We are changing the behaviour of the "stub" diff operation to just have
the pre/post-diff hooks skipped on eval, meaning that the test against
CountHook will ultimately be meaningless and fail, hence we need a
different test here that tests it on a more general level.
This should make things a bit more clear as to what we are doing in the
EvalTree scale-out test - ensuring that we get the correct eval sequence
for a node with no state through EvalTree.
We use the .# key primarily as a hint that we have a list, but its value
describes how many items the writer thinks were in the list.
Since this information is redundant with the _actual_ data, it's
potentially useful as a form of corrupted data detection but this function
isn't equipped to actually report on such a problem (no error return
value, and not in a good place for UI feedback anyway), so instead we'll
largely ignore this value and just go by the number of items we
encounter.
The result of this is that when the counts mismatch we will go by the
number of items actually holding the prefix, rather than panicking as
we would've before.
This fixes the crashes in #15300, #15135 and #15334, though it does not
address any root-cause for the count to be incorrect in the first place,
so there may be something to fix here somewhere else.
When using a `state` command, if the `-state` flag is provided we do not
want to modify the Backend state. In this case we should always create a
local state instance.
The backup flag was also being ignored, and some tests were relying on
that, which have been fixed.
If we provide a -state flag to a state command, we do not want terraform
to modify the backend state. This test fails since the state specified
in the backend doesn't exist
The s3.Backend was using it's own code for DeleteState, but the dynamo
entries are only handled through the RemoteClient. Have DeleteState use
a RemoteClient for delete.
Error loading Terraform: Error downloading modules: error downloading 'ssh://git@bitbucket.org/acme/foo.git?bar': /usr/bin/git exited with 128: Cloning into '.terraform/modules/yadayada'...
invalid command syntax.
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
Remove "checksum" from the error, and only indicate that the plugin has
changed.
Always show requested versions even if it's "any", and found versions of
plugins.
During plan and apply, because the provider constraints need to be built
from a plan, they are not checked until the terraform.Context is
created. Since the context is always requested by the backend during the
Operation, the backend needs to be responsible for generating contextual
error messages for the user.
Instead of formatting the ResolveProviders errors during NewContext,
return a special error type, ResourceProviderError to signal that
init will be required. The backend can then extract and format the
errors.
This change makes various minor adjustments to the rendering of plans
in the output of "terraform plan":
- Resources are identified using the standard resource address syntax,
rather than exposing the legacy internal representation used in the
module diff resource keys. This fixes#8713.
- Subjectively, having square brackets in the addresses made it look more
visually "off" when the same name but with different indices were
shown together with differing-length "symbols", so the symbols are now
all padded and right-aligned to three characters for consistent layout
across all operations.
- The -/+ action is now more visually distinct, using several different
colors to help communicate what it will do and including a more obvious
"(new resource required)" marker to help draw attention to this not
being just an update diff. This fixes#15350.
- The resources are now sorted in a manner that sorts index [10] after
index [9], rather than after index [1] as we did before. This makes it
easier to scan the list and avoids the common confusion where it seems
that there are only 10 items when in fact there are 11-20 items with
all the tens hiding further up in the list.
This is a specialized thin wrapper around parseResourceAddressInternal
that can be used to obtain a ResourceAddress from the keys in
ModuleDiff.Resources.
This is not something we'd ideally expose, but since the internal address
format is already exposed in the ModuleDiff object this ends up being
necessary to process the ModuleDiff from other packages, e.g. for
display in the UI.
Lexicographic sorting by the string form produces the wrong result because
[9] sorts after [10], so this custom comparison function takes that into
account and compares each portion separately to get a more intuitive
result.
This transformer is no longer needed, as we are not transforming
scale-out resource nodes into plannable nodes anymore, but rather just
taking a different eval sequence for resource refresh nodes with no
state.
This test ensures that the right EvalSequence gets set for a refresh
node with no state. This will ultimately assert that nodes on scale out
will not go down the regular refresh path, which would result in an
error due to the nil state - instead, we stub this node so that we get a
diff on it that can be used to effect computed/unknown values on
interpolations that may depend on this node.
Previously init would crash if given these options:
-backend=false -get-plugins=true
This is because the state is used as a source of provider dependency
information, and we need to instantiate the backend to get the state.
To avoid the crash, we now use the following adjusted behavior:
- if -backend=true, we behave as before
- if -backend=false, we instead try to instantiate the backend the same
way any other command would, without modifying its configuration
- if we're able to instantiate the backend, we use it to fetch state
for dependency resolution purposes
- if the backend is not instantiable then we assume it's not yet
configured and proceed with a nil state, which may cause us to see an
incomplete picture of the dependencies but still allows the install
to succeed. Subsequently running "terraform plan" will not work until
the backend is (re-)initialized, so the incomplete picture of required
plugins is safe.
This takes care of a few dangling cases where we were still stringifying
empty version constraints, which creates confusing error messages due to
it stringing as the empty string.
For the "no suitable versions available" message, we fall back on the
"provider not found" message if no versions were found even though it's
unconstrained. This should only happen in an edge case where the
provider's index page exists on the releases server but no versions are
yet present.
For the message about plugin protocol versions, this again is an edge
case since with no constraints this should happen only if we release
an incompatible Terraform version but don't release a new version of the
plugin that's compatible. In this case we just show the constraint as
"(any version)" to make sure we always show _something_.
Since the transformer that changed stateless nodes in refresh to
NodePlannableResourceInstance is not being used anymore, this test
needed to be adjusted to ensure that the right output was expected.
Changed the language of this field to indicate that this diff is not a
"real" diff, in that it should not be acted on, versus a "quiet" mode,
which would indicate just simply to act silently.
Previously we only did this when _upgrading_, but that's unnecessarily
specific and confusing since e.g. plugins can get upgraded implicitly by
constraint changes, which would not then trigger the purge process.
Instead, we'll assume that the user is able to easily re-download plugins
that were purged here, or if they need more specific guarantees they will
manage manually a plugin directory and disable the auto-install behavior
using `-plugin-dir`.
Now we are able to recognize and handle a few special error situations
from plugin installation with more verbose error messages that give the
user better feedback on how to proceed.
Some errors from Get are essentially user error, so we want to be able to
recognize them and give the user good feedback on how to proceed.
Although sentinel values are not an ideal solution to this, it's something
reasonably simple we can do to get this done without lots of refactoring.
Chris Marchesi