Commit Graph

29 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
James Bardin 6d33de8a9d fixup analysis calls from rebase 2022-03-04 15:51:36 -05:00
Martin Atkins 2e6b6e9a6b go.mod: go get google.golang.org/protobuf@v1.27.1 2021-10-11 16:37:39 -07:00
James Bardin aece887a85
Merge pull request #29701 from hashicorp/jbardin/proposed-new-null-objs
objchange: fix ProposedNew from null objects
2021-10-05 13:09:49 -04:00
James Bardin 58d85fcc2e add test for planing unknown data source values 2021-10-05 12:31:23 -04:00
James Bardin 18d354223e objchange: fix ProposedNew from null objects
The codepath for AllAttributesNull was not correct for any nested object
types with collections, and should create single null values for the
correct NestingMode rather than a single object with null attributes.

Since there is no reason to descend into nested object types to create
nullv alues, we can drop the AllAttributesNull function altogether and
create null values as needed during ProposedNew.

The corresponding AllBlockAttributesNull was only called internally in 1
location, and simply delegated to schema.EmptyValue. We can reduce the
package surface area by dropping that function too and calling
EmptyValue directly.
2021-10-04 15:03:25 -04:00
Martin Atkins 702413702c plans/planfile: Include dependency locks in saved plan files
We recently removed the legacy way we used to track the SHA256 hashes of
individual provider executables as part of a plans.Plan, because these
days we want to track the checksums of entire provider packages rather
than just the executable.

In order to achieve that new goal, we can save a copy of the dependency
lock information inside the plan file. This follows our existing precedent
of using exactly the same serialization formats we'd normally use for
this information, and thus we can reuse the existing models and
serializers and be confident we won't lose any detail in the round-trip.

As of this commit there's not yet anything actually making use of this
mechanism. In a subsequent commit we'll teach the main callers that write
and read plan files to include and expect (respectively) dependency
information, verifying that the available providers still match by the
time we're applying the plan.
2021-10-01 14:43:58 -07:00
Martin Atkins 6a98e4720c plans/planfile: Create takes most arguments via a struct type
Previously the planfile.Create function had accumulated probably already
too many positional arguments, and I'm intending to add another one in
a subsequent commit and so this is preparation to make the callsites more
readable (subjectively) and make it clearer how we can extend this
function's arguments to include further components in a plan file.

There's no difference in observable functionality here. This is just
passing the same set of arguments in a slightly different way.
2021-10-01 14:43:58 -07:00
Martin Atkins 8d193ad268 core: Simplify and centralize plugin availability checks
Historically the responsibility for making sure that all of the available
providers are of suitable versions and match the appropriate checksums has
been split rather inexplicably over multiple different layers, with some
of the checks happening as late as creating a terraform.Context.

We're gradually iterating towards making that all be handled in one place,
but in this step we're just cleaning up some old remnants from the
main "terraform" package, which is now no longer responsible for any
version or checksum verification and instead just assumes it's been
provided with suitable factory functions by its caller.

We do still have a pre-check here to make sure that we at least have a
factory function for each plugin the configuration seems to depend on,
because if we don't do that up front then it ends up getting caught
instead deep inside the Terraform runtime, often inside a concurrent
graph walk and thus it's not deterministic which codepath will happen to
catch it on a particular run.

As of this commit, this actually does leave some holes in our checks: the
command package is using the dependency lock file to make sure we have
exactly the provider packages we expect (exact versions and checksums),
which is the most crucial part, but we don't yet have any spot where
we make sure that the lock file is consistent with the current
configuration, and we are no longer preserving the provider checksums as
part of a saved plan.

Both of those will come in subsequent commits. While it's unusual to have
a series of commits that briefly subtracts functionality and then adds
back in equivalent functionality later, the lock file checking is the only
part that's crucial for security reasons, with everything else mainly just
being to give better feedback when folks seem to be using Terraform
incorrectly. The other bits are therefore mostly cosmetic and okay to be
absent briefly as we work towards a better design that is clearer about
where that responsibility belongs.
2021-10-01 14:43:58 -07:00
Martin Atkins a1a713cf28 core: Report ActionReasons when we plan to delete "orphans"
There are a few different reasons why a resource instance tracked in the
prior state might be considered an "orphan", but previously we reported
them all identically in the planned changes.

In order to help users understand the reason for a surprising planned
delete, we'll now try to specify an additional reason for the planned
deletion, covering all of the main reasons why that could happen.

This commit only introduces the new detail to the plans.Changes result,
though it also incidentally exposes it as part of the JSON plan result
in order to keep that working without returning errors in these new
cases. We'll expose this information in the human-oriented UI output in
a subsequent commit.
2021-09-23 14:37:08 -07:00
Alisdair McDiarmid c4688345a1 plans: Add resource drift to the plan file format 2021-09-16 15:22:37 -04:00
Alisdair McDiarmid bebf1ad23a core: Compute resource drift after plan walk
Rather than delaying resource drift detection until it is ready to be
presented, here we perform that computation after the plan walk has
completed. The resulting drift is represented like planned resource
changes, using a slice of ResourceInstanceChangeSrc values.
2021-09-16 15:22:37 -04:00
James Bardin 331dc8b14c handle empty containers in ProposedNew NestedTypes
Empty containers of NestedTypes were not handled in ProposedNew, causing
plans to be submitted with null values where there was configuration
present.
2021-09-15 08:33:25 -04:00
James Bardin 8ed9a270e5
Merge pull request #29559 from hashicorp/jbardin/optional-attrs
Prevent `ObjectWithOptionalAttrs` from escaping
2021-09-13 08:58:11 -04:00
James Bardin 43123d284e optional attrs should not be in ProposedNew 2021-09-13 08:51:32 -04:00
James Bardin 782132da33 remove incorrect computed check
The config is already validated, and does not need to be checked in
AssertPlanValid. Add some more coverage for plan validation.
2021-09-10 14:44:07 -04:00
Alisdair McDiarmid 29999c1d6f command: Render "moved" annotations in plan UI
For resources which are planned to move, render the previous run address
as additional information in the plan UI. For the case of a move-only
resource (which otherwise is unchanged), we also render that as a
planned change, but without any corresponding action symbol.

