Commit Graph

396 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alisdair McDiarmid 7f3a29b46e
Merge pull request #29523 from hashicorp/alisdair/moved-ui
command: Render "moved" annotations in plan UI
2021-09-07 14:28:11 -04:00
James Bardin 1ad0421e15
Merge pull request #29522 from hashicorp/jbardin/json-blocktoattr
allow json output to marshal ConfigModeAttr blocks
2021-09-07 11:32:21 -04:00
Alisdair McDiarmid 29999c1d6f command: Render "moved" annotations in plan UI
For resources which are planned to move, render the previous run address
as additional information in the plan UI. For the case of a move-only
resource (which otherwise is unchanged), we also render that as a
planned change, but without any corresponding action symbol.

If all changes in the plan are moves without changes, the plan is no
longer considered "empty". In this case, we skip rendering the action
symbols in the UI.
2021-09-03 17:44:07 -04:00
James Bardin ac2a870ea0 allow json output to marshal ConfigModeAttr blocks
In order to marshal config blocks using ConfigModeAttr, we need to
insert the fixup body to map hcl blocks to the attribute in the schema.
2021-09-03 13:53:52 -04:00
Alisdair McDiarmid 06956773dc configs: Disable experiment warnings at link time
This package level variable can be overridden at link time to allow
temporarily disabling the UI warning when experimental features are
enabled. This makes it easier to understand how UI will render when the
feature is no longer experimental.

This change is only for those developing Terraform.
2021-09-03 12:11:06 -04:00
James Bardin 863963e7a6 de-linting 2021-09-01 11:36:21 -04:00
James Bardin 7c02ef6220
Merge pull request #29482 from hashicorp/jbardin/computed-obj-attrs
Computed values within nested object types in `AssertPlanValid`
2021-08-31 11:26:52 -04:00
James Bardin f195ce7fd4 remove temp test 2021-08-31 11:17:32 -04:00
Martin Atkins 7803f69d42 core: Enable TestContext2Plan_movedResourceBasic
This is the first test exercising the basic functionality of config-driven
move. We previously had it skipped because Terraform's previous design
of treating all three of the state artifacts as mutable attributes of
terraform.Context meant that it was too late during planning to deal with
the move operations, and thus this test was failing.

Thanks to the previous commit, which changes the terraform.Context API
such that we can defer creating the three state artifacts until we're
already doing planning, this test now works and shows Terraform correctly
handling a resource that was formerly called "a" and is now called "b",
with a "moved" block recording that renaming.
2021-08-30 13:59:14 -07:00
Martin Atkins 89b05050ec core: Functional-style API for terraform.Context
Previously terraform.Context was built in an unfortunate way where all of
the data was provided up front in terraform.NewContext and then mutated
directly by subsequent operations. That made the data flow hard to follow,
commonly leading to bugs, and also meant that we were forced to take
various actions too early in terraform.NewContext, rather than waiting
until a more appropriate time during an operation.

This (enormous) commit changes terraform.Context so that its fields are
broadly just unchanging data about the execution context (current
workspace name, available plugins, etc) whereas the main data Terraform
works with arrives via individual method arguments and is returned in
return values.

Specifically, this means that terraform.Context no longer "has-a" config,
state, and "planned changes", instead holding on to those only temporarily
during an operation. The caller is responsible for propagating the outcome
of one step into the next step so that the data flow between operations is
actually visible.

However, since that's a change to the main entry points in the "terraform"
package, this commit also touches every file in the codebase which
interacted with those APIs. Most of the noise here is in updating tests
to take the same actions using the new API style, but this also affects
the main-code callers in the backends and in the command package.

