When destroying infrastructure with `--target`, print out which
infrastructure will be destroyed instead of saying `Terraform will
delete all your managed infrastructure`.
```
terraform destroy --target aws_instance.test2 --target aws_instance.test1
Do you really want to destroy?
Terraform will delete the following infrastructure:
aws_instance.test2
aws_instance.test1
There is no undo. Only 'yes' will be accepted to confirm
```
Omitting `--target` arguments will use the default input description.
```
$ terraform destroy
Do you really want to destroy?
Terraform will delete all your managed infrastructure.
There is no undo. Only 'yes' will be accepted to confirm.
```
Previously the plan summary output would consider -/+ diffs as changes
even though they actually destroy and create instances. This was
misleadning and inconsistent with the accounting that gets done for the
similar summary written out after "apply".
Instead we now count the -/+ diffs as both adds and removes, which should
mean that the counts output in the plan summary should match those in
the apply summary, as long as no errors occur during apply.
This fixes#3163.
Sometimes in all the output from ```terraform plan```, it is difficult
to see the ```(forces new resource)``` message.
This patch adds a little bit of color.
By prefixing them with `cmd /c` it will work with both `winner` and
`ssh` connection types.
This PR also reverts some bad stringer changes made in PR #2673
Other than the fact that "The the" doesn't really make any sense anywhere
that it's used in Terraform, they're a post-punk band from the UK.
Fixes "The The" so that they can get back to playing songs.
When you specify `-verbose` you'll get the whole graph of operations,
which gives a better idea of the operations terraform performs and in
what order.
The DOT graph is now generated with a small internal library instead of
simple string building. This allows us to ensure the graph generation is
as consistent as possible, among other benefits.
We set `newrank = true` in the graph, which I've found does just as good
a job organizing things visually as manually attempting to rank the nodes
based on depth.
This also fixes `-module-depth`, which was broken post-AST refector.
Modules are now expanded into subgraphs with labels and borders. We
have yet to regain the plan graphing functionality, so I removed that
from the docs for now.
Finally, if `-draw-cycles` is added, extra colored edges will be drawn
to indicate the path of any cycles detected in the graph.
A notable implementation change included here is that
{Reverse,}DepthFirstWalk has been made deterministic. (Before it was
dependent on `map` ordering.) This turned out to be unnecessary to gain
determinism in the final DOT-level implementation, but it seemed
a desirable enough of a property that I left it in.
Most CBD-related cycles include destroy nodes, and destroy nodes were
all being pruned from the graph before staring the Validate walk.
In practice this meant that we had scenarios that would error out with
graph cycles on Apply that _seemed_ fine during Plan.
This introduces a Verbose option to the GraphBuilder that tells it to
generate a "worst-case" graph. Validate sets this to true so that cycle
errors will always trigger at this step if they're going to happen.
(This Verbose option will be exposed as a CLI flag to `terraform graph`
in a second incoming PR.)
refs #1651
VCS detection was on by default, and blows up when the tests are run in
a copy of the Terraform source that is not a git repository, like - say
- during a Homebrew formula install, just to pick a random example. :)
If the cached state file contains a remote type field with upper case
characters, eg 'Consul', it was no longer possible to find the 'consul'
remote plugin.
Add `-target=resource` flag to core operations, allowing users to
target specific resources in their infrastructure. When `-target` is
used, the operation will only apply to that resource and its
dependencies.
The calculated dependencies are different depending on whether we're
running a normal operation or a `terraform destroy`.
Generally, "dependencies" refers to ancestors: resources falling
_before_ the target in the graph, because their changes are required to
accurately act on the target.
For destroys, "dependencies" are descendents: those resources which fall
_after_ the target. These resources depend on our target, which is going
to be destroyed, so they should also be destroyed.
James Nugent