Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mitchell Hashimoto d59725e9fd
terraform: convert StateDeps to use new structs 2017-01-26 20:47:20 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto d3df7874d5
terraform: introduce EvalApplyPre so that PreApply is called even for
destroy provisioners.
2017-01-20 20:36:53 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto e9f6c9c429
terraform: run destroy provisioners on destroy 2017-01-20 18:07:51 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 0e4a6e3e89
terraform: apply resource must depend on destroy deps
Fixes #10440

This updates the behavior of "apply" resources to depend on the
destroy versions of their dependencies.

We make an exception to this behavior when the "apply" resource is CBD.
This is odd and not 100% correct, but it mimics the behavior of the
legacy graphs and avoids us having to do major core work to support the
100% correct solution.

I'll explain this in examples...

Given the following configuration:

    resource "null_resource" "a" {
       count = "${var.count}"
    }

    resource "null_resource" "b" {
      triggers { key = "${join(",", null_resource.a.*.id)}" }
    }

Assume we've successfully created this configuration with count = 2.
When going from count = 2 to count = 1, `null_resource.b` should wait
for `null_resource.a.1` to destroy.

If it doesn't, then it is a race: depending when we interpolate the
`triggers.key` attribute of `null_resource.b`, we may get 1 value or 2.
If `null_resource.a.1` is destroyed, we'll get 1. Otherwise, we'll get
2. This was the root cause of #10440

In the legacy graphs, `null_resource.b` would depend on the destruction
of any `null_resource.a` (orphans, tainted, anything!). This would
ensure proper ordering. We mimic that behavior here.

The difference is CBD. If `null_resource.b` has CBD enabled, then the
ordering **in the legacy graph** becomes:

  1. null_resource.b (create)
  2. null_resource.b (destroy)
  3. null_resource.a (destroy)

In this case, the update would always have 2 values for `triggers.key`,
even though we were destroying a resource later! This scenario required
two `terraform apply` operations.

This is what the CBD check is for in this PR. We do this to mimic the
behavior of the legacy graph.

The correct solution to do one day is to allow splat references
(`null_resource.a.*.id`) to happen in parallel and only read up to to
the `count` amount in the state. This requires some fairly significant
work close to the 0.8 release date, so we can defer this to later and
adopt the 0.7.x behavior for now.
2016-12-03 23:54:29 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 3b2282ca57
terraform: Destroy node should only include deposed for specific index
Fixes #10338

The destruction step for a resource was included the deposed resources
for _all_ resources with that name (ignoring the "index"). For example:
`aws_instance.foo.0` was including destroying deposed for
`aws_instance.foo.1`.

This changes the config to the deposed transformer to properly include
that index.

This change includes a larger change of changing `stateId` to include
the index. This affected more parts but was ultimately the issue in
question.
2016-11-29 09:16:18 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto f50c7acf95
terraform: record dependency to self (other index)
Fixes #10313

The new graph wasn't properly recording resource dependencies to a
specific index of itself. For example: `foo.bar.2` depending on
`foo.bar.0` wasn't shown in the state when it should've been.

This adds a test to verify this and fixes it.
2016-11-23 09:25:20 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto c6fd938fb8
terraform: EvalInstanceInfo on data sources in new graph
This doesn't cause any practical issues as far as I'm aware (couldn't
get any test to fail), but caused shadow errors since it wasn't matching
the prior behavior.
2016-11-15 09:02:10 -08:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 4a6cc3b100
terraform: new apply resource node supports data sources
This enables the new apply graph's resource node to apply data sources.
Data sources appear to only be tested for "refresh" which is likely
where they're set but they've also been implemented (not my code, not
trying to edit code) within the "apply" operation as well.

This adds an apply test to ensure data sources work, and then modifies
the new apply node to support data sources.
2016-10-20 22:03:48 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 6622ca001d
terraform: abstract resource nodes 2016-10-19 13:38:53 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 7baf64f806
terraform: starting CBD, destroy edge for the destroy relationship 2016-10-19 13:38:52 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 311d27108e
terraform: Enable DestroyEdgeTransformer 2016-10-19 13:38:52 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto bd5d97f9f5
terraform: transform to attach resource configs 2016-10-19 13:38:52 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 80ef7f1acf
terraform: properly compare bad diffs 2016-10-19 13:38:51 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 9e8cd48cda
terraform: add destroy nodes, destroys kind of work 2016-10-19 13:38:51 -07:00
Mitchell Hashimoto 2e8a419fd8
terraform: starting work on destroy 2016-10-19 13:38:51 -07:00