Both resource blocks and module blocks contain references to providers
that are expressed as short-form provider addresses ("aws.foo" rather than
"provider.aws.foo").
These rules call for those to be unwrapped as naked identifiers during
upgrade, rather than appearing as quoted strings. This also introduces
some further rules for other simpler meta-arguments that are required
for the test fixtures for this feature.
Some further rules are required here to deal with the meta-arguments we
accept inside these blocks, but this is good enough to pass through most
module blocks using the standard attribute-expression-based mapping.
Previously we were handling this one as a special case, effectively
duplicating most of the logic from upgradeBlockBody.
By doing some prior analysis of the block we can produce a "rules" that
just passes through all of the attributes as-is, allowing us to reuse
upgradeBlockBody. This is a little weird for the locals block since
everything in it is user-selected names, but this facility will also be
useful in a future commit for dealing with module blocks, which contain
a mixture of user-chosen and reserved argument names.
Prior to v0.12 Terraform was liberal about these and allowed them to
mismatch, but now it's important to get this right so that resources
and resource instances can be used directly as object values, and so
we'll fix up any sloppy existing references so things keep working as
expected.
This is particularly important for the pattern of using count to create
conditional resources, since previously the "true" case would create one
instance and Terraform would accept an unindexed reference to that.
Previously we were erroneously moving these out of their original block
into the surrounding body. Now we'll make sure to collect up any remaining
ad-hoc comments inside a nested block body before closing it.
Users discovered that they could exploit some missing validation in
Terraform v0.11 and prior to treat block types as if they were attributes
and assign dynamic expressions to them, with some significant caveats and
gotchas resulting from the fact that this was never intended to work.
However, since such patterns are in use in the wild we'll convert them
to a dynamic block during upgrade. With only static analysis we must
unfortunately generate a very conservative, ugly dynamic block with
every possible argument set. Users ought to then clean up the generated
configuration after confirming which arguments are actually required.
Previously we were using the line count difference between the start of
one item and the next to decide whether to insert a blank line between
two items, but that is incorrect for multi-line items.
Instead, we'll now count the difference from the final line of the
previous item to the first line of the next, as best we can with the
limited position info recorded by the HCL1 parser.
The main area of interest in upgrading is dealing with special cases for
individual block items, so this generalization allows us to use the same
overall body-processing logic for everything but to specialize just how
individual items are dealt with, which we match by their names as given
in the original input source code.
This involved some refactoring of how block bodies are migrated, which
still needs some additional work to deal with meta-arguments but is now
at least partially generalized to support both resource and provider
blocks.
In order to properly migrate the contents of resource, data, provider and
provisioner blocks we will need the provider's schema in order to
understand what is expected, so we can resolve some ambiguities inherent
in the legacy HCL AST.
This includes an initial prototype of migrating the content of resource
blocks just to verify that the information is being gathered correctly.
As with the rest of the upgrade_native.go file, this will be reorganized
significantly once the basic end-to-end flow is established and we can
see how to organize this code better.
This covers all of the expression node types in HIL's AST, and also
includes initial support for some of our top-level blocks so that we can
easily test that.
The initial implementations of the "variable" and "output" blocks are
pretty redundant and messy, so we can hopefully improve on these in a
later pass.
Martin Atkins