When two rules differ only in source security group, EC2 APIs return
them as a single rule, but Terraform requires separate
aws_security_group_rule resources.
6bdab07174 changed Read to set source_security_group_id (and
cidr_blocks) from the rule returned from EC2 and chose the first
source_security_group_id arbitrarily, which is wrong.
Makes TestAccAWSSecurityGroupRule_PartialMatching_Source pass again.
Also adds a comment noting that there is a bug in the new resource
importing feature.
Fixes#6728.
* TF-6256 - SG Rule Retry
- Preferring slower but consistent runs when AWS API calls do not properly return the SG Rule in the list of ingress/egress rules.
- Testing has shown that several times that we had to exceed 20 attempts
before the SG was actually returned
* TF-6256 - Refactor of rule lookup
- Adjusting to use resource.Retry
- Extract lookup method for matching ipPermissions set
This commit uses Group Name in preference to Group ID where appropriate
in the aws_security_group_rule resource. This fixes the crash reported
in #5310.
Fixes#5310.
This addresses the case where `compact` has not been used on a list
passed into security group as cidr_block. See #3786. Compact is still
the correct answer there, but we should prefer returning an error to
a panic. Fixes#3786.
Because `aws_security_group_rule` resources are an abstraction on top of
Security Groups, they must interact with the AWS Security Group APIs in
a pattern that often results in lots of parallel requests interacting
with the same security group.
We've found that this pattern can trigger race conditions resulting in
inconsistent behavior, including:
* Rules that report as created but don't actually exist on AWS's side
* Rules that show up in AWS but don't register as being created
locally, resulting in follow up attempts to authorize the rule
failing w/ Duplicate errors
Here, we introduce a per-SG mutex that must be held by any security
group before it is allowed to interact with AWS APIs. This protects the
space between `DescribeSecurityGroup` and `Authorize*` / `Revoke*`
calls, ensuring that no other rules interact with the SG during that
span.
The included test exposes the race by applying a security group with
lots of rules, which based on the dependency graph can all be handled in
parallel. This fails most of the time without the new locking behavior.
I've omitted the mutex from `Read`, since it is only called during the
Refresh walk when no changes are being made, meaning a bunch of parallel
`DescribeSecurityGroup` API calls should be consistent in that case.
Fixes crash in #2431
Decided that `findResourceSecurityGroup` should return an error when
the SG is not found, since the callers cannot happily continue with a
`nil` SG
Also passes through a few error cases that were being swallowed.
/cc @catsby
Previously they would conflict you had multiple security group rules
with the same ingress or egress ports but different source security
groups because only the CIDR blocks were considered (which are empty
when using source security groups).
Updated to include migrations (from clint@ctshryock.com)
Signed-off-by: Clint Shryock <clint@ctshryock.com>
This landed in aws-sdk-go yesterday, breaking the AWS provider in many places:
3c259c9586
Here, with much sedding, grepping, and manual massaging, we attempt to
catch Terraform up to the new `awserr.Error` interface world.
David Glasser