Fixes:#11750
Before this change, adding a log_subscription_filter and then deleting
it manually would yield this error on terraform plan/apply:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_role.iam_for_lambda: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123)
aws_cloudwatch_log_group.logs: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name)
aws_iam_role_policy.test_lambdafunction_iam_policy: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123:test_lambdafunction_iam_policy)
aws_lambda_function.test_lambdafunction: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name_example123)
aws_lambda_permission.allow_cloudwatch_logs: Refreshing state... (ID: AllowExecutionFromCloudWatchLogs)
aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Refreshing state... (ID: cwlsf-992677504)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Subscription filter for log group example_lambda_name with name prefix test_lambdafunction_logfilter not found!
```
After this patch, we get the following behaviour:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_role.iam_for_lambda: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123)
aws_cloudwatch_log_group.logs: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name)
aws_lambda_function.test_lambdafunction: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name_example123)
aws_iam_role_policy.test_lambdafunction_iam_policy: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123:test_lambdafunction_iam_policy)
aws_lambda_permission.allow_cloudwatch_logs: Refreshing state... (ID: AllowExecutionFromCloudWatchLogs)
aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Refreshing state... (ID: cwlsf-992677504)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter
destination_arn: "arn:aws:lambda:us-west-2:187416307283:function:example_lambda_name_example123"
filter_pattern: "logtype test"
log_group_name: "example_lambda_name"
name: "test_lambdafunction_logfilter"
role_arn: "<computed>"
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
Fixes: #12232
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags (39.51s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 39.537s
```
A couple interpolation tests were using invalid state that didn't match
the config. These will still pass but were flushed out by an attempt to
make this an error. The repl however still required interpolation
without a config, and tests there will provide a indication if this
behavior changes.
It turns out that a few use cases depend on not finding a resource
without an error.
The other code paths had sufficient nil checks for this, but there was
one place where we called Count() that needed to be checked. If the
existence of the resource matters, it would be caught at a higher level
and still return an "unknown resource" error to the user.
For historical reasons, sets are represented as sparse lists in a
flatmap, however a computed set does not have a numeric index.
Strip the `~` flag from a computed set's index during expansion, and add
it back in the prefix after sorting.
not found
Fixes: #12279
When manually deleting an autoscaling_group from the console, a
terraform plan would look as follows:
```
% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_launch_configuration.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test-0096cf26c7eebdc9fcb5bd1837)
aws_autoscaling_group.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test)
aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Error retrieving Autoscaling Scheduled Actions: ValidationError: Group test not found
status code: 400, request id: 093e9ed5-fe01-11e6-b990-1f64334b3a10
```
After this patch:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_launch_configuration.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test-0096cf26c7eebdc9fcb5bd1837)
aws_autoscaling_group.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test)
aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_autoscaling_group.foobar
arn: "<computed>"
availability_zones.#: "1"
availability_zones.2487133097: "us-west-2a"
default_cooldown: "<computed>"
desired_capacity: "<computed>"
force_delete: "true"
health_check_grace_period: "300"
health_check_type: "ELB"
launch_configuration: "test-0096cf26c7eebdc9fcb5bd1837"
load_balancers.#: "<computed>"
max_size: "1"
metrics_granularity: "1Minute"
min_size: "1"
name: "test"
protect_from_scale_in: "false"
tag.#: "1"
tag.157008572.key: "Foo"
tag.157008572.propagate_at_launch: "true"
tag.157008572.value: "foo-bar"
termination_policies.#: "1"
termination_policies.0: "OldestInstance"
vpc_zone_identifier.#: "<computed>"
wait_for_capacity_timeout: "10m"
+ aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar
arn: "<computed>"
autoscaling_group_name: "test"
desired_capacity: "0"
end_time: "2017-12-12T06:00:00Z"
max_size: "1"
min_size: "0"
recurrence: "<computed>"
scheduled_action_name: "foobar"
start_time: "2017-12-11T18:00:00Z"
Plan: 2 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
Jasmin Gacic