* providers.Interface: huge renamification
This commit renames a handful of functions in the providers.Interface to
match changes made in protocol v6. The following commit implements this
change across the rest of the codebase; I put this in a separate commit
for ease of reviewing and will squash these together when merging.
One noteworthy detail: protocol v6 removes the config from the
ValidateProviderConfigResponse, since it's never been used. I chose to
leave that in place in the interface until we deprecate support for
protocol v5 entirely.
Note that none of these changes impact current providers using protocol
v5; the protocol is unchanged. Only the translation layer between the
proto and terraform have changed.
Core was previously ignoring JSON-encoded dynamic values, but these are
technically supported, so we must either error or accept the value.
Since we already have the decoder for Json state, it's minimal effort to
support this on all plugin methods too.
This change also gives providers an easy way to implement the
UpgradeResourceState method. The obvious implementation of returning the same
JSON-encoded value has tripped up a few providers not using the legacy
SDK already, and we should have at least indicated that the value was
being lost.
The main significant change here is that the package name for the proto
definition is "tfplugin5", which is important because this name is part
of the wire protocol for references to types defined in our package.
Along with that, we also move the generated package into "internal" to
make it explicit that importing the generated Go package from elsewhere is
not the right approach for externally-implemented SDKs, which should
instead vendor the proto definition they are using and generate their
own stubs to ensure that the wire protocol is the only hard dependency
between Terraform Core and plugins.
After this is merged, any provider binaries built against our
helper/schema package will need to be rebuilt so that they use the new
"tfplugin5" package name instead of "proto".
In a future commit we will include more elaborate and organized
documentation on how an external codebase might make use of our RPC
interface definition to implement an SDK, but the primary concern here
is to ensure we have the right wire package name before release.
Here we add the GRPCProvisioner and GRPCProvider which implement the
core provisioners.Interface and providers.Interface, and translate
betweeen the core types and the grpc protocol.
Kristin Laemmert