* provider/aws: Refresh ssm document from state on 404
Originally reported in #13976
When an SSM Document was deleted outside of Terraform, a terraform
refresh would return the following:
```
% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_ssm_document.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: test_document-stack72)
Error refreshing state: 1 error(s) occurred:
* aws_ssm_document.foo: aws_ssm_document.foo: [ERROR] Error describing SSM document: InvalidDocument:
status code: 400, request id: 70c9bed1-33bb-11e7-99aa-697e9b0914e9
```
On applying this patch, it now looks as follows:
```
% terraform plan
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but will not be
persisted to local or remote state storage.
aws_ssm_document.foo: Refreshing state... (ID: test_document-stack72)
The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.
Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.
+ aws_ssm_document.foo
arn: "<computed>"
content: " {\n \"schemaVersion\": \"1.2\",\n \"description\": \"Check ip configuration of a Linux instance.\",\n \"parameters\": {\n\n },\n \"runtimeConfig\": {\n \"aws:runShellScript\": {\n \"properties\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"0.aws:runShellScript\",\n \"runCommand\": [\"ifconfig\"]\n }\n ]\n }\n }\n }\n"
created_date: "<computed>"
default_version: "<computed>"
description: "<computed>"
document_type: "Command"
hash: "<computed>"
hash_type: "<computed>"
latest_version: "<computed>"
name: "test_document-stack72"
owner: "<computed>"
parameter.#: "<computed>"
platform_types.#: "<computed>"
schema_version: "<computed>"
status: "<computed>"
Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 0 to destroy.
```
* Update resource_aws_ssm_document.go
* Add schema_version as computed ssm document attribute
* Update the SSM document itself if the content has changed and it has a schema >= 2.0
* Add default_version as DocumentVersion in SSM doc update
* Acceptance test for updating an SSM document
* Better error handling in updating SSM documents
* Add SSM document update documentation
* Better names for SSM input params
As noticed in the acceptance tests, we were expecting the document to be
deleted but it was still found
```
=== RUN TestAccAWSSSMDocument_permission
--- FAIL: TestAccAWSSSMDocument_permission (5.60s)
testing.go:329: Error destroying resource! WARNING: Dangling
resources
may exist. The full state and error is shown below.
Error: Check failed: Expected AWS SSM
Document to be gone, but was still found
State: <no state>
```
* provider/aws: Add errcheck to Makefile, error on unchecked errors
* more exceptions
* updates for errcheck to pass
* reformat and spilt out the ignore statements
* narrow down ignores
* fix typo, only ignore Close and Write, instead of close or write
* provider/aws: add `aws_ssm_document` resource
* provider/aws: Changes to `aws_ssm_document` post code review
The changes are things like using d.Id rather than d.Get("name").(string)
and errwrap.Wrapf rather than fmt.Errorf
Paul Stack