Fixes#10042Fixes#9989
Another panic was found with this resource. IT essentially was causing a
panic when no certificates were found. This was due to the casting of
status to []string
There are times when there are no statuses passed in. Made the error
message a lot more generic now rather than having something like this
```
No certificate with statuses [] for domain mytestdomain.com found in this region.
```
This now becomes:
```
No certificate for domain mytestdomain.com found in this region.
```
Also, added a test to show that the panic is gone
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAwsAcmCertificateDataSource_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/11 15:11:33 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAwsAcmCertificateDataSource_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAwsAcmCertificateDataSource_noMatchReturnsError
--- PASS: TestAccAwsAcmCertificateDataSource_noMatchReturnsError (6.07s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws6.094s
```
* provider/azurerm: allow updating of lb_rule resource
* check if rule is being updated rather than assuming created
* added test to cover guard against multiple rules with the same name
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run "TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_" -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_basic (157.45s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_removal
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_removal (163.67s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_inconsistentReads
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_inconsistentReads (150.00s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_update
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_update (164.20s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_duplicateRules
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerRule_duplicateRules (137.51s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 772.846s
* provider/azurerm: allow updating of lb_nat_rule resource
* check if NAT rule is being updated rather than assuming created
* added test to cover guard against multiple NAT rules with the same name
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run "TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule" -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_basic (148.48s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_removal
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_removal (163.48s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_update
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_update (176.97s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_duplicate
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatRule_duplicate (136.36s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 625.301s
* provider/azurerm: allow updating of lb_probe resource
* check if probe is being updated rather than assuming created
* added test to cover guard against multiple probes with the same name
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run "TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe" -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_basic (134.53s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_removal
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_removal (168.06s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_update
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_update (175.99s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_duplicate
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerProbe_duplicate (139.01s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 617.598s
* provider/azurerm: allow updating of lb_nat_pool resource
* check if NAT pool is being updated rather than assuming created
* added test to cover guard against multiple NAT pools with the same name
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run "TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool" -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_basic (146.52s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_removal
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_removal (158.34s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_update
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_update (174.05s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_duplicate
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLoadBalancerNatPool_duplicate (136.94s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 615.866s
* allow underscore in database_name [redshift]
Fixes#10009
* Added Test Cases To Validate Redshift DBName
* Remove Old Test Cases Regarding Redshift DBName Validation
* Added More Test Cases For Redshift DBName
Because we now rely on HIL to do the computed calculation, we must make
sure the type is correct (TypeUnknown). Before, we'd just check for the
UUID in the string.
This changes all variable returns in the interpolater to run it through
`hil.InterfaceToVariable` which handles this lookup for us.
Also added a test to prove that the computed value gets set
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSDBInstance_basic'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/11/10 06:26:22 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSDBInstance_basic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSDBInstance_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDBInstance_basic (634.33s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws634.347s
```
This uses the new NodeApplyableProvider graph nodes. This will just make
it easier for us in the future to adopt new graph transforms by starting
to use the new ones here.
Fixes#7774
This modifies the `import` command to load configuration files from the
pwd. This also augments the configuration loading section for the CLI to
have a new option (default false, same as old behavior) to
allow directories with no Terraform configurations.
For import, we allow directories with no Terraform configurations so
this option is set to true.
The primary change here is to expect that Config contains computed
values. This introduces `unknownCheckWalker` that does a really basic
reflectwalk to look for computed values and use that for IsComputed.
We had a weird mixture before checking whether c.Config was simply
missing values to determine where to look. Now we rely on IsComputed
heavily.
Paul Stack