* provider/openstack: Redesign openstack_blockstorage_volume_attach_v2
The current design of openstack_blockstorage_volume_attach_v2 does
not correctly implement the Block Storage API attachment call. It
was only partially implemented, only marking volumes as being
attached, while never actually attaching them.
This redesign is a closer alignment to how creating attachments
to a standalone Block Storage service works.
For creating attachments specifically in the case of OpenStack
Compute instances, the openstack_compute_volume_attach_v2 resource
is required.
* provider/openstack: re-adding instance_id for backwards compatibility
This commit adds the openstack_compute_floatingip_associate_v2
resource which specifically handles associating a floating IP
address to an instance. This can be used instead of the existing
floating_ip options in the openstack_compute_instance_v2 resource.
* Replace DNSimple API client with the official Go client
* Upgrade DNSimple provider to use the new API v2
Acceptance tests pass:
```
=== RUN TestProvider
--- PASS: TestProvider (0.00s)
=== RUN TestProvider_impl
--- PASS: TestProvider_impl (0.00s)
=== RUN TestAccDNSimpleRecord_Basic
--- PASS: TestAccDNSimpleRecord_Basic (2.67s)
=== RUN TestAccDNSimpleRecord_Updated
--- PASS: TestAccDNSimpleRecord_Updated (1.88s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/dnsimple
```
Note that the code still has to be updated to pass the account ID
dynamically in place of "TODO-ACCOUNT".
* Refactor DNSimple provider to expose both client and config
The config is required as the new API wants to know the identifier of
the account you are operating to. The account is not stored in the
client (as the client can talk with different accounts), hence I need
to pass it as part of the config.
* Identify Terraform requests to DNSimple via UserAgent
* Upgrade to the latest dnsimple-go version
* Update docs
Provide upgrade instructions and update the docs for API v2.
* Remove rendundant type declaration
Fixes:#11750
Before this change, adding a log_subscription_filter and then deleting
it manually would yield this error on terraform plan/apply:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_role.iam_for_lambda: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123)
aws_cloudwatch_log_group.logs: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name)
aws_iam_role_policy.test_lambdafunction_iam_policy: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123:test_lambdafunction_iam_policy)
aws_lambda_function.test_lambdafunction: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name_example123)
aws_lambda_permission.allow_cloudwatch_logs: Refreshing state... (ID: AllowExecutionFromCloudWatchLogs)
aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Refreshing state... (ID: cwlsf-992677504)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Subscription filter for log group example_lambda_name with name prefix test_lambdafunction_logfilter not found!
```
After this patch, we get the following behaviour:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_role.iam_for_lambda: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123)
aws_cloudwatch_log_group.logs: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name)
aws_lambda_function.test_lambdafunction: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name_example123)
aws_iam_role_policy.test_lambdafunction_iam_policy: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123:test_lambdafunction_iam_policy)
aws_lambda_permission.allow_cloudwatch_logs: Refreshing state... (ID: AllowExecutionFromCloudWatchLogs)
aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Refreshing state... (ID: cwlsf-992677504)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter
destination_arn: "arn:aws:lambda:us-west-2:187416307283:function:example_lambda_name_example123"
filter_pattern: "logtype test"
log_group_name: "example_lambda_name"
name: "test_lambdafunction_logfilter"
role_arn: "<computed>"
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
Fixes: #12232
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags (39.51s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 39.537s
```
A couple interpolation tests were using invalid state that didn't match
the config. These will still pass but were flushed out by an attempt to
make this an error. The repl however still required interpolation
without a config, and tests there will provide a indication if this
behavior changes.
It turns out that a few use cases depend on not finding a resource
without an error.
The other code paths had sufficient nil checks for this, but there was
one place where we called Count() that needed to be checked. If the
existence of the resource matters, it would be caught at a higher level
and still return an "unknown resource" error to the user.
Joe Topjian