When creating a CloudWatch Metric for an Application Load Balancer Target Group it is
neccessary to use the suffix of the ARN as the reference to the load
balancer TG . This commit exposes that as an attribute on the `aws_alb_target_group`
resource to prevent the need to use regular expression substitution to
make the reference.
Fixes#9410
When importing an azurerm_virtual_network that has no DNSServers,
terraform was throwing a panic as it was trying to dereference that list
of servers to set to state
This commit adds a simple check to make sure there are DNSServers before
dereferencing them
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMVirtualNetwork_' 2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/10/31 11:20:36 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v
-run=TestAccAzureRMVirtualNetwork_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualNetwork_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualNetwork_importBasic (150.63s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualNetwork_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualNetwork_basic (122.90s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualNetwork_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualNetwork_disappears (113.07s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualNetwork_withTags
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualNetwork_withTags (139.56s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm526.168
```
Fixes#8679
The CallerReference attribute we passed to AWS in route53_health_checks
was `time.Now().Format(time.RFC3339Nano)`
When creating multiple resources with the Count meta-parameter, this was
causing issues as follows:
```
* aws_route53_health_check.healthstate.0: HealthCheckAlreadyExists: A different health check has already been created with the specified caller reference.
```
We have now exposed a new attribute called `reference_name` that can be set to pass multiple resources to the request
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_' 130 ↵ ✹
==> Cecking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/10/31 10:41:07 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_importBasic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_importBasic (17.08s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_basic (28.17s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_withSearchString
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_withSearchString (28.07s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_withChildHealthChecks
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_withChildHealthChecks (20.71s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_IpConfig
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_IpConfig (16.09s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_CloudWatchAlarmCheck
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53HealthCheck_CloudWatchAlarmCheck (22.42s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 132.568s
```
The update of the test was causing a test failure - it was setting
desired_count to 1 when miz_size was set to 2 - this was causing a
perpetual diff in the test
Was failing due to using IAM user `test-name` as it was being used in
more than 1 place - this has been replaced by a random user and random
policy names now
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSUserPolicyAttachment_basic' 2 ↵ ✹
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/10/31 08:39:08 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSUserPolicyAttachment_basic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSUserPolicyAttachment_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSUserPolicyAttachment_basic (32.04s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 32.053s
```
Previously this resource (and, by extension, the aws_ami_copy and
aws_ami_from_instance resources that share much of its implementation)
was handling correctly the case where an AMI had been recently
deregistered, and was thus still returned from the API, but not correctly
dealing with the situation where the AMI has been removed altogether.
Now we additionally handle the NotFound error returned by the API when
we request a non-existent AMI, and remove the AMI from the state in the
same way we do for deregistered AMIs.
Fixes#6327
Deposed instances weren't calling PostApply which was causing the counts
for what happened during `apply` to be wrong. This was a simple fix to
ensure we call that hook.
Fixes#5342
The dynamically expanded subgraph wasn't being validated so cycles
weren't being caught here and Terraform would just hang. This fixes
that.
Note that it may make sense to validate higher level when the graph is
expanded but there are certain cases we actually expect the graph to
potentially be invalid, so this seems safer for now.
To avoid the issue #8011 I have updated the used client library, with
this update I don't get the mentioned issues like `unexpected EOF`
anymore.
Fixes#8011
Fixes#5826
The `prevent_destroy` lifecycle configuration was not being checked when
the count was decreased for a resource with a count. It was only
checking when attributes changed on pre-existing resources.
This fixes that.
Fixes#5409
I didn't expect this to be such a rabbit hole!
Based on git history, it appears that for "historical reasons"(tm),
setting up the various `state.State` structures for a plan were
_completely different logic_ than a normal `terraform apply`. This meant
that it was skipping things like disabling backups with `-backup="-"`.
This PR unifies loading from a plan to the normal state setup mechanism.
A few tests that were failing prior to this PR were added, no existing
tests were changed.
* Pass over the Interpolation page
Fixes some grammar, typos and structure. Updated some headings and fixed
a couple of spelling mistakes.
* Added proper note syntax
* Turned some notes into actual notes
* Couple of minor typos just noticed
Fixes#5138
If an item is optional and is removed completely from the configuration,
it should still trigger a destroy/create if the field itself was marked
as "ForceNew".
See the example in #5138.
Anshul Sharma