This new struct avoids requiring to repeat the struct definition in this
code here. It avoids duplication and makes it more flexible so more
options can be added to the struct without breaking the code here.
The casing on the test name was causing it not to run with the entire
test suite
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws
% TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksStack' 2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/10/03 16:43:07 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksStack
-timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksStackImportBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackImportBasic (49.00s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksStackNoVpc
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackNoVpc (36.10s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksStackVpc
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackVpc (73.27s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws158.385s
```
As noticed in the acceptance tests, we were expecting the document to be
deleted but it was still found
```
=== RUN TestAccAWSSSMDocument_permission
--- FAIL: TestAccAWSSSMDocument_permission (5.60s)
testing.go:329: Error destroying resource! WARNING: Dangling
resources
may exist. The full state and error is shown below.
Error: Check failed: Expected AWS SSM
Document to be gone, but was still found
State: <no state>
```
If a resource ID has more than one subscriptions key, as is the case for Service
Bus subscriptions the Azure SubscriptionID field was overwritten by the second
value.
TF_ACC= go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -run TestParseAzureResourceID -timeout=30s -parallel=4
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 0.060s
Fixes#9108
When an aws_route53_record alias is created with terraform and then
modified via cli or console, terraform wasn't picking up the changes. I
had the following config:
```
resource "aws_route53_record" "alias" {
zone_id = "${aws_route53_zone.main.zone_id}"
name = "www"
type = "A"
alias {
zone_id = "${aws_elb.main.zone_id}"
name = "${aws_elb.main.dns_name}"
evaluate_target_health = true
}
}
```
I changed the evaluate_health_target on the AWS console and terraform plan showed me this:
```
% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_route53_zone.main: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X)
aws_elb.main: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar-terraform-elb-1111)
aws_route53_record.alias: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X_www_A)
No changes. Infrastructure is up-to-date. This means that Terraform
could not detect any differences between your configuration and
the real physical resources that exist. As a result, Terraform
doesn't need to do anything.
```
When rebuilding the provider with the changes in the PR, a terraform plan then looks as follows:
```
% terraform plan
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-azurerm overrides an internal plugin for azurerm-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_route53_zone.main: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X)
aws_elb.main: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar-terraform-elb-1111)
aws_route53_record.alias: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X_www_A)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
~ aws_route53_record.alias
alias.1050468691.evaluate_target_health: "" => "true"
alias.1050468691.name: "" => "foobar-terraform-elb-1111-522021794.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com"
alias.1050468691.zone_id: "" => "Z1H1FL5HABSF5"
alias.2906616344.evaluate_target_health: "false" => "false"
alias.2906616344.name: "foobar-terraform-elb-1111-522021794.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com." => ""
alias.2906616344.zone_id: "Z1H1FL5HABSF5" => ""
Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
the apply then changed the target back to true
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/29 18:17:23 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic (120.63s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn (131.81s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport (128.40s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport (120.06s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix (114.02s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard (165.54s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover (118.10s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic (128.10s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias (132.62s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias (132.12s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias (237.92s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic (121.95s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic (123.40s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange (198.24s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty (119.68s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws2092.597s
```
Initial tests were failing as follows:
```
=== RUN TestAccAWSElasticacheCluster_importBasic
--- FAIL: TestAccAWSElasticacheCluster_importBasic (362.66s)
testing.go:265: Step 1 error: ImportStateVerify attributes not
equivalent. Difference is shown below. Top is actual, bottom is
expected.
(map[string]string) {
}
(map[string]string) (len=2) {
(string) (len=20) "parameter_group_name": (string) (len=20)
"default.memcached1.4",
(string) (len=22) "security_group_names.#":
(string) (len=1) "0"
}
FAIL
exit status 1
```
The import of ElastiCache clusters helped to point out 3 things:
1. Currently, we were trying to set the parameter_group_name as follows:
```
d.Set("parameter_group_name", c.CacheParameterGroup)
```
Unfortunately, c.CacheParameterGroup is a struct not a string. This was
causing the test import failure. So this had to be replaced as follows:
```
if c.CacheParameterGroup != nil {
d.Set("parameter_group_name", c.CacheParameterGroup.CacheParameterGroupName)
}
```
2. We were trying to set the security_group_names as follows:
```
d.Set("security_group_names", c.CacheSecurityGroups)
```
The CacheSecurityGroups was actually a []* so had to be changed to work
as follows:
```
if len(c.CacheSecurityGroups) > 0 {
d.Set("security_group_names",
flattenElastiCacheSecurityGroupNames(c.CacheSecurityGroups))
}
```
3. We were trying to set the security_group_ids as follows:
```
d.Set("security_group_ids", c.SecurityGroups)
```
This is another []* and needs to be changed as follows:
```
if len(c.SecurityGroups) > 0 {
d.Set("security_group_ids",
flattenElastiCacheSecurityGroupIds(c.SecurityGroups))
}
```
This then allows the import test to pass as expected:
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSElasticacheCluster_importBasic'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/23 10:59:01 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSElasticacheCluster_importBasic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSElasticacheCluster_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSElasticacheCluster_importBasic (351.96s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 351.981s
```
As a final test, I ran the basic ElastiCache cluster creation to make
sure all passed as expected:
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSElasticacheCluster_basic'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/23 11:05:51 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSElasticacheCluster_basic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSElasticacheCluster_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSElasticacheCluster_basic (809.25s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 809.267s
```
Fixes#8597
There was sometimes an issue where Terraform was deleting the ECR
repository from the statefile before the reposity was actually deleted.
Added retry logic for Terraform to wait for the repository to be deleted
before proceeding with the statefile update
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEcrRepository_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/26 12:46:57 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSEcrRepository_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEcrRepository_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEcrRepository_importBasic (17.86s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSEcrRepository_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEcrRepository_basic (16.40s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 34.288s
```
aws_elasticache_replication_group caused a panic
Fixes#9097
The update for `parameter_group_name` was trying to find the incorrect
value to set `cache_parameter_group_name` - this is what was causing the
panic
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSElasticacheReplicationGroup_updateParameterGroup'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/28 11:17:30 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSElasticacheReplicationGroup_updateParameterGroup -timeout
120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSElasticacheReplicationGroup_updateParameterGroup
--- PASS: TestAccAWSElasticacheReplicationGroup_updateParameterGroup
(903.90s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws903.931s
```
Colin Saliceti