Sidebar:
- Rename "Azure (Resource Manager)" to "Microsoft Azure" and sort
accordingly
- Rename "Azure (Service Management)" to "Microsoft Azure (Legacy ASM)"
and sort accordingly
ARM provider docs:
- Name changes everywhere to Microsoft Azure Provider
- Mention and link to "legacy Azure Service Management Provider" in opening paragraph
- Sidebar gains link at bottom to Azure Service Management Provider
ASM provider docs:
- Name changes everywhere to Azure Service Management Provider
- Sidebar gains link at bottom to Microsoft Azure Provider
- Every page gets a header with the following
- "NOTE: The Azure Service Management provider is no longer being actively developed by HashiCorp employees. It continues to be supported by the community. We recommend using the Azure Resource Manager based [Microsoft Azure Provider] instead if possible."
* add opsworks permission resource
* add docs
* remove permission from state if the permission object could not be found
* remove nil validate function. validation is done in schema.Resource.
* add id to the list of exported values
* renge over permission to check that we have found got the correct one
* removed comment
* removed set id
* fix unknown region us-east-1c
* add user_profile resource
* add docs
* add default value
* provider/aws: Support kms_key_id for `aws_rds_cluster`
```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRDSCluster_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v -run=TestAccAWSRDSCluster_
-timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAWSRDSCluster_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRDSCluster_basic (127.57s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRDSCluster_kmsKey
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRDSCluster_kmsKey (323.72s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRDSCluster_encrypted
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRDSCluster_encrypted (173.25s)
=== RUN TestAccAWSRDSCluster_backupsUpdate
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRDSCluster_backupsUpdate (264.07s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws 888.638s
```
* provider/aws: Add KMS Key ID to `aws_rds_cluster_instance`
```
```
Fixes#7299 where it was found that computer_name is not optional (as
the msdn documentation states)
```
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /vendor/)
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run=TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicLinuxMachine
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicLinuxMachine (403.53s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_tags
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_tags (488.46s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_updateMachineSize
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_updateMachineSize (601.82s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicWindowsMachine
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_basicWindowsMachine (646.75s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_windowsUnattendedConfig
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_windowsUnattendedConfig (891.42s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_winRMConfig
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_winRMConfig (768.73s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 3800.734s
```
* docs/digitalocean: Adding an import section to the bottom of the DO
importable resources
* docs/azurerm: Adding the Import sections for the AzureRM Importable resources
* docs/aws: Adding the import sections to the AWS provider pages
* Add scaleway provider
this PR allows the entire scaleway stack to be managed with terraform
example usage looks like this:
```
provider "scaleway" {
api_key = "snap"
organization = "snip"
}
resource "scaleway_ip" "base" {
server = "${scaleway_server.base.id}"
}
resource "scaleway_server" "base" {
name = "test"
# ubuntu 14.04
image = "aecaed73-51a5-4439-a127-6d8229847145"
type = "C2S"
}
resource "scaleway_volume" "test" {
name = "test"
size_in_gb = 20
type = "l_ssd"
}
resource "scaleway_volume_attachment" "test" {
server = "${scaleway_server.base.id}"
volume = "${scaleway_volume.test.id}"
}
resource "scaleway_security_group" "base" {
name = "public"
description = "public gateway"
}
resource "scaleway_security_group_rule" "http-ingress" {
security_group = "${scaleway_security_group.base.id}"
action = "accept"
direction = "inbound"
ip_range = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "TCP"
port = 80
}
resource "scaleway_security_group_rule" "http-egress" {
security_group = "${scaleway_security_group.base.id}"
action = "accept"
direction = "outbound"
ip_range = "0.0.0.0/0"
protocol = "TCP"
port = 80
}
```
Note that volume attachments require the server to be stopped, which can lead to
downtimes of you attach new volumes to already used servers
* Update IP read to handle 404 gracefully
* Read back resource on update
* Ensure IP detachment works as expected
Sadly this is not part of the official scaleway api just yet
* Adjust detachIP helper
based on feedback from @QuentinPerez in
https://github.com/scaleway/scaleway-cli/pull/378
* Cleanup documentation
* Rename api_key to access_key
following @stack72 suggestion and rename the provider api_key for more clarity
* Make tests less chatty by using custom logger
We cannot use the "id" field to represent policy ID, because it is used
internally by Terraform. Also change the "id" field within a statement
to "sid" for consistency with the generated JSON.
The template resources don't actually need to retain any state, so they
are good candidates to be data sources.
This includes a few tweaks to the acceptance tests -- now configured to
run as unit tests -- since it seems that they have been slightly broken
for a while now. In particular, the "update" cases are no longer tested
because updating is not a meaningful operation for a data source.
When adding multiple notifications from one S3 bucket to one SQS queue, it wasn't immediately intuitive how to do this.
At first I created two `aws_s3_bucket_notification` configs and it seemed to work fine, however the config for one event
will overwrite the other. In order to have multiple events, you can defined the `queue` key twice, or use an array if you're
working with the JSON syntax. I tried to make this more clear in the documentation.
stack72