The plan file should contain all data required to execute the apply
operation. Validation requires interpolation, and the `file()`
interpolation function may fail if the module files are not present.
This is the case currently with how TFE executes plans.
The `-force-copy` option will suppress confirmation for copying state
data.
Modify some tests to use the option, making sure to leave coverage of
the Input code path.
Fixes#12806
This should've been part of 2c19aa69d9
This is the same issue, just missed a spot. Tests are hard to cover for
this since we're removing the legacy backends one by one, eventually
it'll be gone. A good sign is that we don't import backendlegacy at all
anymore in command/
This augments backend-config to also accept key=value pairs.
This should make Terraform easier to script rather than having to
generate a JSON file.
You must still specify the backend type as a minimal amount in
configurations, example:
```
terraform { backend "consul" {} }
```
This is required because Terraform needs to be able to detect the
_absense_ of that value for unsetting, if that is necessary at some
point.
Plans were properly encoding backend configuration but the apply was
reading it from the wrong field. :( This meant that every apply from a
plan was applying it locally with backends.
This needs to get released ASAP.
Fixes#12749
If we merge in an extra partial config we need to recompute the hash to
compare with the old value to detect that change.
This hash needs to NOT be stored and just used as a temporary. We want
to keep the original hash in the state so that we don't detect a change
from the config (since the config will always be partial).
Add Env and SetEnv methods to command.Meta to retrieve the current
environment name inside any command.
Make sure all calls to Backend.State contain an environment name, and
make the package compile against the update backend package.
I made this interface way back with the original backend work and I
guess I forgot to hook it up! This is becoming an issue as I'm working
on our 2nd enhanced backend that requires this information and I
realized it was hardcoded before.
This propertly uses the CLIInit interface allowing any backend to gain
access to this data.
During backend initialization, especially during a migration, there is a
chance that an existing state could be overwritten.
Attempt to get a locks when writing the new state. It would be nice to
always have a lock when reading the states, but the recursive structure
of the Meta.Backend config functions makes that quite complex.
James Bardin