* Document source block for archive_file data source.
* Add example for archive_file source block.
* Capitalize Optional/Required for consistency with majority of provider docs.
* core/providersplit: Split OPC Provider to separate repo
As we march towards Terraform 0.10.0, we are going to start building the
terraform providers as separate binaries - this will allow us to
continually release them. Before we go to 0.10.0, we need to be able to
continue building providers in the same manner, therefore, we have
hardcoded the path of the provider in the generate-plugins.go file
The interim solution will require us to vendor the opc provider and any
child dependencies, but when we get to 0.10.0, we will no longer have to
do this - the core will auto download the plugin binary. The plugin
package will have it's own dependencies vendored as well.
* core/providersplit: Removing the builtin version of OPC provider
* core/providersplit: Vendoring the OPC plugin
* core/providersplit: update internal plugin list
* core/providersplit: remove unused govendor item
Correctly sets the attribute `ip_address` in the `opc_compute_ip_address_reservation` resource.
Also updates documentation for the `ip_address_pool` attribute.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/opc TESTARGS="-run=TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic"
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/05/16 10:15:53 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/opc -v -run=TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic
--- PASS: TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic (22.60s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/opc 22.604s
```
The author made this mistake at the beginning. With the original sample, you can't create `aws_appautoscaling_policy` properly. No threshold data in it. It is hard to troubleshoot this issue because there is no error to run the sample with `metric_interval_lower_bound = 0'
The existing "tag" field on autoscaling groups is very limited in that it
cannot be used in conjunction with interpolation preventing from adding
dynamic tag entries.
Other AWS resources don't have this restriction on tags because they work
directly on the map type.
AWS autoscaling groups on the other hand have an additional field
"propagate_at_launch" which is not usable with a pure map type.
This fixes it by introducing an additional field called "tags" which
allows specifying a list of maps. This preserves the possibility to
declare tags as with the "tag" field but additionally allows to
construct lists of maps using interpolation syntax.
Jake Champlin