Adds support for `name_prefix` to the `aws_autoscaling_group` and `aws_elb` resources. Unfortunately when using `name_prefix` with `aws_elb`, this means that the specified prefix can only be a maximum of 6 characters in length. This is because the maximum length for an ELB name is 32 characters, and `resource.PrefixedUniqueId` generates a 26-character unique identifier. I was considering truncating the unique identifier to allow for a longer `name_prefix`, but I worried that doing so would increase the risk of collisions.
This will make it possible/easier to make decisions based on supported EC2 platforms (VPC and/or EC2 Classic)
in the context of any AWS resource which needs make such decisions.
Fixes: #12752
Weight was replaced with weighted_routing_policy in June 2016. But for
some reason we were still doing the following in the Read func:
```
d.Set("weight", -1)
```
As this field was removed, we shouldn't be setting it to state
Adds plan-level validation for both IPv4 and IPv6 CIDR Blocks in an AWS SecurityGroup resource, as well as the AWS Security Group Rule resource.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSecurityGroup_invalidCIDRBlock'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/16 11:32:54 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSSecurityGroup_invalidCIDRBlock -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSecurityGroup_invalidCIDRBlock
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSecurityGroup_invalidCIDRBlock (0.01s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 0.017s
```
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSSecurityGroupRule_ExpectInvalidCIDR'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/16 11:46:21 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSSecurityGroupRule_ExpectInvalidCIDR -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSSecurityGroupRule_ExpectInvalidCIDR
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSecurityGroupRule_ExpectInvalidCIDR (0.01s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 0.016s
```
Previously the check for if we are setting `CidrBlock` or `IPv6CidrBlock` during an `Update` of the `aws_network_acl` resource would populate the input struct with a nil string value `""`. This caused our acceptance tests to fail, and broke the resource's functionality if a user only set `CidrBlock` or `IPv6CidrBlock` for either an `ingress` or `egress` rule as the API would error out with an `Invalid CidrBlock` error.
Previously:
```
aws_network_acl.bond: Error creating egress entry: InvalidParameterValue: CIDR block is malformed
status code: 400, request id: 0620e0b7-4e30-4c14-9a7a-5d373cc9f33b
```
Currently:
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSNetworkAcl'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/15 15:41:17 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSNetworkAcl -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_importBasic (26.96s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAclRule_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAclRule_basic (23.08s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAclRule_ipv6
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAclRule_ipv6 (26.24s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_EgressAndIngressRules
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_EgressAndIngressRules (25.11s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyIngressRules_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyIngressRules_basic (31.82s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyIngressRules_update
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyIngressRules_update (48.59s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyEgressRules
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyEgressRules (25.48s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_SubnetChange
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_SubnetChange (57.12s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_Subnets
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_Subnets (67.55s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_ipv6Rules
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_ipv6Rules (31.52s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_espProtocol
acc--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_espProtocol (24.37s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 387.855s
```
Fixes: #11824
A full set of acceptance tests for *all* OpsWorks tests are below. There is a single issue, opsworks_instance isn't ordering the layer_ids so it's non-deterministic which can come back. This introduces a false positive.
The opsworks tests are running both against us-east-1 for some and us-west-2 for others. This must be marked as a backwards incompatibility in 0.9 just incase people are using the opsworks region parameter to try and override the provider region
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication' 2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:11:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication (164.29s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 164.319s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:16:18 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayerImportBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayerImportBasic (105.98s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer (92.68s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 198.684s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:23:28 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission (226.36s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 226.386s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:28:01 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer (129.39s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 129.426s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:37:46 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile (42.60s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 42.624s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksStack' 2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 18:00:50 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksStack -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksStackImportBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackImportBasic (50.28s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksStackNoVpc
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackNoVpc (25.92s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksStackVpc
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackVpc (76.80s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 153.025s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:38:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance (916.15s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 916.177s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance' 2 ↵
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:26:45 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance_importBasic (85.52s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance
--- FAIL: TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance (114.09s)
testing.go:268: Step 1 error: After applying this step, the plan was not empty:
DIFF:
UPDATE: aws_opsworks_instance.tf-acc
layer_ids.0: "4c29b76f-df72-409e-a5c4-9459b7d9b4a4" => "a4a859cf-2a07-447e-a151-a97a6d827db7"
layer_ids.1: "a4a859cf-2a07-447e-a151-a97a6d827db7" => "4c29b76f-df72-409e-a5c4-9459b7d9b4a4"
FAIL
exit status 1
FAIL github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 199.643s
make: *** [testacc] Error 1
```
Fixes the two failing aws_ami acceptance tests, by polling until the AMI is deleted before exiting.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSAMI_basic'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 16:03:26 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSAMI_basic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSAMI_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAMI_basic (43.98s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 43.989s
```
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSAMI_snapshotSize'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 16:07:29 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSAMI_snapshotSize -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSAMI_snapshotSize
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAMI_snapshotSize (28.64s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 28.654s
```
If the user_arn changes on the user_profile resource we should delete it and recreate it
instead of attempting to modify it incorrectly and causing the terraform apply to fail.
I also added an acceptance test that will trigger this case.
Fixes: #12599
Before this patch:
```
% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_saml_provider.salesforce: Refreshing state... (ID: arn:aws:i...rce-test)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_iam_saml_provider.salesforce: aws_iam_saml_provider.salesforce: NoSuchEntity: Manifest not found for arn arn:aws:iam::187416307283:saml-provider/tf-salesforce-test
status code: 404, request id: fc32c7f8-0631-11e7-8e1f-29a8c10edf64
```
After this patch:
```
% terraform plan ✚ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_saml_provider.salesforce: Refreshing state... (ID: arn:aws:i...rce-test)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_iam_saml_provider.salesforce
arn: "<computed>"
name: "tf-salesforce-test"
```
Gauthier Wallet