* provider/gitlab: add `gitlab_deploy_key`
Here we extend the gitlab provider further by adding a `gitlab_deploy_key`
resource. This resource allows management of a projects deploy
keys.
* provider/gitlab: Do not test `gitlab_deploy_key` `can_push`
Here we remove the testing of the `can_push` attribute. This makes the
tests less comprehensive, but will allow them to work with the current
release of gitlab-ce.
This change is staged as a distinct commit so it can be easily
dropped/reverted once gitlab MR !11607 has reached a released state.
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/11607
* provider/gitlab: Update docs for gitlab_deploy_key/can_push
Note that the can_push attribute of gitlab_deploy_key doesn't currently
work. This note can be removed once
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/11607 is merged
and in general circulation.
Here we add a new resource type `gitlab_project_hook`. It allows for
management of custom hooks for a gitlab project.
This is a relatively simple resource as a project hook is a simple
association between a project, and a url to hit when one of the flagged
events occurs on that project.
Hooks (called Webhooks in some user documentation, but simply Hooks
in the api documentation) are covered here for users
https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/user/project/integrations/webhooks.html and
in the API documentation at
https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/projects.html#hooks
Here we add a basic provider with a single resource type.
It's copied heavily from the `github` provider and `github_repository`
resource, as there is some overlap in those types/apis.
~~~
resource "gitlab_project" "test1" {
name = "test1"
visibility_level = "public"
}
~~~
We implement in terms of the
[go-gitlab](https://github.com/xanzy/go-gitlab) library, which provides
a wrapping of the [gitlab api](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/)
We have been a little selective in the properties we surface for the
project resource, as not all properties are very instructive.
Notable is the removal of the `public` bool as the `visibility_level`
will take precedent if both are supplied which leads to confusing
interactions if they disagree.
Richard Clamp