Previously the check for if we are setting `CidrBlock` or `IPv6CidrBlock` during an `Update` of the `aws_network_acl` resource would populate the input struct with a nil string value `""`. This caused our acceptance tests to fail, and broke the resource's functionality if a user only set `CidrBlock` or `IPv6CidrBlock` for either an `ingress` or `egress` rule as the API would error out with an `Invalid CidrBlock` error.
Previously:
```
aws_network_acl.bond: Error creating egress entry: InvalidParameterValue: CIDR block is malformed
status code: 400, request id: 0620e0b7-4e30-4c14-9a7a-5d373cc9f33b
```
Currently:
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSNetworkAcl'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/15 15:41:17 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSNetworkAcl -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_importBasic (26.96s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAclRule_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAclRule_basic (23.08s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAclRule_ipv6
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAclRule_ipv6 (26.24s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_EgressAndIngressRules
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_EgressAndIngressRules (25.11s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyIngressRules_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyIngressRules_basic (31.82s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyIngressRules_update
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyIngressRules_update (48.59s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyEgressRules
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_OnlyEgressRules (25.48s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_SubnetChange
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_SubnetChange (57.12s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_Subnets
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_Subnets (67.55s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_ipv6Rules
--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_ipv6Rules (31.52s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_espProtocol
acc--- PASS: TestAccAWSNetworkAcl_espProtocol (24.37s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 387.855s
```
Fixes: #11824
A full set of acceptance tests for *all* OpsWorks tests are below. There is a single issue, opsworks_instance isn't ordering the layer_ids so it's non-deterministic which can come back. This introduces a false positive.
The opsworks tests are running both against us-east-1 for some and us-west-2 for others. This must be marked as a backwards incompatibility in 0.9 just incase people are using the opsworks region parameter to try and override the provider region
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication' 2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:11:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksApplication (164.29s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 164.319s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:16:18 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayerImportBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayerImportBasic (105.98s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksCustomLayer (92.68s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 198.684s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:23:28 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksPermission (226.36s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 226.386s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:28:01 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksRailsAppLayer (129.39s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 129.426s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:37:46 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksUserProfile (42.60s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 42.624s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksStack' 2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 18:00:50 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksStack -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksStackImportBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackImportBasic (50.28s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksStackNoVpc
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackNoVpc (25.92s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksStackVpc
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksStackVpc (76.80s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 153.025s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance' ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:38:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksRdsDbInstance (916.15s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 916.177s
```
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance' 2 ↵
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 17:26:45 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance_importBasic (85.52s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance
--- FAIL: TestAccAWSOpsworksInstance (114.09s)
testing.go:268: Step 1 error: After applying this step, the plan was not empty:
DIFF:
UPDATE: aws_opsworks_instance.tf-acc
layer_ids.0: "4c29b76f-df72-409e-a5c4-9459b7d9b4a4" => "a4a859cf-2a07-447e-a151-a97a6d827db7"
layer_ids.1: "a4a859cf-2a07-447e-a151-a97a6d827db7" => "4c29b76f-df72-409e-a5c4-9459b7d9b4a4"
FAIL
exit status 1
FAIL github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 199.643s
make: *** [testacc] Error 1
```
Fixes the two failing aws_ami acceptance tests, by polling until the AMI is deleted before exiting.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSAMI_basic'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 16:03:26 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSAMI_basic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSAMI_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAMI_basic (43.98s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 43.989s
```
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSAMI_snapshotSize'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/14 16:07:29 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSAMI_snapshotSize -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSAMI_snapshotSize
--- PASS: TestAccAWSAMI_snapshotSize (28.64s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 28.654s
```
If the user_arn changes on the user_profile resource we should delete it and recreate it
instead of attempting to modify it incorrectly and causing the terraform apply to fail.
I also added an acceptance test that will trigger this case.
