Official OpenStack clients support specifing custom CA certificate file
that should be used when communicating with OpenStack server. This patch
adds similar behavior to Terraform OpenStack provider, by:
- Using OS_CACERT environmental variable, if available
- Using cacert_file provider parameter, if configured
Fixes issue #4985 by correcting copy/paste error that caused the
max_utilization attribute to be read from the max_rate_per_instance
attribute.
N.B. There is still no test coverage for this issue.
The AWS free tier allows up to 750 hours on t2.micro
instance types. It's better to use cheaper instances
in case the resources are not cleaned up if a tests
is canceled or crashes.
Removes overspecified config that is unrelated to testing the auto scaling
group's autogenerated name. The test is only concerned with checking that
the auto scaling group was created successfully with an autogenerated name
matching a specific pattern.
Removes overspecified config that is unrelated to the auto scaling
group's availability zone and VPC identifier acceptance tests. The
created auto scaling groups do not need to spin up any hosts since
the acceptance tests are only concerned with checking the existence
of the associated availability zones and VPC identifiers.
Fixes a diff calculation error when only a VPC zone
identifiers is provided. In this case the associated
availability zones are computed from the subnets per
the AWS documentation.
* Randomize app name in test
* Return error and don't panic when there is a problem
It's possible there may still be an underlying problem that caused the
error that made the cert leak in the first place - this should help us
diagnose it.
This should address the failures seen in Travis Build Run #8774. It is
likely there are others which also need addressing - they will be
addressed on a case-by-case basis as they come up.
This is a follow up on #4892 with tests that demonstrate creating a record and a zone, then destroying said record, and confirming that a new plan is generated, using the ExpectNonEmptyPlan flag
This simulates the bug reported in #4641 by mimicking the state file that one would have if they created a record with Terraform v0.6.6, which is to say a weight = 0 for a default value.
When upgrading, there would be an expected plan change to get that to -1. To mimic the statefile we apply the record and then in a follow up step change the attributes directly. We then try to delete the record.
I tested this by grabbing the source of aws_resource_route53.go from Terraform v0.6.9 and running the included test, which fails. The test will pass with #4892 , because we no longer reconstruct what the record should be based on the state (instead finding via the API and elimination/matching)
This resource is the first which makes use of the new Riviera library
(at https://github.com/jen20/riviera), so there is some additional set
up work to add the provider to the client which gets passed among
resources.
This commit adds the ability to associate a Floating IP to a specific
network. Previously, there only existed a top-level floating IP
attribute which was automatically associated with either the first
defined network or the default network (when no network block was
used).
Now floating IPs can be associated with networks beyond the first
defined network as well as each network being able to have their own
floating IP.
Specifying the floating IP by using the top-level floating_ip
attribute and the per-network floating IP attribute is not possible.
Additionally, an `access_network` attribute has been added in order
to easily specify which network should be used for provisioning.
See the updated docs for more details and examples, but in short this
enables the `attributes` param from the Chef provisioner to accept a
raw JSON string.
Fixes#3074Fixes#3572
Using EnvDefaultFunc with a default of empty string causes the
validation which would ordinarily be performed by `Required: true` in
the schema to not have any effect. Instead validate the configuration
used to produce the ARM client before attempting to use it during
provider configuration.
throw an error:
* aws_sns_topic_subscription.checker: NotFound: Subscription does not
* exist
status code: 404, request id: b8ca0c27-1a62-57b3-8b96-43038a0ead86
Terraform wasn't refreshing the state when the topic gave a 404
James Nugent