Commit Graph

28 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alisdair McDiarmid b2ba650c21 cli: Remove deprecated destroy -force flag
This dramatically simplifies the logic around auto-approve, which is
nice.

Also add test coverage for the manual approve step, for both apply and
destroy, answering both yes and no.
2021-02-03 15:05:05 -05:00
James Bardin 3bc7d77230 update MockProvider usage 2021-01-12 17:47:55 -05:00
Kristin Laemmert 0af09b23ca command: apply and most of import tests passing 2020-04-06 09:24:23 -07:00
James Bardin b3fc0dab94 use addrs.ConfigResource for dependency tracking
We can't get module instances during transformation, so we need to
reduce the Dependencies to using `addrs.ConfigResource` for now.
2020-03-25 17:03:06 -04:00
James Bardin e13eecbc5b finish provider ModuleInstance replacement 2020-03-11 14:19:52 -04:00
James Bardin dc8cdd260c add missing deps to targeted destroy test 2020-02-13 15:43:52 -05:00
Kristin Laemmert 47a16b0937
addrs: embed Provider in AbsProviderConfig instead of Type
a large refactor to addrs.AbsProviderConfig, embedding the addrs.Provider instead of a Type string. I've added and updated tests, added some Legacy functions to support older state formats and shims, and added a normalization step when reading v4 (current) state files (not the added tests under states/statefile/roundtrip which work with both current and legacy-style AbsProviderConfig strings).

The remaining 'fixme' and 'todo' comments are mostly going to be addressed in a subsequent PR and involve looking up a given local provider config's FQN. This is fine for now as we are only working with default assumption.
2020-02-13 15:32:58 -05:00
Martin Atkins 8b511524d6
Initial steps towards AbsProviderConfig/LocalProviderConfig separation (#23978)
* Introduce "Local" terminology for non-absolute provider config addresses

In a future change AbsProviderConfig and LocalProviderConfig are going to
become two entirely distinct types, rather than Abs embedding Local as
written here. This naming change is in preparation for that subsequent
work, which will also include introducing a new "ProviderConfig" type
that is an interface that AbsProviderConfig and LocalProviderConfig both
implement.

This is intended to be largely just a naming change to get started, so
we can deal with all of the messy renaming. However, this did also require
a slight change in modeling where the Resource.DefaultProviderConfig
method has become Resource.DefaultProvider returning a Provider address
directly, because this method doesn't have enough information to construct
a true and accurate LocalProviderConfig -- it would need to refer to the
configuration to know what this module is calling the provider it has
selected.

In order to leave a trail to follow for subsequent work, all of the
changes here are intended to ensure that remaining work will become
obvious via compile-time errors when all of the following changes happen:
- The concept of "legacy" provider addresses is removed from the addrs
  package, including removing addrs.NewLegacyProvider and
  addrs.Provider.LegacyString.
- addrs.AbsProviderConfig stops having addrs.LocalProviderConfig embedded
  in it and has an addrs.Provider and a string alias directly instead.
- The provider-schema-handling parts of Terraform core are updated to
  work with addrs.Provider to identify providers, rather than legacy
  strings.

In particular, there are still several codepaths here making legacy
provider address assumptions (in order to limit the scope of this change)
but I've made sure each one is doing something that relies on at least
one of the above changes not having been made yet.

* addrs: ProviderConfig interface

In a (very) few special situations in the main "terraform" package we need
to make runtime decisions about whether a provider config is absolute
or local.

We currently do that by exploiting the fact that AbsProviderConfig has
LocalProviderConfig nested inside of it and so in the local case we can
just ignore the wrapping AbsProviderConfig and use the embedded value.

In a future change we'll be moving away from that embedding and making
these two types distinct in order to represent that mapping between them
requires consulting a lookup table in the configuration, and so here we
introduce a new interface type ProviderConfig that can represent either
AbsProviderConfig or LocalProviderConfig decided dynamically at runtime.

This also includes the Config.ResolveAbsProviderAddr method that will
eventually be responsible for that local-to-absolute translation, so
that callers with access to the configuration can normalize to an
addrs.AbsProviderConfig given a non-nil addrs.ProviderConfig. That's
currently unused because existing callers are still relying on the
simplistic structural transform, but we'll switch them over in a later
commit.

* rename LocalType to LocalName

Co-authored-by: Kristin Laemmert <mildwonkey@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-01-31 08:23:07 -05:00
Kristin Laemmert 6541775ce4
addrs: roll back change to Type field in ProviderConfig (#23937) 2020-01-28 08:13:30 -05:00
Kristin Laemmert e3416124cc
addrs: replace "Type string" with "Type Provider" in ProviderConfig
* huge change to weave new addrs.Provider into addrs.ProviderConfig
* terraform: do not include an empty string in the returned Providers /
Provisioners
- Fixed a minor bug where results included an extra empty string
2019-12-06 08:00:18 -05:00
Sander van Harmelen 79a9a15879 command/state: lock when pushing state
Next to adding the locking for the `state push` command, this commit also fixes a small bug where the lock would not be propertly released when running the `state show` command.

And finally it renames some variables in the `[un]taint` code in order to try to standardize the var names of a few frequently used variables (e.g. statemgr.Full, states.State, states.SyncState).
2018-11-20 11:15:16 +01:00
Martin Atkins 73318a436b command: go fmt 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
Martin Atkins 5021e0e098 command: Fix TestApply_destroyTargeted for new provider and state types 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
Martin Atkins db3ea65e8b command: Fix TestApply_destroy for new provider and state types 2018-10-16 19:14:11 -07:00
Martin Atkins a3403f2766 terraform: Ugly huge change to weave in new State and Plan types
Due to how often the state and plan types are referenced throughout
Terraform, there isn't a great way to switch them out gradually. As a
consequence, this huge commit gets us from the old world to a _compilable_
new world, but still has a large number of known test failures due to
key functionality being stubbed out.

