AccTests like TestAccComputeInstance_basic_deprecated_network were
failing early on "invalid config" when we are explictly testing behavior
that we know generates warnings.
* 'master' of github.com:hashicorp/terraform:
provider/aws: detach VPN gateway with proper ID
update CHANGELOG
provider/aws: Update ARN in instanceProfileReadResult
provider/aws: remove placement_group from acctest
core: module targeting
Added support for more complexly images repos such as images on a private registry that are stored as namespace/name
This fixes some perpetual diffs I saw in Atlas AccTests where an empty
map (`map[string]interface{}{}`) was being `d.Set` for "metadata_full".
Because the MapFieldWriter was not distinguishing between empty and nil,
this trigger the "map delete" logic and no count was written to the
state. This caused subsequent plans to improperly report a diff.
Here we redefine the map delete functionality to explicitly trigger only
on `nil`, so we catch the `.#` field for empty maps.
Depends on there being an existing placement group in the account called
"terraform-placement-group" - we'll need to circle back around to cover
this with AccTests after TF gets an `aws_placement_group` resource.
Adds the ability to target resources within modules, like:
module.mymod.aws_instance.foo
And the ability to target all resources inside a module, like:
module.mymod
Closes#1434
This reimplements my prior attempt at nipping issues where a plan did
not yield the same cycle an apply did. My prior attempt was to have
ctx.Validate generate a "Verbose" worst-case graph. It turns out that
skipping PruneDestroyTransformer to generate this graph misses important
heuristics that prevent cycles by dropping destroy nodes that are
determined to be unused.
This resulted in Validate improperly failing in scenarios where these
heuristics would have broken the cycle.
We detected the problem during the work on #1781 and worked around the
issue by reverting to the non-Verbose graph in Validate.
This commit accomplishes the original goal in a better way - by
generating the full graph and checking it once Plan has calculated the
diff. This guarantees that any graph issue that would be caught by Apply
will be caught by Plan.
Mitchell Hashimoto