Also don't specify the default and rely on github.com/lib/pq (which uses "required"
and is different than what libpq(3) uses, which is "preferred" and unsupported by
github.com/lib/pq).
* Allow import of aws_security_groups with more than one source_security_group_id rule
* Add acceptable test for security group with multiple source rules.
When importing an `aws_vpc_peering_connection`, the code assumes that
the account under Terraform control is the initiator (requester) of the
VPC peering request. This holds true when the peering connection is
between two VPCs in the same account, or when the peering connection has
been initiated from the controlled account to another.
However, when the peering connection has been initiated from a foreign
account towards the account under management, importing the peering
connection into the statefile results in values of `peer_vpc_id` and
`vpc_id` being the opposite way round to what they should be, and in the
`peer_owner_id` being set to the managed account's ID rather than the
foreign account's ID.
This patch checks the Accepter and Requester Owner IDs against the AWS
connection's reported owner ID, and reverses the mapping if it is
determined that the VPC peering connection is owned by the foreign
account.
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_plan -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_plan
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachine_plan (798.75s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 798.835s
This adds the new resource aws_snapshot_create_volume_permission which
manages the createVolumePermission attribute of snapshots. This allows
granting an AWS account permissions to create a volume from a particular
snapshot. This is often required to allow another account to copy a
private AMI.
The value is only multiplied by the API for topics in non-premium namespaces
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioning -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioningStandard
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioningStandard (378.80s)
=== RUN TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioningPremium
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMServiceBusTopic_enablePartitioningPremium (655.00s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm 1033.874s
AWS allows only the case-sensitive strings `Allow` and `Deny` to appear
in the `Effect` fields of IAM policy documents. Catch deviations from
this, including mis-casing, before hitting the API and generating an
error (the error is a generic 400 and doesn't indicate what part of the
policy doc is invalid).
* provider/datadog 9869: Validate credentials when initialising client.
* provider/datadog Pull in new version of go-datadog-api.
* provider/datadog Update testAccCheckDatadogMonitorConfigNoThresholds test config.
Fixes#8455, #5390
This add a new `no_device` attribute to `ephemeral_block_device` block,
which allows users omit ephemeral devices from AMI's predefined block
device mappings, which is useful for EBS-only instance types.
* provider/datadog #9375: Refactor tags to a list instead of a map.
Tags are allowed to be but not restricted to, key value pairs (ie: foo:bar)
but are esssentially strings. This changes allows using, and mixing of tags with
form "foo" and "foo:bar". It also allows using duplicate keys like "foo:bar" and "foo:baz".
* provider/datadog update import test.
This commit extracts the GPG code used for aws_iam_user_login_profile
into a library that can be reused for other resources, and updates the
call sites appropriately.
* provider/azurerm: Bump sdk version to 7.0.1
* Fixing the build (#10489)
* Fixing the broken tests (#10499)
* Updating the method signatures to match (#10533)
Fixes#10463
I'm really surprised this flew under the radar for years...
By having unique PRNGs, the SSH communicator could and would
generate identical ScriptPaths and two provisioners running in parallel
could overwrite each other and execute the same script. This would
happen because they're both seeded by the current time which could
potentially be identical if done in parallel...
Instead, we share the rand now so that the sequence is guaranteed
unique. As an extra measure of robustness, we also multiple by the PID
so that we're also protected against two processes at the same time.
Sean Chittenden