Fixes: #12599
Before this patch:
```
% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_saml_provider.salesforce: Refreshing state... (ID: arn:aws:i...rce-test)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_iam_saml_provider.salesforce: aws_iam_saml_provider.salesforce: NoSuchEntity: Manifest not found for arn arn:aws:iam::187416307283:saml-provider/tf-salesforce-test
status code: 404, request id: fc32c7f8-0631-11e7-8e1f-29a8c10edf64
```
After this patch:
```
% terraform plan ✚ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_saml_provider.salesforce: Refreshing state... (ID: arn:aws:i...rce-test)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_iam_saml_provider.salesforce
arn: "<computed>"
name: "tf-salesforce-test"
```
helper/schema: Rename Timeout resource block to Timeouts
- Pluralize configuration argument name to better represent that there is
one block for many timeouts
- use a const for the configuration timeouts key
- update docs
Fixes: #12506
When a replication_task cdc_start_time was specified as an int, it was
causing a panic as the conversion to a Unix timestampe was expecting a
string
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAwsDmsReplicationTaskBasic'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/08 22:55:29 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAwsDmsReplicationTaskBasic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAwsDmsReplicationTaskBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAwsDmsReplicationTaskBasic (1089.77s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 1089.802s
```
Fixes: #7492
When we use the same IP Address, BGP ASN and VPN Type as an existing
aws_customer_gateway, terraform will take control of that gateway (not
import it!) and try and modify it. This could be very bad
There is a warning on the AWS documentation that one gateway of the same
parameters can be created, Terraform is now going to error if a gateway
of the same parameters is attempted to be created
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSCustomerGateway_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/03/07 18:40:39 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSCustomerGateway_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSCustomerGateway_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCustomerGateway_importBasic (31.11s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSCustomerGateway_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCustomerGateway_basic (68.72s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSCustomerGateway_similarAlreadyExists
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCustomerGateway_similarAlreadyExists (35.18s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSCustomerGateway_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSCustomerGateway_disappears (25.13s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 160.172s
```
This covers the scenario of an instance created by a spot request. Using
Terraform we only know the spot request is fulfilled but the instance can
still be pending which causes the attachment to fail.
* Ensures elb exists before negotiation policy check; Fixes#11260
* Adds acceptance test case for missing elb
* Adds back https properties for test elb
In the event that an unexpected state is returned from
`environmentStateRefreshFunc` errors in the Elastic Beanstalk console
will not be returned to the user.
* helper/schema: Add custom Timeout block for resources
* refactor DefaultTimeout to suuport multiple types. Load meta in Refresh from Instance State
* update vpc but it probably wont last anyway
* refactor test into table test for more cases
* rename constant keys
* refactor configdecode
* remove VPC demo
* remove comments
* remove more comments
* refactor some
* rename timeKeys to timeoutKeys
* remove note
* documentation/resources: Document the Timeout block
* document timeouts
* have a test case that covers 'hours'
* restore a System default timeout of 20 minutes, instead of 0
* restore system default timeout of 20 minutes, refactor tests, add test method to handle system default
* rename timeout key constants
* test applying timeout to state
* refactor test
* Add resource Diff test
* clarify docs
* update to use constants
Fixes:#11750
Before this change, adding a log_subscription_filter and then deleting
it manually would yield this error on terraform plan/apply:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_role.iam_for_lambda: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123)
aws_cloudwatch_log_group.logs: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name)
aws_iam_role_policy.test_lambdafunction_iam_policy: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123:test_lambdafunction_iam_policy)
aws_lambda_function.test_lambdafunction: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name_example123)
aws_lambda_permission.allow_cloudwatch_logs: Refreshing state... (ID: AllowExecutionFromCloudWatchLogs)
aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Refreshing state... (ID: cwlsf-992677504)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Subscription filter for log group example_lambda_name with name prefix test_lambdafunction_logfilter not found!
