also removed the notion of tags from the redshift security group and
parameter group documentation until that has been implemented
Redshift Cluster CRUD and acceptance tests
Removing the Acceptance test for the Cluster Updates. You cannot delete
a cluster immediately after performing an operation on it. We would need
to add a lot of retry logic to the system to get this test to work
Adding some schema validation for RedShift cluster
Adding the last of the pieces of a first draft of the Redshift work - this is the documentation
Changed the aws_redshift_security_group and aws_redshift_parameter_group
to remove the tags from the schema. Tags are a little bit more
complicated than originally though - I will revisit this later
Then added the schema, CRUD functionality and basic acceptance tests for
aws_redshift_subnet_group
Adding an acceptance test for the Update of subnet_ids in AWS Redshift Subnet Group
This commit adds the openstack_lb_member_v1 resource. This resource models a
load balancing member which was previously coupled to the openstack_lb_pool_v1
resource.
By creating an actual member resource, load balancing members can now be
dynamically managed through terraform.
- Add documentation for resources
- Rename files to match standard patterns
- Add acceptance tests for resource groups
- Add acceptance tests for vnets
- Remove ARM_CREDENTIALS file - as discussed this does not appear to be
an Azure standard, and there is scope for confusion with the
azureProfile.json file which the CLI generates. If a standard emerges
we can reconsider this.
- Validate credentials in the schema
- Remove storage testing artefacts
- Use ARM IDs as Terraform IDs
- Use autorest hooks for logging
Conflicts:
builtin/providers/google/provider.go
builtin/providers/google/resource_subscription.go
builtin/providers/google/resource_subscription_test.go
golang pubsub SDK has been released. moved topics/subscriptions to use that
Conflicts:
builtin/providers/google/provider.go
builtin/providers/google/resource_subscription.go
builtin/providers/google/resource_subscription_test.go
file renames and add documentation files
remove typo'd merge and type file move
add to index page as well
only need to define that once
remove topic_computed schema value
I think this was used at one point but is no longer. away.
cleanup typo
adds a couple more config values
- ackDeadlineSeconds: number of seconds to wait for an ack
- pushAttributes: attributes of a push subscription
- pushEndpoint: target for a push subscription
rearrange to better match current conventions
respond to all of the comments
This commit adds further work to the OpenStack port resource:
* Makes relevant fields computed
* Adds state change functions
* Adds acceptance tests
* Adds Documentation
As of this commit this provider has only logical resources that allow
the creation of private keys, self-signed certs and certificate requests.
These can be useful when creating other resources that use TLS
certificates, such as AWS Elastic Load Balancers.
Later it could grow to include support for real certificate provision from
CAs using the LetsEncrypt ACME protocol, once it is stable.
A "Layer" is a particular service that forms part of the infrastructure for
a set of applications. Some layers are application servers and others are
pure infrastructure, like MySQL servers or load balancers.
Although the AWS API only has one type called "Layer", it actually has
a number of different "soft" types that each have slightly different
validation rules and extra properties that are packed into the Attributes
map.
To make the validation rule differences explicit in Terraform, and to make
the Terraform structure more closely resemble the OpsWorks UI than its
API, we use a separate resource type per layer type, with the common code
factored out into a shared struct type.
"Stack" is the root concept in OpsWorks, and acts as a container for a number
of different "layers" that each provide some service for an application.
A stack isn't very interesting on its own, but it needs to be created before
any layers can be created.
Here we add an OpsWorks client instance to the central client bundle and
establish a new documentation section, both of which will be fleshed out in
subsequent commits that add some OpsWorks resources.
AWS provides three different ways to create AMIs that each have different
inputs, but once they are complete the same management operations apply.
Thus these three resources each have a different "Create" implementation
but then share the same "Read", "Update" and "Delete" implementations.
Common metadata state is now stored
Optimistic locking support added to common_metadata
Revisions to keys in project metadata are now reflected in the project state
Wrote tests for project metadata (all pass)
Relaxed test conditions to work on projects with extra keys
Added documentation for project metadata
* upstream/master:
Update CHANGELOG.md
Update CHANGELOG.md
provider/aws: allow external ENI attachments
Update AWS provider documentation
docs/aws: Fix example of aws_iam_role_policy
provider/aws: S3 bucket test that should fail
provider/aws: Return if Bucket not found
Update CHANGELOG.md
Update CHANGELOG.md
helper/schema: record schema version when destroy fails
settings file is not required
provider/azure: Allow settings_file to accept XML string
add note to aws_iam_policy_attachment explaining its use/limitations
docs: clarify template_file path information
google: Sort resources by alphabet in docs
Support go get in go 1.5
Update CHANGELOG.md
aws_network_interface attachment block is not required
provider/aws: Fix issue in Security Group Rules where the Security Group is not found
With so many AWS provider resources, the docs are getting pretty hard
to navigate. This is particularly true due to the mismatch of some
resources encoding the service name (like aws_route53_record) but some
others ignoring it (like aws_subnet) or using a generic prefix (like
aws_db_instance), which causes an alphabetical ordering to muddle
up all of the services.
Since the AWS UI and docs are themselves oriented around services, most
users should be familiar with the service brands and understand which
resources belong to which service. Thus this categorization follows the
primary categorization used within the AWS Console, preferring EC2-VPC
over EC2-Classic-style bucketing.
James Nugent