Fixes#8455, #5390
This add a new `no_device` attribute to `ephemeral_block_device` block,
which allows users omit ephemeral devices from AMI's predefined block
device mappings, which is useful for EBS-only instance types.
* add rds db for opsworks
* switched to stack in vpc
* implement update method
* add docs
* implement and document force new resource behavior
* implement retry for update and delete
* add test that forces new resource
* Add new aws_vpc_endpoint_route_table_association resource.
This commit adds a new resource which allows to a list of route tables to be
either added and/or removed from an existing VPC Endpoint. This resource would
also be complimentary to the existing `aws_vpc_endpoint` resource where the
route tables might not be specified (not a requirement for a VPC Endpoint to
be created successfully) during creation, especially where the workflow is
such where the route tables are not immediately known.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski <krzysztof.wilczynski@linux.com>
Additions by Kit Ewbank <Kit_Ewbank@hotmail.com>:
* Add functionality
* Add documentation
* Add acceptance tests
* Set VPC endpoint route_table_ids attribute to "Computed"
* Changes after review - Set resource ID in create function.
* Changes after code review by @kwilczynski:
* Removed error types and simplified the error handling in 'resourceAwsVPCEndpointRouteTableAssociationRead'
* Simplified logging in 'resourceAwsVPCEndpointRouteTableAssociationDelete'
* provider/aws: Add DeploymentRollback as a valid TriggerEvent type
* provider/aws: Add auto_rollback_configuration to aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Document auto_rollback_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Support removing and disabling auto_rollback_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group resource
- when removing configuration, ensure events are removed
- when disabling configuration, preserve events in case configuration is re-enabled
* provider/aws: Add alarm_configuration to aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Document alarm_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group
* provider/aws: Support removing alarm_configuration
- part of aws_codedeploy_deployment_group resource
- disabling configuration doesn't appear to work...
* provider/aws: Refactor auto_rollback_configuration tests
- Add create test
- SKIP failing test for now
- Add tests for build & map functions
* provider/aws: Refactor new aws_code_deploy_deployment_group tests
- alarm_configuration and auto_rollback_configuration only
- add assertions to deployment_group basic test
- rename config funcs to be more easy to read
- group public tests together
* provider/aws: A max of 10 alarms can be added to a deployment group.
- aws_code_deploy_deployment_group.alarm_configuration.alarms
- verified this causes test failure with expected exception
* provider/aws: Test disabling alarm_configuration and auto_rollback_configuration
- the tests now pass after rebasing the latest master branch
* provider/aws: Add ability to create aws_ebs_snapshot
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/10 14:18:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_
-timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_basic (31.56s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_withDescription
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEBSSnapshot_withDescription (189.35s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws220.928s
```
* docs/aws: Addition of the docs for aws_ebs_snapshot resource
* provider/aws: Creation of shared schema funcs for common AWS data source
patterns
* provider/aws: Create aws_ebs_snapshot datasource
Fixes#8828
This data source will use a number of filters, owner_ids, snapshot_ids
and restorable_by_user_ids in order to find the correct snapshot. The
data source has no real use case for most_recent and will error on no
snapshots found or greater than 1 snapshot found
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/10 14:34:33 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_basic (192.66s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_multipleFilters
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEbsSnapshotDataSource_multipleFilters (33.84s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws226.522s
```
* docs/aws: Addition of docs for the aws_ebs_snapshot data source
Adds the new resource `aws_ebs_snapshot`
When `force_destroy` was specifed on an `aws_iam_user` resource, only IAM
access keys and the login profile were destroyed. If a multi-factor auth
device had been activated for that user, deletion would fail as follows:
```
* aws_iam_user.testuser1: Error deleting IAM User testuser1: DeleteConflict: Cannot delete entity, must delete MFA device first.
status code: 409, request id: aa41b1b7-ac4d-11e6-bb3f-3b4c7a310c65
```
This commit iterates over any of the user's MFA devices and deactivates
them before deleting the user. It follows a pattern similar to that used
to remove users' IAM access keys before deletion.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSUser_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/20 17:09:00 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSUser_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSUser_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSUser_importBasic (5.70s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSUser_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSUser_basic (11.12s)
PASS
ok github.com/rhenning/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 20.840s
```
The docs for the CreateDBInstance API call include quite a bit more information about each individual option, (for example `Engine` has each of the possible options listed, whilst the cli reference doesn't).
Paul Stack