My goal here was to refactor without changing observable behavior, but in
practice there are a couple externally-visible behavior variations here
that seemed okay in service of the broader goal:
 - The "terraform graph" command is no longer hooked directly into the
   core graph builders, because that's no longer part of the public API.
   However, I did include a couple new Context functions whose contract
   is to produce a UI-oriented graph, and _for now_ those continue to
   return the physical graph we use for those operations. There's no
   exported API for generating the "validate" and "eval" graphs, because
   neither is particularly interesting in its own right, and so
   "terraform graph" no longer supports those graph types.
 - terraform.NewContext no longer has the responsibility for collecting
   all of the provider schemas up front. Instead, we wait until we need
   them. However, that means that some of our error messages now have a
   slightly different shape due to unwinding through a differently-shaped
   call stack. As of this commit we also end up reloading the schemas
   multiple times in some cases, which is functionally acceptable but
   likely represents a performance regression. I intend to rework this to
   use caching, but I'm saving that for a later commit because this one is
   big enough already.

The proximal reason for this change is to resolve the chicken/egg problem
whereby there was previously no single point where we could apply "moved"
statements to the previous run state before creating a plan. With this
change in place, we can now do that as part of Context.Plan, prior to
forking the input state into the three separate state artifacts we use
during planning.

However, this is at least the third project in a row where the previous
API design led to piling more functionality into terraform.NewContext and
then working around the incorrect order of operations that produces, so
I intend that by paying the cost/risk of this large diff now we can in
turn reduce the cost/risk of future projects that relate to our main
workflow actions.
2021-08-30 13:59:14 -07:00
Martin Atkins 4faac6ee43 core: Record move result information in the plan
Here we wire through the "move results" into the graph walk data
structures so that all of the the nodes which produce
plans.ResourceInstanceChange values can capture the "PrevRunAddr" for
each resource instance.

This doesn't actually quite work yet, because the logic in Context.Plan
isn't actually correct and so the updated state from
refactoring.ApplyMoves isn't actually visible as the "previous run state".
For that reason, the context test in this commit is currently skipped,
with the intent of re-enabling it once the updated state is properly
propagating into the plan graph walk and thus we can actually react to
the result of the move while choosing actions for those addresses.
2021-08-30 13:59:14 -07:00
Martin Atkins 22b36d1f4c Field for the previous address of each resource instance in the plan
In order to expose the effect of any relevant "moved" statements we dealt
with prior to creating the plan, we'll record with each
ResourceInstanceChange both is current address and the address it was
tracked at for the previous run.

To save consumers of these objects from having to special-case the
situation where there _was_ no previous run (e.g. because this is a Create
change), we'll just pretend the previous run address was the same as the
current address in that case, the same as for an update without any
renaming in effect.

This includes a breaking change to the plan file format, but one that
doesn't require a version number increment because there is no ambiguity
between the two formats and so mismatched parsers will already fail with
an error message.

As of this commit we've just added the new field but not yet populated it
with any useful information: it always just matches Addr. A future commit
will wire this up to the result of applying the moves so that we can
populate it correctly. We also don't yet expose this new information
anywhere in the UI layer.
2021-08-30 13:59:14 -07:00
James Bardin ea68d79ea2 nested object values can be computed
While blocks were not allowed to be computed by the provider, nested
objects can be. Remove the errors regarding blocks and verify unknown
values are valid.
2021-08-30 14:30:07 -04:00
James Bardin 903797084a objects vs maps in nested object types
When using NestedMap objects, unify the codepath for both maps and
objects as they may be interchangeable.
2021-08-30 14:30:02 -04:00
James Bardin 7ca6be8285 correctly verify planned nested object values
The validation for nested object types with computed attributes was
using the incorrect function call.
2021-08-30 14:29:15 -04:00
Martin Atkins ce96d82de0 build: Centralize our protobuf compilation steps
We have a few different .proto files in this repository that all need to
get recompiled into .pb.go files each time we change them, but we were
previously handling that with some scripts that just assumed that protoc
and the relevant plugins were already installed on the system somewhere,
at the right versions.

In practice we've been constantly flopping between different versions of
these tools due to folks having different versions installed in their
development environments. In particular, the state of the .pb.go files
in the prior commit wasn't reproducible by any single version of the tools
because they've all slightly diverged from one another.

In the interests of being more consistent here and avoiding accidental
inconsistencies, we'll now centralize the protocol buffer compile steps
all into a single tool that knows how to fetch and install the expected
versions of the various tools we need and then run those tools with the
right options to get a stable result.

