A while back `atlas_artifact` was switched from being a `resource` to a `data` provider. When you use the examples suggested in the Terraform Enterprise docs, the Terraform cli shows a deprecation warning and provides an old url to the new data provider docs.
There are some complimentary doc updates in the Terraform Enterprise/Atlas repo.
* vendor: Updating Gophercloud for OpenStack Provider
* provider/openstack: Enable Security Group Updates
This commit enables security group names and descriptions to
be updated without causing a recreate.
* Exposing moid value from vm resource
moid value is needed by NSX resources, like security tag, when we attached security tags to a VMs, so needed before we commit NSX provider.
* fixing gofmt issue
* Updating docs regarding new exported moid attribute.
* vendor: Update go-gitlab to master@e6c11e
Update go-gitlab to master@e6c11e. This brings in UpdateGroup in
addition to fuller management of other attributes.
* provider/gitlab: Add `gitlab_group` resource
This adds a gitlab_group resource.
This combined with #14483 will allow you to create projects in a
group.
* Update sources.html.markdown
Moduels not updating was really annoying, should add this documentation in to increase usability of the feature.
* Update sources.html.markdown
* provider/gitlab: add `gitlab_deploy_key`
Here we extend the gitlab provider further by adding a `gitlab_deploy_key`
resource. This resource allows management of a projects deploy
keys.
* provider/gitlab: Do not test `gitlab_deploy_key` `can_push`
Here we remove the testing of the `can_push` attribute. This makes the
tests less comprehensive, but will allow them to work with the current
release of gitlab-ce.
This change is staged as a distinct commit so it can be easily
dropped/reverted once gitlab MR !11607 has reached a released state.
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/11607
* provider/gitlab: Update docs for gitlab_deploy_key/can_push
Note that the can_push attribute of gitlab_deploy_key doesn't currently
work. This note can be removed once
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/11607 is merged
and in general circulation.
system volumes on scaleway can't easily be modified - instead one has to create
a new image with the desired system volume size. This is way out of scope of
terraform - see https://community.online.net/t/expanding-lssd/907/2 for steps on
how to build a new image.
the `scaleway_server` `volume` attribute should only be used if you want to
attach additional volumes to a server which will share the lifetime of the
server, e.g. they will be destroyed once the server is shut down.
To have volumes which outlive the attached server one should use
`scaleway_volume` and `scaleway_volume_attachement` instead.
Prior to Terraform 0.7, lists in Terraform were just a shallow abstraction
on top of strings with a magic delimiter between items. Wrapping a single
string in brackets in the configuration was Terraform's prompt that it
needed to split the string on that delimiter during interpolation.
In 0.7, when first-class lists were added, this convention was preserved
by flattening lists-of-lists by one level when they were encountered in
configuration. However, there was an oversight in that change where it
did not correctly handle the case where the inner list was unknown.
In #14135 we removed some code that was flattening partially-unknown lists
into fully-unknown (untyped) values. This inadvertently exposed the missed
case from the previous paragraph, causing issues for list-wrapped splat
expressions with unknown members. While this worked fine for resources,
due to some fixup done inside helper/schema, this did not work for other
interpolation contexts such as module blocks.
Various attempts to fix this up and restore the flattening behavior
selectively were unsuccessful, due to a proliferation of assumptions all
over the core code that would be too risky to change just to fix this bug.
This change, then, takes the different approach of removing the
requirement that splats be presented inside list brackets. This
requirement didn't make much sense anymore anyway, since no other
list-returning expression had this constraint and so the rest of Terraform
was already successfully dealing with both cases.
This leaves us with two different scenarios:
- For resource arguments, existing normalization code in helper/schema
does its own flattening that preserves compatibility with the common
practice of using bracketed splats. This change proves this with a test
within the "test" provider that exercises the whole Terraform core and
helper/schema stack that assigns bracketed splats to list and set
attributes.
- For arguments in other blocks, such as in module callsites, the
interpolator's own flattening behavior applies to known lists,
preserving compatibility with configurations from before
partially-computed splats were possible, but those wishing to use
partially-computed splats are required to drop the surrounding brackets.
This is less concerning because this scenario was introduced only in
0.9.5, so the scope for breakage is limited to those who adopted this
new feature quickly after upgrading.