If all changes in the plan are moves without changes, the plan is no
longer considered "empty". In this case, we skip rendering the action
symbols in the UI.
2021-09-03 17:44:07 -04:00
James Bardin 7c02ef6220
Merge pull request #29482 from hashicorp/jbardin/computed-obj-attrs
Computed values within nested object types in `AssertPlanValid`
2021-08-31 11:26:52 -04:00
James Bardin f195ce7fd4 remove temp test 2021-08-31 11:17:32 -04:00
Martin Atkins 22b36d1f4c Field for the previous address of each resource instance in the plan
In order to expose the effect of any relevant "moved" statements we dealt
with prior to creating the plan, we'll record with each
ResourceInstanceChange both is current address and the address it was
tracked at for the previous run.

To save consumers of these objects from having to special-case the
situation where there _was_ no previous run (e.g. because this is a Create
change), we'll just pretend the previous run address was the same as the
current address in that case, the same as for an update without any
renaming in effect.

This includes a breaking change to the plan file format, but one that
doesn't require a version number increment because there is no ambiguity
between the two formats and so mismatched parsers will already fail with
an error message.

As of this commit we've just added the new field but not yet populated it
with any useful information: it always just matches Addr. A future commit
will wire this up to the result of applying the moves so that we can
populate it correctly. We also don't yet expose this new information
anywhere in the UI layer.
2021-08-30 13:59:14 -07:00
James Bardin ea68d79ea2 nested object values can be computed
While blocks were not allowed to be computed by the provider, nested
objects can be. Remove the errors regarding blocks and verify unknown
values are valid.
2021-08-30 14:30:07 -04:00
James Bardin 903797084a objects vs maps in nested object types
When using NestedMap objects, unify the codepath for both maps and
objects as they may be interchangeable.
2021-08-30 14:30:02 -04:00
James Bardin 7ca6be8285 correctly verify planned nested object values
The validation for nested object types with computed attributes was
using the incorrect function call.
2021-08-30 14:29:15 -04:00
Martin Atkins ce96d82de0 build: Centralize our protobuf compilation steps
We have a few different .proto files in this repository that all need to
get recompiled into .pb.go files each time we change them, but we were
previously handling that with some scripts that just assumed that protoc
and the relevant plugins were already installed on the system somewhere,
at the right versions.

In practice we've been constantly flopping between different versions of
these tools due to folks having different versions installed in their
development environments. In particular, the state of the .pb.go files
in the prior commit wasn't reproducible by any single version of the tools
because they've all slightly diverged from one another.

In the interests of being more consistent here and avoiding accidental
inconsistencies, we'll now centralize the protocol buffer compile steps
all into a single tool that knows how to fetch and install the expected
versions of the various tools we need and then run those tools with the
right options to get a stable result.

If we want to upgrade to either a newer protoc or a newer protoc-gen-go
in future then we'll do that in a central location and update all of the
.pb.go files at the same time, so that we're always consistently tracking
the same version of protocol buffers everywhere.

While doing this I attempted to keep as close as possible to the toolchain
we'd most recently used, but since they were not consistent with each
other they've now all changed which version numbers they record at minimum,
and the planproto stub in particular now also has a slightly different
descriptor serialization but is otherwise offering the same API.
2021-08-20 16:18:48 -07:00
James Bardin da007517b0 handle null NestingSingle values
Null NestingSingle attributes were not being handled in ProposedNew
2021-08-18 13:52:18 -04:00
Kristin Laemmert 0d80a74539
configs/configschema: fix missing "computed" attributes from NestedObject's ImpliedType (#29172)
* configs/configschema: fix missing "computed" attributes from NestedObject's ImpliedType

listOptionalAttrsFromObject was not including "computed" attributes in the list of optional object attributes. This is now fixed. I've also added some tests and fixed some panics and otherwise bad behavior when bad input is given. One natable change is in ImpliedType, which was panicking on an invalid nesting mode. The comment expressly states that it will return a result even when the schema is inconsistent, so I removed the panic and instead return an empty object.
2021-07-15 13:00:07 -04:00
James Bardin d9dfd451ea update to use typed sensitive marks 2021-06-25 12:49:07 -04:00
James Bardin b7f8ef4dc6 handle unexpected changes to unknown block
An unknown block represents a dynamic configuration block with an
unknown for_each value. We were not catching the case where a provider
modified this value unexpectedly, which would crash with block of type
NestingList blocks where the config value has no length for comparison.
2021-06-11 13:13:40 -04:00
Martin Atkins f40800b3a4 Move states/ to internal/states/
This is part of a general effort to move all of Terraform's non-library
package surface under internal in order to reinforce that these are for
internal use within Terraform only.

If you were previously importing packages under this prefix into an
external codebase, you could pin to an earlier release tag as an interim
solution until you've make a plan to achieve the same functionality some
other way.
2021-05-17 14:09:07 -07:00
Martin Atkins 034e944070 Move plans/ to internal/plans/
This is part of a general effort to move all of Terraform's non-library
package surface under internal in order to reinforce that these are for
internal use within Terraform only.

If you were previously importing packages under this prefix into an
external codebase, you could pin to an earlier release tag as an interim
solution until you've make a plan to achieve the same functionality some
other way.
2021-05-17 14:09:07 -07:00