If we want to upgrade to either a newer protoc or a newer protoc-gen-go
in future then we'll do that in a central location and update all of the
.pb.go files at the same time, so that we're always consistently tracking
the same version of protocol buffers everywhere.

While doing this I attempted to keep as close as possible to the toolchain
we'd most recently used, but since they were not consistent with each
other they've now all changed which version numbers they record at minimum,
and the planproto stub in particular now also has a slightly different
descriptor serialization but is otherwise offering the same API.
2021-08-20 16:18:48 -07:00
James Bardin 249e05f827
Merge pull request #29437 from hashicorp/jbardin/move
refactoring: complete CanChainFrom and NestedWithin
2021-08-20 17:54:27 -04:00
Alisdair McDiarmid 40dd4292b8
Merge pull request #29438 from hashicorp/alisdair/init-force-copy-multiple-workspaces
command: Suppress prompt for init -force-copy
2021-08-20 15:21:43 -04:00
James Bardin 30afb492ab fix ApplyMove test with nested modules working
The addrs package can now correctly handle the combinations of nested
module endpoints, which fixes these 2 tests.
2021-08-20 15:17:06 -04:00
James Bardin bc60f7aae4 Extend CanChainFrom to handle relative modules
CanChainFrom needs to be able to handle move statements from different
relative modules, re-implementing with addrs.anyKey

Add the anyKey InstanceKey value to the addrs package to simplify module
path comparison. This allows all combinations of module path
representation to be normalized into a ModuleInstance which can be
compared directly, rather than dealing with multiple levels of different
prefix types.
2021-08-20 15:17:06 -04:00
Alisdair McDiarmid 2762a940c0 command: Suppress prompt for init -force-copy
The -force-copy flag to init should automatically migrate state.
Previously this was not applied to one case: when migrating from
a backend with multiple workspaces to another backend supporting
multiple workspaces. I believe this was an oversight so this commit
fixes that.
2021-08-20 14:46:09 -04:00
Alisdair McDiarmid 70a4f7a6b6 command: Fix stale lock after running add 2021-08-20 13:22:11 -04:00
James Bardin 11561b22cd
Merge pull request #29330 from hashicorp/jbardin/move
refactoring: CanChainFrom and NestedWithin
2021-08-19 12:34:38 -04:00
Martin Atkins 43d753e727 command: "terraform add" is experimental
We're aware of several quirks of this command's current design, which
result from some existing architectural limitations that we can't address
immediately.

However, we do still want to make this command available in its current
capacity as an incremental improvement, so as a compromise we'll document
it as experimental. Our intent here is to exclude it from the
Terraform 1.0 Compatibility Promises so that we can have the space to
continue to improve the design as other parts of the overall Terraform
system gain new capabilities.

We don't currently have any concrete plan for this command to be
stabilized and subject to compatibility promises. That decision will
follow from ongoing discussions with other teams whose systems may need to
change in order to support the final design of "terraform add".
2021-08-19 09:27:30 -07:00
James Bardin 553d6525d2 more move tests 2021-08-19 12:05:53 -04:00
James Bardin 2dff0481c8 missed relMatch for AbsModuleCall in SelectsModule 2021-08-19 12:05:53 -04:00
James Bardin 58aabb54ca
Merge pull request #29410 from hashicorp/jbardin/format-empty-nested-attrs
handle null and unknown values in attr diffs
2021-08-18 14:54:27 -04:00
James Bardin 68ed50616e handle null and unknown values in attr diffs
The code adopted from block diffs was not set to handle null and unknown
values, as those are not allowed for blocks.

We also revert the change to formatting nested object types as single
attributes, because the attribute formatter cannot handle sensitive
values from the schema. This presents some awkward syntax for diffs for
now, but should suffice until the entire formatter can be refactored to
better handle these new nested types.
2021-08-18 14:12:01 -04:00
James Bardin da007517b0 handle null NestingSingle values
Null NestingSingle attributes were not being handled in ProposedNew
2021-08-18 13:52:18 -04:00
Martin Atkins c23a7fce4e lang/funcs: Preserve IP address leading zero behavior from Go 1.16
Go 1.17 includes a breaking change to both net.ParseIP and net.ParseCIDR
functions to reject IPv4 address octets written with leading zeros.