As of this commit, the recommendation is to stop using brackets around
splats but the old form continues to be supported for backward
compatibility. In a future _major_ version of Terraform we will probably
phase out this legacy form to improve consistency, but for now both
forms are acceptable at the expense of some (pre-existing) weird behavior
when _actual_ lists-of-lists are used.
This addresses #14521 by officially adopting the suggested workaround of
dropping the brackets around the splat. However, it doesn't yet allow
passing of a partially-unknown list between modules: that still violates
assumptions in Terraform's core, so for the moment partially-unknown lists
work only within a _single_ interpolation expression, and cannot be
passed around between expressions. Until more holistic work is done to
improve Terraform's type handling, passing a partially-unknown splat
through to a module will result in a fully-unknown list emerging on
the other side, just as was the case before #14135; this change just
addresses the fact that this was failing with an error in 0.9.5.
* Support importing google_sql_user
* Updated documentation to reflect that passwords are not retrieved.
* Added additional documentation detailing use.
* Removed unneeded d.setId() line from GoogleSqlUser Read method.
* Changed an errors.New() call to fmt.Errorf().
* Migrate schemas of existing GoogleSqlUser resources.
* Remove explicitly setting 'id' property
* Added google_sql_user to importability page.
* Changed separator to '/' from '.' and updated tests + debug messages.
* Add Network Alias configuration with network options
* Handle case where there's no network option
* Handle use case where network option is not available
* Handle use case where network option is not available
* Network alias only on user defined network
* Update documentation for docker provider on network aliases
* Remove unused variable
* Update documentation
* add unit test for docker container network
* fix unit test for docker container network
The tests did pass, but that was because they only tested part of the changes. By using the `schema.TestResourceDataRaw` function the schema and config are better tested and so they pointed out a problem with the schema of the Chef provisioner.
The `Elem` fields did not have a `*schema.Schema` but a `schema.Schema` and in an `Elem` schema only the `Type` field may (and must) be set. Any other fields like `Optional` are not allowed here.
Next to fixing that problem I also did a little refactoring and cleaning up. Mainly making the `ProvisionerS` private (`provisioner`) and removing the deprecated fields.
* Document source block for archive_file data source.
* Add example for archive_file source block.
* Capitalize Optional/Required for consistency with majority of provider docs.
* core/providersplit: Split OPC Provider to separate repo
As we march towards Terraform 0.10.0, we are going to start building the
terraform providers as separate binaries - this will allow us to
continually release them. Before we go to 0.10.0, we need to be able to
continue building providers in the same manner, therefore, we have
hardcoded the path of the provider in the generate-plugins.go file
The interim solution will require us to vendor the opc provider and any
child dependencies, but when we get to 0.10.0, we will no longer have to
do this - the core will auto download the plugin binary. The plugin
package will have it's own dependencies vendored as well.
* core/providersplit: Removing the builtin version of OPC provider
* core/providersplit: Vendoring the OPC plugin
* core/providersplit: update internal plugin list
* core/providersplit: remove unused govendor item
Correctly sets the attribute `ip_address` in the `opc_compute_ip_address_reservation` resource.
Also updates documentation for the `ip_address_pool` attribute.
```
$ make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/opc TESTARGS="-run=TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic"
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2017/05/16 10:15:53 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/opc -v -run=TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic
--- PASS: TestAccOPCIPAddressReservation_Basic (22.60s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/opc 22.604s
```
The author made this mistake at the beginning. With the original sample, you can't create `aws_appautoscaling_policy` properly. No threshold data in it. It is hard to troubleshoot this issue because there is no error to run the sample with `metric_interval_lower_bound = 0'
The existing "tag" field on autoscaling groups is very limited in that it
cannot be used in conjunction with interpolation preventing from adding
dynamic tag entries.
Other AWS resources don't have this restriction on tags because they work
directly on the map type.
AWS autoscaling groups on the other hand have an additional field
"propagate_at_launch" which is not usable with a pure map type.
This fixes it by introducing an additional field called "tags" which
allows specifying a list of maps. This preserves the possibility to
declare tags as with the "tag" field but additionally allows to
construct lists of maps using interpolation syntax.
Jake Champlin