The stubs here are for anything that interacts with providers, since we
now need to do the follow-up work to similarly replace the old
terraform.ResourceProvider interface with its replacement in the new
"providers" package. That work, along with work to fix the remaining
failing tests, will follow in subsequent commits.

The aim here was to replace all references to terraform.State and its
downstream types with states.State, terraform.Plan with plans.Plan,
state.State with statemgr.State, and switch to the new implementations of
the state and plan file formats. However, due to the number of times those
types are used, this also ended up affecting numerous other parts of core
such as terraform.Hook, the backend.Backend interface, and most of the CLI
commands.

Just as with 5861dbf3fc49b19587a31816eb06f511ab861bb4 before, I apologize
in advance to the person who inevitably just found this huge commit while
spelunking through the commit history.
2018-10-16 19:11:09 -07:00
Martin Atkins 479c6b2466 move "configschema" from "config" to "configs"
The "config" package is no longer used and will be removed as part
of the 0.12 release cleanup. Since configschema is part of the
"new world" of configuration modelling, it makes more sense for
it to live as a subdirectory of the newer "configs" package.
2018-10-16 18:50:29 -07:00
Martin Atkins a270a18a4d command: Update tests for changes in "terraform" package
This is not exhaustive, but it gets the tests in this package compiling
again and gets most of them working.
2018-10-16 18:49:20 -07:00
Laura Martin 6e1e614a56 Change -force to -auto-approve when destroying
Since an early version of Terraform, the `destroy` command has always
had the `-force` flag to allow an auto approval of the interactive
prompt. 0.11 introduced `-auto-approve` as default to `false` when using
the `apply` command.

The `-auto-approve` flag was introduced to reduce ambiguity of it's
function, but the `-force` flag was never updated for a destroy.

People often use wrappers when automating commands in Terraform, and the
inconsistency between `apply` and `destroy` means that additional logic
must be added to the wrappers to do similar functions. Both commands are
more or less able to run with similar syntax, and also heavily share
their code.

This commit updates the command in `destroy` to use the `-auto-approve` flag
making working with the Terraform CLI a more consistent experience.

We leave in `-force` in `destroy` for the time-being and flag it as
deprecated to ensure a safe switchover period.
2018-02-01 00:14:42 +00:00
Martin Atkins 8364383c35 Push plugin discovery down into command package
Previously we did plugin discovery in the main package, but as we move
towards versioned plugins we need more information available in order to
resolve plugins, so we move this responsibility into the command package
itself.

For the moment this is just preserving the existing behavior as long as
there are only internal and unversioned plugins present. This is the
final state for provisioners in 0.10, since we don't want to support
versioned provisioners yet. For providers this is just a checkpoint along
the way, since further work is required to apply version constraints from
configuration and support additional plugin search directories.

The automatic plugin discovery behavior is not desirable for tests because
we want to mock the plugins there, so we add a new backdoor for the tests
to use to skip the plugin discovery and just provide their own mock
implementations. Most of this diff is thus noisy rework of the tests to
use this new mechanism.
2017-06-09 14:03:59 -07:00
James Bardin ec00564be6 Clean up LockInfo and LockError and use them
Gove LockInfo a Marshal method for easy serialization, and a String
method for more readable output.

Have the state.Locker implementations use LockError when possible to
return LockInfo and an error.
2017-02-15 14:44:43 -05:00
James Bardin f2e496a14c Have backend operations properly unlock state
Make sure unlock is called with the correct LockID during operations
2017-02-15 14:41:55 -05:00
James Bardin b80ae5e13e Add source path argument to testLockState
The new test pattern is to chdir into a temp location for the test, but
the prevents us from locating the testdata directory in the source. Add
a source path to testLockState so we can find the statelocker.go source.
2017-02-06 13:50:01 -05:00
James Bardin 82e59cd826 Add test for destroy with locked state 2017-02-03 16:06:01 -05:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 785cc7b78a
terraform: default new graphs on, old graphs behind -Xlegacy-graph
This turns the new graphs on by default and puts the old graphs behind a
flag `-Xlegacy-graph`. This effectively inverts the current 0.7.x
behavior with the new graphs.

We've incubated most of these for a few weeks now. We've found issues
and we've fixed them and we've been using these graphs internally for
awhile without any major issue. Its time to default them on and get them
part of a beta.
2016-11-10 21:53:20 -08:00
Anthony Scalisi 198e1a5186 remove various typos 2015-09-11 11:56:20 -07:00
Paul Hinze 97acccd3ed core: targeted operations
Add `-target=resource` flag to core operations, allowing users to
target specific resources in their infrastructure. When `-target` is
used, the operation will only apply to that resource and its
dependencies.

The calculated dependencies are different depending on whether we're
running a normal operation or a `terraform destroy`.

Generally, "dependencies" refers to ancestors: resources falling
_before_ the target in the graph, because their changes are required to
accurately act on the target.

For destroys, "dependencies" are descendents: those resources which fall
_after_ the target. These resources depend on our target, which is going
to be destroyed, so they should also be destroyed.
2015-03-31 14:49:38 -05:00
Mitchell Hashimoto a5f70ead2d command: destroy should ask for confirmation always 2014-10-03 16:08:50 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto ab9dd71bcb command/destroy: first steps 2014-09-30 21:49:24 -07:00