Our use of these functions as part of the various CIDR functions in the
Terraform language doesn't have the same security concerns that the Go
team had in evaluating this change to the standard library, and so we
can't justify an exception to our v1.0 compatibility promises on the same
sort of security grounds that the Go team used to justify their
compatibility exception.

For that reason, we'll now use our own fork of the Go library functions
which has the new check disabled in order to preserve the prior behavior.
We're taking this path, rather than pre-normalizing the IP address before
calling into the standard library, because an additional normalization
layer would be entirely new code and additional complexity, whereas this
fork is relatively minor in terms of code size and avoids any significant
changes to our own calls to these functions.

Thanks to the Kubernetes team for their prior work on carving out a subset
of the "net" package for their similar backward-compatibility concern.
Our "ipaddr" package here is a lightly-modified fork of their fork, with
only the comments changed to talk about Terraform instead of Kubernetes.

This fork is not intended for use in any other future feature
implementations, because they wouldn't be subject to the same
compatibility constraints as our existing functions. We will use these
forked implementations for new callers only if consistency with the
behavior of the existing functions is a key requirement.
2021-08-17 15:20:05 -07:00
Martin Atkins 383bbdeebc Upgrade to Go 1.17
This includes the addition of the new "//go:build" comment form in addition
to the legacy "// +build" notation, as produced by gofmt to ensure
consistent behavior between Go versions. The new directives are all
equivalent to what was present before, so there's no change in behavior.

Go 1.17 continues to use the Unicode 13 tables as in Go 1.16, so this
upgrade does not require also upgrading our Unicode-related dependencies.

This upgrade includes the following breaking changes which will also
appear as breaking changes for Terraform users, but that are consistent
with the Terraform v1.0 compatibility promises.

- On MacOS, Terraform now requires macOS 10.13 High Sierra or later.

This upgrade also includes the following breaking changes which will
appear as breaking changes for Terraform users that are inconsistent with
our compatibility promises, but have justified exceptions as follows:

- cidrsubnet, cidrhost, and cidrnetmask will now reject IPv4 CIDR
  addresses whose decimal components have leading zeros, where previously
  they would just silently ignore those leading zeros.

  This is a security-motivated exception to our compatibility promises,
  because some external systems interpret zero-prefixed octets as octal
  numbers rather than decimal, and thus the previous lenient parsing could
  lead to a different interpretation of the address between systems, and
  thus potentially allow bypassing policy when configuring firewall rules
  etc.

This upgrade also includes the following breaking changes which could
_potentially_ appear as breaking changes for Terraform users, but that do
not in practice for the reasons given:

- The Go net/url package no longer allows query strings with pairs
  separated by semicolons instead of ampersands. This primarily affects
  HTTP servers written in Go, and Terraform includes a special temporary
  HTTP server as part of its implementation of OAuth for "terraform login",
  but that server only needs to accept URLs created by Terraform itself
  and Terraform does not generate any URLs that would be rejected.
2021-08-17 15:20:05 -07:00
James Bardin a94155d0ca
Merge pull request #29397 from hashicorp/jbardin/format-id-name-marks
unmark object ID or Name for formatting
2021-08-17 14:58:56 -04:00
James Bardin a48b024c0a unmark object ID or Name for formatting 2021-08-17 12:24:43 -04:00
James Bardin 296a757ab4 check for null sets in diff rendering 2021-08-16 18:25:16 -04:00
James Bardin fbfb14142e render empty nested containers as attributes
Don't try to break down containers that are empty to render the diff, so
we can avoid having to check for empty vs null in all cases.
2021-08-16 18:13:55 -04:00
Radek Simko 2496bc2b1e
internal/registry: Add URL to error message for clarity (#29298) 2021-08-10 15:20:40 +01:00
James Bardin 6087b1bdb9 CanChainFrom and NestedWithin
Add implementations of CanChainFrom and NestedWithin for
MoveEndpointInModule.

