It turns out that `d.GetOk` also returns `false` when the user _did_ actually supply a value for it in the config, but the value itself needs to be evaluated before it can be used.
So instead of passing a `ResourceData` we now pass a `ResourceConfig`
which makes much more sense for doing the validation anyway.
The tests did pass, but that was because they only tested part of the changes. By using the `schema.TestResourceDataRaw` function the schema and config are better tested and so they pointed out a problem with the schema of the Chef provisioner.
The `Elem` fields did not have a `*schema.Schema` but a `schema.Schema` and in an `Elem` schema only the `Type` field may (and must) be set. Any other fields like `Optional` are not allowed here.
Next to fixing that problem I also did a little refactoring and cleaning up. Mainly making the `ProvisionerS` private (`provisioner`) and removing the deprecated fields.
1. Migrate `chef` provisioner to `schema.Provisioner`:
* `chef.Provisioner` structure was renamed to `ProvisionerS`and now it's decoded from `schema.ResourceData` instead of `terraform.ResourceConfig` using simple copy-paste-based solution;
* Added simple schema without any validation yet.
2. Support `ValidateFunc` validate function : implemented in `file` and `chef` provisioners.
Fixes#10788
This checks `IsComputed` prior to attempting to use the JSON
configurations. Due to a change in 0.8, the prior check for simply map
existence would always succeed even with a computed value (as designed),
but we forgot to update provisioners to not do that.
There are other provisioners that also do this but to no ill effect
currently. I've only changed Chef since we know that is an issue.
This issue doesn't affect 0.9 due to helper/schema doing this
automatically for provisioners.
* provisioner/chef: Support named run-lists for Policyfiles
Add an optional argument for overriding the Chef Client's initial
run with a named run-list specified by the Policyfile. This is useful
for bootstrapping a node with a one-time setup recipe that deviates
from a policy's normal run-list.
* Update chef client cmd building per review feedback.
Fixes#3605 and adds the functionality suggested in PR #7440.
This PR is using a different appraoch that (IMHO) feels cleaner and (even more important) adds support for Windows at the same time.
See the updated docs for more details and examples, but in short this
enables the `attributes` param from the Chef provisioner to accept a
raw JSON string.
Fixes#3074Fixes#3572
PR #3896 added support for passing keys by content, but in this same PR
all references to `path.Join()` where changed to `filepath.join()`.
There is however a significant difference between these two calls and
using the latter one now causes issues when running the Chef
provisioner on Windows (see issue #4039).
Builds on the work of #3846, shifting the Chef provisioner's
configuration options from `secret_key_path` and `validation_key_path`
over to `secret_key` and `validation_key`.
This Adds three new arguments `use_policyfile`, `policy_group` and `policy_name` to the Chef
provisioner. If `use_policyfile` == true, then the other arguments are required.
Still not a 100% fix, but that would require some more hacking in core
TF. If time permits I’ll have a look at that later on… But for now this
is a good fix to be able to close#2872
By prefixing them with `cmd /c` it will work with both `winner` and
`ssh` connection types.
This PR also reverts some bad stringer changes made in PR #2673
When surrounding the version with quotes, even no version (an empty
string) will be accepted as parameter. The install.sh script treats an
empty version string the same as no when version is set. So it will
then just use the latest available version.
Before this option (`os_type`) the provisioner would use the connection
type to determine the targeted OS. When not supplying a value for
`os_type`, it will fall back to the old behaviour, so this is full BC.
We need to decode both the Raw config and the parsed Config to make
sure all set keys are visible. Otherwise keys that will need to be
interpolated later, will be missing causing the validation to fail.
Sander van Harmelen