by only one node in the plan graph, and then we can ensure
we put the right nodes in the graph during DiffTransformer and thus avoid
the logic for dealing with deposed instances being spread across various
different transformers and node types.
As a nice side-effect, this also allows us to show the difference between
destroy-then-create and create-then-destroy in the rendered diff in the
CLI, although this change doesn't fully implement that yet.
We're not yet showing outputs in the rendered diff, so it doesn't make
sense to count them for the purpose of deciding which change action
symbols to include in the legend.
This is a light adaptation of our earlier prototype of structural diff
rendering, as a starting point for what we'll actually ship. This is not
consistent with the latest mocks, so will need some additional work before
it is ready, but integrating this allows us to at least see the plan
contents while fixing up remaining issues elsewhere.
Sander van Harmelen