CanChainFrom allows the linking of move statements of the same address,
which means the prior destination address must equal the following
source address. If the destination and source addresses are of different
types, they must be covered by NestedWithin rather than CanChainFrom.

NestedWithin checks if the destination contains the source address. Any
matching types would be covered by CanChainFrom.
2021-08-10 10:13:21 -04:00
James Bardin 493ec4e6c5 correct the direction and walk order of the graph 2021-08-10 10:12:39 -04:00
James Bardin 88ad938cc6 Equal methods for move AbsMoveable
Make sure all the types are comparable
2021-08-10 10:12:17 -04:00
James Bardin 08edb02270 MoveStatement.Name()
makes the graph printable for debugging
2021-08-10 10:11:57 -04:00
James Bardin 789317dc05 additional test 2021-08-10 10:11:57 -04:00
James Bardin 6401022bc8 don't take the address of a range variable 2021-08-10 10:11:57 -04:00
Alisdair McDiarmid 3b33dc1105 json-output: Add output changes to plan logs
Extend the outputs JSON log message to support an `action` field (and
make the `type` and `value` fields optional). This allows us to emit a
useful output change summary as part of the plan, bringing the JSON log
output into parity with the text output.

While we do have access to the before/after values in the output
changes, attempting to wedge those into a structured log message is not
appropriate. That level of detail can be extracted from the JSON plan
output from `terraform show -json`.
2021-08-05 15:32:26 -04:00
James Bardin 09ab952683 fix ApplyMoves tests
Add empty result value, since ApplyMoves does not return nil.
Fix the desired addresses for moves.
2021-08-02 17:23:35 -04:00
James Bardin 97a2694528
Merge pull request #28838 from remilapeyre/consul-size-limit
Fix handling large states in the Consul backend
2021-07-30 14:18:34 -04:00
Martin Atkins aa414f3ab3 refactoring: First round of ValidateMoves rules
This is a first pass at implementing refactoring.ValidateMoves, covering
the main validation rules.

This is not yet complete. A couple situations not yet covered are
represented by commented test cases in TestValidateMoves, although that
isn't necessarily comprehensive. We'll do a further pass of filling this
out with any other subtleties before we ship this feature.
2021-07-29 12:29:36 -07:00
Martin Atkins ae2c93f255 addrs: All AbsMovable implementations implement UniqueKeyer 2021-07-29 12:29:36 -07:00
Martin Atkins f76a3467dc core: Call into refactoring.ValidateMoves after creating a plan
As of this commit, refactoring.ValidateMoves doesn't actually do anything
yet (always returns nil) but the goal here is to wire in the set of all
declared instances so that refactoring.ValidateMoves will then have all
of the information it needs to encapsulate our validation rules.

The actual implementation of refactoring.ValidateMoves will follow in
subsequent commits.
2021-07-28 13:54:10 -07:00
Martin Atkins 51346f0d87 instances: Expander.AllInstances
In order to precisely implement the validation rules for "moved"
statements we need to be able to test whether particular instances were
declared in the configuration.

The instance expander is the source of record for which instances we
decided while creating a plan, but it's API is far more involved than what
our validation rules need, so this new AllInstances method returns a
wrapper object with a more straightforward API that provides read-only
access to just the question of whether particular instances got registered
in the expander already.

This API covers all three of the kinds of objects that move statements can
refer to. It includes module calls and resources, even though they aren't
_themselves_ "instances" in the sense we usually mean, because the module
instance addresses they are contained within _are_ instances and so we
need to take their dynamic instance keys into account when answering these
queries.
2021-07-28 13:54:10 -07:00
Martin Atkins 57d36c1d9d addrs: ModuleInstance.ChildCall method
This allows us to concisely construct AbsModuleCall address values by
method chaining from module instance addresses.
2021-07-28 13:54:10 -07:00