```
After this patch, we get the following behaviour:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_iam_role.iam_for_lambda: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123)
aws_cloudwatch_log_group.logs: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name)
aws_lambda_function.test_lambdafunction: Refreshing state... (ID: example_lambda_name_example123)
aws_iam_role_policy.test_lambdafunction_iam_policy: Refreshing state... (ID: test_lambdafuntion_iam_role_example123:test_lambdafunction_iam_policy)
aws_lambda_permission.allow_cloudwatch_logs: Refreshing state... (ID: AllowExecutionFromCloudWatchLogs)
aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter: Refreshing state... (ID: cwlsf-992677504)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_cloudwatch_log_subscription_filter.test_lambdafunction_logfilter
destination_arn: "arn:aws:lambda:us-west-2:187416307283:function:example_lambda_name_example123"
filter_pattern: "logtype test"
log_group_name: "example_lambda_name"
name: "test_lambdafunction_logfilter"
role_arn: "<computed>"
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
Fixes: #12232
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSFileSystem_pagedTags (39.51s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 39.537s
```
not found
Fixes: #12279
When manually deleting an autoscaling_group from the console, a
terraform plan would look as follows:
```
% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_launch_configuration.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test-0096cf26c7eebdc9fcb5bd1837)
aws_autoscaling_group.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test)
aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Error retrieving Autoscaling Scheduled Actions: ValidationError: Group test not found
status code: 400, request id: 093e9ed5-fe01-11e6-b990-1f64334b3a10
```
After this patch:
```
% terraform plan ✹ ✭
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_launch_configuration.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test-0096cf26c7eebdc9fcb5bd1837)
aws_autoscaling_group.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: test)
aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_autoscaling_group.foobar
arn: "<computed>"
availability_zones.#: "1"
availability_zones.2487133097: "us-west-2a"
default_cooldown: "<computed>"
desired_capacity: "<computed>"
force_delete: "true"
health_check_grace_period: "300"
health_check_type: "ELB"
launch_configuration: "test-0096cf26c7eebdc9fcb5bd1837"
load_balancers.#: "<computed>"
max_size: "1"
metrics_granularity: "1Minute"
min_size: "1"
name: "test"
protect_from_scale_in: "false"
tag.#: "1"
tag.157008572.key: "Foo"
tag.157008572.propagate_at_launch: "true"
tag.157008572.value: "foo-bar"
termination_policies.#: "1"
termination_policies.0: "OldestInstance"
vpc_zone_identifier.#: "<computed>"
wait_for_capacity_timeout: "10m"
+ aws_autoscaling_schedule.foobar
arn: "<computed>"
autoscaling_group_name: "test"
desired_capacity: "0"
end_time: "2017-12-12T06:00:00Z"
max_size: "1"
min_size: "0"
recurrence: "<computed>"
scheduled_action_name: "foobar"
start_time: "2017-12-11T18:00:00Z"
Plan: 2 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
Fixes: #12205
You cannot use an index of an empty slide therefore, we got a panic as follows:
```
aws_ssm_association.foo: Creating...
instance_id: "" => "i-002f3898dc95350e7"
name: "" => "test_document_association-%s"
parameters.%: "" => "2"
parameters.directoryId: "" => "d-926720980b"
parameters.directoryName: "" => "corp.mydomain.com"
Error applying plan:
1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_ssm_association.foo: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_ssm_association.foo: unexpected EOF
Terraform does not automatically rollback in the face of errors.
Instead, your Terraform state file has been partially updated with
any resources that successfully completed. Please address the error
above and apply again to incrementally change your infrastructure.
panic: runtime error: index out of range
2017/02/23 21:41:45 [DEBUG] plugin: terraform-provider-aws:
2017/02/23 21:41:45 [DEBUG] plugin: terraform-provider-aws: goroutine 1419 [running]:
2017/02/23 21:41:45 [DEBUG] plugin: terraform-provider-aws: panic(0x1567480, 0xc42000c110)
2017/02/23 21:41:45 [DEBUG] plugin: terraform-provider-aws: /usr/local/Cellar/go/1.7.4_1/libexec/src/runtime/panic.go:500 +0x1a1
```
This feature allows sending a notification to either an SQS queue or an
SNS topic when an error occurs running an AWS Lambda function.
This fixes#10630.
* provider/aws: New resource codepipeline
* Vendor aws/codepipeline
* Add tests
* Add docs
* Bump codepipeline to v1.6.25
* Adjustments based on feedback
* Force new resource on ID change
* Improve tests
* Switch update to read
Since we don't require a second pass, only do a read.
* Skip tests if GITHUB_TOKEN is not set
* Added new resource aws_elastic_beanstalk_application_version.
* Changing bucket and key to required.
* Update to use d.Id() directly in DescribeApplicationVersions.
* Checking err to make sure that the application version is successfully deleted.
* Update `version_label` to `Computed: true`.
* provider/aws: Updating to python solution stack
* provider/aws: Beanstalk App Version delete source
The Elastic Beanstalk API call to delete `application_version` resource
should not delete the s3 bundle, as this object is managed by another
Terraform resource
* provider/aws: Update application version docs
* Fix application version test
* Add `version_label` update test
Adds test that fails after rebasing branch onto v0.8.x. `version_label`
changes do not update the `aws_elastic_beanstalk_environment` resource.
* `version_label` changes to update environment
* Prevent unintended delete of `application_version`
Prevents an `application_version` used by multiple environments from
being deleted.
* Add `force_delete` attribute
* Update documentation
Jake Champlin